GAME ANALYSIS

GET THIS IN YOUR INBOX

Every breakdown for your team — free, the morning after the game.

Follow your team — free

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

PHI Philadelphia 76ers
S Tyrese Maxey 38.8m
28
pts
7
reb
9
ast
Impact
+14.7

Relentless two-way energy drove a superb +9.5 impact, highlighted by off-the-charts hustle metrics (+7.5) and disruptive perimeter defense (+8.3). His aggressive downhill attacks and timely outside shooting completely overwhelmed the opposing backcourt.

Shooting
FG 11/24 (45.8%)
3PT 5/8 (62.5%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.3%
USG% 27.9%
Net Rtg -9.8
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.8m
Scoring +17.9
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +7.5
Hustle +2.1
Defense +3.6
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 4
S VJ Edgecombe 37.8m
15
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+0.1

Defensive breakdowns (-1.4) and inefficient scoring attempts combined to produce a poor -7.5 net rating. Though he found his typical scoring volume, the defensive concessions and empty offensive trips outweighed his bucket-getting.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.4%
USG% 16.3%
Net Rtg +10.6
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.8m
Scoring +9.6
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +4.4
Defense -5.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Paul George 32.1m
12
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
-0.9

A sharp drop in offensive aggression resulted in a negative overall impact (-2.9), as he failed to generate his usual perimeter gravity. While his defensive positioning (+3.8) remained solid, the lack of scoring punch severely limited his overall effectiveness.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.8%
USG% 13.9%
Net Rtg -16.7
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.1m
Scoring +8.1
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +1.8
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Joel Embiid 30.3m
16
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+4.0

An absolutely catastrophic shooting night destroyed his offensive value and pushed his total impact into the red (-1.3). Elite rim protection (+5.9) prevented a total disaster, but forcing bad perimeter looks severely damaged the team's offensive flow.

Shooting
FG 4/21 (19.0%)
3PT 0/6 (0.0%)
FT 8/8 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 32.6%
USG% 33.8%
Net Rtg +21.9
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.3m
Scoring +4.1
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +6.0
Defense +1.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
S Dominick Barlow 23.9m
7
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.8

Snapping a streak of highly efficient performances, missed interior looks dragged his net score slightly into the negative (-0.9). He supplemented the poor shooting with active hustle (+3.1), but the wasted offensive possessions ultimately capped his value.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.4%
USG% 13.1%
Net Rtg -24.5
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.9m
Scoring +3.5
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +3.1
Defense +0.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 61.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
7
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
+3.2

Cold perimeter shooting threatened to sink his value, but excellent defensive execution (+4.0) kept his head above water (+0.8). He made up for the snapped efficiency streak by generating crucial hustle plays (+3.3) to maintain a positive floor presence.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.4%
USG% 10.1%
Net Rtg -0.1
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.2m
Scoring +3.1
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +9.2
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
11
pts
12
reb
0
ast
Impact
+10.4

Dominant work on the interior fueled a massive +11.7 impact, as he capitalized on extra touches to shatter his recent scoring averages. He anchored the paint with strong defensive positioning (+3.1) and created invaluable second-chance opportunities to swing the momentum.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 46.3%
USG% 24.0%
Net Rtg -45.2
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.7m
Scoring +5.9
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +15.2
Defense -1.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
4
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.9

Clunky offensive execution and a failure to stretch the floor resulted in a damaging -5.4 overall impact. Despite offering decent defensive resistance (+1.9), his inability to convert open looks bogged down the second-unit offense.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.0%
USG% 10.4%
Net Rtg +15.7
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.2m
Scoring +0.8
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +1.2
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Jared McCain 12.9m
8
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.6

Defensive liabilities (-0.8) slightly outweighed his steady perimeter shot-making, resulting in a marginal -1.2 net score. He provided a decent scoring spark off the bench but gave too much ground on the other end of the floor.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 57.1%
USG% 21.2%
Net Rtg -1.5
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.9m
Scoring +4.9
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
LAL Los Angeles Lakers
S Austin Reaves 39.1m
11
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
-5.2

A brutal shooting slump cratered his overall impact (-11.1) as he forced up low-quality looks throughout the night. While he provided excellent defensive value (+8.1) and active hustle, the sheer volume of wasted offensive possessions completely derailed his overall grade.

Shooting
FG 3/16 (18.8%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 30.2%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg -1.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.1m
Scoring +0.6
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +4.1
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 27
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Luka Dončić 39.0m
31
pts
15
reb
11
ast
Impact
+16.7

Heavy volume masked significant inefficiency, as a barrage of missed perimeter shots dragged down his offensive value. However, stellar defensive metrics (+8.6) and relentless rebounding kept his net impact positive (+3.5) despite the poor shot selection.

Shooting
FG 9/24 (37.5%)
3PT 2/9 (22.2%)
FT 11/14 (78.6%)
Advanced
TS% 51.4%
USG% 38.6%
Net Rtg +13.7
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.0m
Scoring +19.2
Creation +2.4
Shot Making +6.0
Hustle +6.4
Defense +0.7
Turnovers -10.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 21.4%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 5
S Rui Hachimura 36.1m
17
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+8.9

Despite doubling his recent scoring average with solid efficiency, his overall impact slipped into the negative (-0.9). A lack of defensive resistance (-0.4) and missing secondary playmaking elements offset the value of his perimeter shot-making.

Shooting
FG 7/12 (58.3%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 70.8%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +6.3
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.1m
Scoring +12.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +4.7
Hustle +4.7
Defense -2.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 26.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S LeBron James 34.2m
29
pts
7
reb
6
ast
Impact
+27.1

Elite shot-making fueled a massive +14.9 overall impact, shattering his recent scoring average with highly efficient perimeter execution. His defensive metrics (+5.9) remained robust, ensuring this offensive explosion translated directly to winning value rather than empty calories.

Shooting
FG 12/17 (70.6%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 81.1%
USG% 25.6%
Net Rtg -1.7
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.2m
Scoring +24.4
Creation +2.7
Shot Making +7.6
Hustle +5.0
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Deandre Ayton 31.4m
14
pts
12
reb
2
ast
Impact
+21.2

Flawless execution around the rim anchored a stellar +11.0 net impact, continuing a streak of hyper-efficient interior play. He paired this perfect shooting night with strong defensive positioning (+5.1) and active hustle (+3.2) to dominate the paint on both ends.

Shooting
FG 7/7 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 10.1%
Net Rtg +13.8
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.4m
Scoring +14.0
Creation +2.8
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +14.3
Defense -0.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
Gabe Vincent 19.1m
3
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.5

Negative defensive metrics (-1.1) and a complete lack of offensive rhythm tanked his overall impact score (-8.3). He operated mostly as a bystander on the perimeter, failing to tilt the defense or disrupt the opponent's flow.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 6.8%
Net Rtg -23.8
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.1m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Jake LaRavia 17.0m
4
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-15.0

Minimal offensive involvement and poor shot selection resulted in a steep -8.1 overall impact during his rotation minutes. He failed to generate any meaningful rim pressure, and his slight positive contributions in hustle (+1.2) weren't enough to salvage a passive stint.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.0%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg +38.1
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.0m
Scoring +1.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 11.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Jaxson Hayes 16.5m
3
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.4

High-energy hustle plays (+5.2) defined this brief stint, keeping his overall impact slightly above water (+0.7). Though his recent scoring surge vanished due to a lack of touches, his commitment to doing the dirty work on the glass and in rotation provided steady value.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/4 (25.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.3%
USG% 7.7%
Net Rtg -14.0
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.5m
Scoring +1.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +5.4
Defense -2.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.9

A cardio-only appearance yielded a -1.9 net impact, as he failed to register a single meaningful offensive statistic. His brief stint lacked the defensive disruption needed to justify floor time.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -56.4
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.4m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-15.0

Defensive lapses (-0.8) during a very brief cameo pushed his impact into the red (-2.5). He was unable to establish his usual physical presence, rushing his lone offensive touch before being subbed out.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg -11.9
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.1m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0