BKN

2025-26 Season

DAY'RON SHARPE

Brooklyn Nets | Center | 6-10
Day'Ron Sharpe
8.7PPG
6.7RPG
2.3APG
18.7MPG
+1.6 Impact

Sharpe produces at an above average rate for a 19-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+1.6
Scoring +7.8
Points Scored 8.7 PPG = +8.7
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -2.2
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.3
Creation +0.9
Assists & Self-Creation 2.3 AST/g + self-creation = +0.9
Turnovers -4.1
Turnovers 1.7/g (live + dead blend) = -4.1
Defense +1.2
Steals 1.1/g = +2.5
Blocks 0.4/g = +0.4
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.7
Hustle & Effort +7.0
Rebounds 6.7 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +3.8
Contested Shots 4.0/g = +0.8
Deflections 2.4/g = +1.6
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.5/g = +0.3
Screen Assists 1.7/g = +0.5
Raw Impact +12.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.2
Net Impact
+1.6
51st pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 47th
8.7 PPG
Efficiency 67th
61.5% TS
Playmaking 77th
2.3 APG
Rebounding 54th
6.7 RPG
Defense 76th
+8.1/g
Hustle 54th
+17.8/g
Creation 60th
+2.55/g
Shot Making 37th
+3.56/g
TO Discipline 7th
0.09/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Day'Ron Sharpe's first 21 games of the 2025-26 campaign were defined by maddening inconsistency, alternating between sheer physical dominance and deeply detrimental backup stints. Look no further than the season opener on 10/22 vs CHA, where he poured in 14 points on near-perfect 6-for-7 shooting but still registered a -6.0 impact score because his efficient scoring was entirely negated by hidden costs like blown defensive assignments and giving up easy baskets. Just a few nights later, he flipped the script completely on 10/27 vs HOU, bullying his way to 17 points and 12 rebounds. That dominant double-double earned him a massive +15.9 impact score as he ruthlessly controlled the paint and generated crucial second-chance opportunities. He also found ways to contribute without a heavy offensive load, like his gritty performance on 12/04 vs CHI. Despite scoring a mere 5 points, he ripped down 7 rebounds in just 13 minutes, grinding out a +1.7 impact score through sheer hustle and physical interior defense. When he channels his aggression into rebounding, he is a terrifying matchup for opposing second units. However, until he cleans up the defensive lapses that drag down his overall metrics, his value will remain a volatile rollercoaster.

This midseason stretch was defined by Day'Ron Sharpe thriving as an ultra-efficient bench hub before a brief, bumpy promotion to the starting lineup disrupted his rhythm. Look at his dominant reserve shift on 12/14 vs MIL. He tallied 10 points, eight rebounds, and five assists in just 17 minutes, earning a massive +18.9 Impact score through flawless shot selection and punishing interior hustle rather than raw scoring volume. When thrust into the starting five shortly after, his offensive limitations became glaring. Despite logging 30 minutes on 01/08 vs ORL, Sharpe posted a -4.4 Impact score because his passive approach—attempting just four shots for five points—sapped the starting unit's momentum. Even back in a reserve role, wandering outside the paint carried heavy costs. He logged a dismal -7.9 Impact on 12/30 vs GSW, largely because ill-advised perimeter shooting and zero playmaking tanked his overall value. Sharpe is a wrecking ball when he sticks to the script, but asking him to stretch the floor yields rapidly diminishing returns.

This midseason stretch was defined by a chaotic pendulum swing between dominant interior bruising and puzzling disappearing acts. When fully engaged, Sharpe was an absolute terror around the basket. He bullied his way to 19 points, 14 rebounds, and five assists on 02/03 vs LAL, generating a massive +28.2 Impact by combining hyper-efficient finishing at the rim with brilliant passing out of the post. He didn't even need a heavy offensive workload to tilt the floor. On 01/28 vs PHX, Sharpe tallied just seven points but still posted a +10.6 Impact because his relentless rebounding and disruptive defensive rotations suffocated the opposition. Yet, that physical edge vanished just as quickly in certain matchups. Despite grabbing eight rebounds during a start on 03/01 vs CLE, he bled value with a disastrous -17.9 Impact, dragged down by sluggish defensive closeouts and empty offensive possessions. He remains a volatile weapon who dictates the game's physicality on his best nights and entirely loses the plot on his worst.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Sharpe's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~5 points per game.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 79% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Defensive difference-maker. Sharpe consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -0.6, second-half: +3.9. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 62 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

N. Vučević 76.9 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 10
J. Allen 71.5 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 4
L. Garza 46.1 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 11
I. Stewart 45.5 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
K. Ware 44.8 poss
FG% 87.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 14
M. Bagley III 44.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Powell 43.7 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 12
J. Huff 42.8 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 10
M. Diabaté 41.3 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.48
PTS 20
W. Carter Jr. 41.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

N. Vučević 57.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 15
J. Allen 57.3 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 12
I. Stewart 43.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
K. Ware 41.8 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
L. Garza 41.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 8
D. Powell 40.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
W. Carter Jr. 37.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 7
J. Sims 37.8 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
M. Bagley III 36.5 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 8
M. Diabaté 35.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

62
Games
8.7
PPG
6.7
RPG
2.3
APG
1.1
SPG
0.4
BPG
60.1
FG%
23.1
3P%
67.8
FT%
18.7
MPG

GAME LOG

62 games played