BOS

2025-26 Season

JORDAN WALSH

Boston Celtics | Guard | 6-6
Jordan Walsh
5.0PPG
3.9RPG
0.8APG
17.3MPG
-3.0 Impact

Walsh produces at an below average rate for a 17-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-3.0
Scoring +4.5
Points Scored 5.0 PPG = +5.0
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -1.5
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.0
Creation +0.4
Assists & Self-Creation 0.8 AST/g + self-creation = +0.4
Turnovers -1.1
Turnovers 0.5/g (live + dead blend) = -1.1
Defense +0.2
Steals 0.7/g = +1.6
Blocks 0.4/g = +0.4
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.8
Hustle & Effort +3.6
Rebounds 3.9 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +2.0
Contested Shots 2.4/g = +0.5
Deflections 1.4/g = +0.9
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.2/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.4/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +7.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.6
Net Impact
-3.0
40th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 14th
5.4 PPG
Efficiency 55th
55.2% TS
Playmaking 7th
0.9 APG
Rebounding 81th
4.2 RPG
Defense 30th
+5.5/g
Hustle 90th
+14.6/g
Creation 56th
+3.02/g
Shot Making 31th
+5.20/g
TO Discipline 93th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jordan Walsh’s first 23 games were defined by a dramatic mid-November promotion that transformed him from an afterthought into an essential, highly efficient starter. Before finding his offensive rhythm, he relied entirely on raw energy to stay on the floor. He ground out a +7.6 Impact score on 11/12 vs PHI despite scoring just eight points because of his relentless rebounding and defensive effort. The transition to the starting unit wasn't completely seamless, however. During a brutal outing on 11/23 vs ORL, he managed just five points and posted a dismal -15.2 Impact, dragged down by passive shot selection and an inability to generate meaningful defensive stops. But once the game slowed down for him in December, Walsh became a lethal opportunistic scorer. He erupted on 12/05 vs WAS, pouring in 22 points and logging a massive +26.1 Impact by pairing a flawless 8-for-8 shooting night with seven rebounds and relentless hustle. This stretch revealed a player who no longer merely survives on an NBA court, but actively bends games to his will.

Jordan Walsh's midseason stretch was defined by a jarring demotion to the bench and a maddening inconsistency that made him a liability on most nights. He teased his absolute ceiling on 01/04 vs LAC, exploding for 13 points and 13 rebounds on highly efficient 5-for-7 shooting to generate a massive +16.5 impact score. That rare brilliance quickly evaporated. His trigger-happy shot selection heavily penalized him on 01/30 vs SAC, where a brutal 1-for-7 shooting night dragged him to a -5.0 impact score. When Walsh forces bad perimeter looks instead of doing the dirty work, his overall value plummets. However, he did manage to claw back some utility on 01/13 vs IND, scraping together a +1.5 impact score despite scoring a meager six points. That modest positive rating stemmed entirely from his relentless hustle on the boards, grabbing nine rebounds to salvage possessions when his jumper wasn't falling. Ultimately, this erratic run exposes a fringe rotation player who must crash the glass with pure ferocity just to survive.

Jordan Walsh’s late-season stretch was a frustrating exercise in offensive futility that occasionally gave way to gritty, blue-collar utility. He actually looked like a genuine two-way weapon on 02/11 vs CHI, pouring in 16 points and 6 rebounds on 7-of-12 shooting to generate a massive +14.9 Impact score. That brilliant performance was entirely driven by confident shot selection and relentless energy, but it quickly faded into a string of invisible bench shifts. When he was finally thrust into the starting lineup on 03/29 vs CHA, his jumper completely abandoned him. Despite scoring just 3 points on a brutal 1-for-7 from the floor, he somehow scraped together a +0.1 Impact score by grabbing 7 rebounds and grinding out stops over 34 exhausting minutes. By his 04/12 vs ORL start, however, the offensive limitations became too glaring to ignore. Even though he tied his second-highest scoring mark of the stretch with 9 points, he posted a dismal -4.0 Impact score because he needed nine field goal attempts to get there, clanking five threes and strangling the team's half-court spacing.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Inconsistent. Walsh has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~5 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 50% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Walsh consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: -1.5, second-half: -4.4. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 6 games. Longest cold streak: 9 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 72 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Johnson 44.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
M. Porter Jr. 42.5 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 6
C. McCollum 40.5 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.2
PTS 8
J. Collins 33.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Mitchell 31.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Walker 30.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
C. Cunningham 30.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3
D. Robinson 30.3 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 8
B. Portis 28.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4
P. Nance 24.8 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 6

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

C. McCollum 77.2 poss
FG% 26.1%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 18
J. Harden 58.7 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.32
PTS 19
C. Cunningham 52.7 poss
FG% 30.8%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.32
PTS 17
D. Mitchell 43.0 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
M. Porter Jr. 32.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
T. Maxey 32.6 poss
FG% 10.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
S. Barnes 31.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4
T. McConnell 30.4 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 5
P. Siakam 29.6 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 7
F. Wagner 24.5 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

75
Games
5.0
PPG
3.9
RPG
0.8
APG
0.7
SPG
0.4
BPG
49.0
FG%
36.5
3P%
73.0
FT%
17.3
MPG

GAME LOG

75 games played