GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Share Post

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

CLE Cleveland Cavaliers
S Evan Mobley 34.0m
23
pts
8
reb
6
ast
Impact
+18.7

Elite rim protection and switchability anchored a dominant defensive performance that completely erased the opponent's interior attack. Despite a clunky shooting night from the floor, his sheer volume of defensive contests altered the geometry of the court. His playmaking out of the short roll carved up trapping schemes.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 12/12 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.9%
USG% 26.3%
Net Rtg +27.0
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.0m
Scoring +17.4
Creation +3.4
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +5.3
Defense +3.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 52.4%
STL 3
BLK 2
TO 2
24
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+4.9

A brutal night from beyond the arc cratered his overall efficiency and stalled out crucial offensive sets. He repeatedly forced isolation looks against set defenses instead of moving the ball. While he generated some rim pressure, the wasted perimeter possessions were too costly.

Shooting
FG 9/20 (45.0%)
3PT 1/8 (12.5%)
FT 5/8 (62.5%)
Advanced
TS% 51.0%
USG% 31.0%
Net Rtg -1.8
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.4m
Scoring +14.1
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +4.9
Hustle +0.9
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -10.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 5
S Sam Merrill 30.4m
17
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+6.7

Lethal off-screen shooting stretched the defense to its breaking point. His quick trigger punished drop coverage, forcing bigs to step out and opening up the paint for slashers. Maintained active hands defensively to chip in on that end of the floor.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 4/9 (44.4%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.0%
USG% 16.2%
Net Rtg +29.2
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.4m
Scoring +12.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +3.8
Defense -3.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S De'Andre Hunter 26.7m
16
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+3.0

Defensive lapses against quicker wings negated a relatively steady offensive output. He frequently got caught ball-watching, surrendering back-door cuts that led to easy layups. The inability to stay in front of his man forced the defense into scramble mode.

Shooting
FG 6/13 (46.2%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.6%
USG% 25.4%
Net Rtg +9.2
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.7m
Scoring +9.3
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +5.1
Defense -2.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 61.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Jarrett Allen 26.2m
8
pts
11
reb
1
ast
Impact
+8.6

Controlled the paint with disciplined verticality and relentless work on the offensive glass. By sealing off driving lanes and securing extra possessions, he provided a massive stabilizing presence. His screen-setting freed up guards for clean downhill attacks.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.1%
USG% 12.1%
Net Rtg +17.4
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.2m
Scoring +5.7
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +13.0
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 64.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Lonzo Ball 23.1m
11
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
-0.5

Kept the ball popping in transition but struggled to generate consistent advantages in the half-court. His point-of-attack defense was solid, yet he lacked the burst to collapse the defense off the dribble. A relatively quiet shift that didn't move the needle in either direction.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 1/3 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 66.1%
USG% 17.5%
Net Rtg -15.4
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.1m
Scoring +7.4
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +4.7
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
Dean Wade 23.0m
4
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-11.9

Passing up open looks and bricking the ones he did take severely cramped the half-court spacing. Opponents completely ignored him on the perimeter, allowing them to pack the paint and stifle drives. Defensive hesitation further dragged down his overall impact.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 34.0%
USG% 10.2%
Net Rtg -7.7
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.0m
Scoring +1.1
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +0.3
Defense -3.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.9

Tenacious on-ball pressure and excellent gap discipline defined a highly impactful defensive stint. He blew up multiple dribble hand-offs, turning defensive stops into transition opportunities. Played within himself offensively, making the right reads without forcing the issue.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg +14.8
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.4m
Scoring +2.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +1.9
Defense +6.8
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 2
Jaylon Tyson 14.9m
5
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.9

Defensive inexperience was ruthlessly exploited by veteran guards who consistently put him in the torture chamber. He struggled to navigate screens, forcing teammates to over-help and concede open looks. The modest offensive contributions couldn't mask the bleeding on the other end.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg -42.2
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.9m
Scoring +3.3
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
5
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.1

Provided a steadying veteran presence with timely rotations and smart positional rebounding. His ability to hit the trail three forced opposing bigs to respect his range. Seamlessly connected the offense with quick-decision passing from the high post.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 13.8%
Net Rtg -3.7
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.0m
Scoring +4.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +6.3
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
MIL Milwaukee Bucks
S Ryan Rollins 33.9m
14
pts
4
reb
8
ast
Impact
+9.6

Playmaking and defensive disruption anchored a highly productive shift despite a shaky outside shot. He consistently broke down the primary point of attack, generating high-quality looks for others. His on-ball pressure disrupted opposing sets before they could materialize.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.8%
USG% 17.7%
Net Rtg +12.4
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.9m
Scoring +9.6
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +5.1
Defense +5.0
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 23.5%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 2
40
pts
14
reb
9
ast
Impact
+44.4

Absolute dominance at the rim fueled an astronomical box score impact. His sheer physical presence bent the defense on every possession, creating high-percentage looks while suffocating opponents on the other end. Dictated the terms of engagement from the opening tip.

Shooting
FG 14/20 (70.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 11/16 (68.8%)
Advanced
TS% 74.0%
USG% 37.0%
Net Rtg -10.1
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.3m
Scoring +32.8
Creation +5.0
Shot Making +5.1
Hustle +12.9
Defense +4.2
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 47.1%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 2
S Myles Turner 31.2m
13
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+0.6

Despite solid rim protection and active hustle metrics, inefficient perimeter shooting dragged his overall impact into the red. Settling for heavily contested deep balls bailed out the defense. His interior presence wasn't enough to offset the wasted offensive possessions.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.5%
USG% 21.3%
Net Rtg +1.5
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.2m
Scoring +7.1
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +7.6
Defense -0.4
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 3
S AJ Green 30.9m
20
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+3.5

High-level off-ball movement and elite floor spacing generated a massive boost to the offensive flow. His constant motion forced defensive rotations, opening up driving lanes for teammates while cashing in on catch-and-shoot opportunities. Active hustle plays kept possessions alive.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 89.3%
USG% 17.9%
Net Rtg +2.7
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.9m
Scoring +17.1
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +4.6
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.9
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 43.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Gary Trent Jr. 28.4m
6
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-13.2

Poor shot selection and a cold perimeter stroke completely tanked his overall value. Clanking away from deep neutralized his slight positive contributions on the defensive end. Opponents sagged off him, bogging down the half-court offense.

Shooting
FG 2/9 (22.2%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 30.4%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -44.1
+/- -23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.4m
Scoring +0.3
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.2
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
8
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+2.5

Solid defensive rotations and efficient spot-up shooting weren't enough to overcome quiet stretches where he floated out of the offensive scheme. A lack of overall volume limited his ability to leave a lasting imprint on the game. He struggled to assert himself against physical wing matchups.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 9.3%
Net Rtg +7.4
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.2m
Scoring +5.7
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +0.9
Defense +6.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 1
Bobby Portis 22.8m
10
pts
8
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.7

Forcing contested mid-range jumpers derailed his offensive rhythm and stalled out multiple possessions. While he battled on the glass to generate second-chance opportunities, the inefficient shot profile gave value right back to the opponent. Failed to exploit favorable mismatches in the post.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 26.9%
Net Rtg +2.1
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.8m
Scoring +5.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +6.3
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.6

Executed his role perfectly in a short burst by setting hard screens and rolling with intent. His vertical gravity drew weak-side help, subtly creating space for perimeter shooters. A neutral impact that stabilized the frontcourt rotation.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 6.7%
Net Rtg -23.5
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.9m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.0

Essentially operated as a cardio guy during his brief rotation minutes. While he didn't make glaring mistakes, his complete lack of offensive aggression allowed defenders to play five-on-four. Provided minimal resistance against dribble penetration.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -9.4
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.8m
Scoring +2.4
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +1.1
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -0.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Mark Sears 7.4m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-14.3

A brief, ineffective stint was marred by an inability to get involved in the offensive flow. He looked overwhelmed by the speed of the game, failing to generate any meaningful penetration. Defensive miscommunications further compounded a rough outing.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 11.8%
Net Rtg -40.8
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.4m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.6

Brought immediate defensive energy in a short stint, blowing up a key pick-and-roll action. His frantic activity level disrupted passing lanes even without registering counting stats. Stayed within himself offensively by deferring to primary creators.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +16.7
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.2m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0