Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
BOS lead NYK lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
NYK 2P — 3P —
BOS 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 175 attempts

NYK NYK Shot-making Δ

Brunson Hard 12/21 +8.1
Hart 7/14 +1.1
Alvarado Hard 5/12 -0.2
Bridges 5/10 0.0
Towns 3/9 -3.7
Shamet Hard 1/5 -1.6
Diawara Hard 4/4 +6.2
Kolek Hard 2/2 +4.2
Robinson Open 1/2 -0.6
McCullar Jr. Hard 0/2 -1.9

BOS BOS Shot-making Δ

Brown 11/25 -4.0
White Hard 7/14 +2.3
Vučević 5/13 -2.5
Pritchard Hard 2/9 -3.4
Scheierman Hard 3/8 -0.5
González Hard 1/5 -3.1
Harper Jr. Hard 1/5 -3.2
Queta Open 2/4 -1.4
Garza 1/4 -2.6
Walsh Open 1/4 -3.4
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
NYK
BOS
40/83 Field Goals 34/92
48.2% Field Goal % 37.0%
14/35 3-Pointers 7/41
40.0% 3-Point % 17.1%
17/24 Free Throws 14/15
70.8% Free Throw % 93.3%
59.3% True Shooting % 45.1%
57 Total Rebounds 54
7 Offensive 14
39 Defensive 30
23 Assists 22
2.88 Assist/TO Ratio 2.20
8 Turnovers 10
5 Steals 4
3 Blocks 3
17 Fouls 21
38 Points in Paint 52
16 Fast Break Pts 4
14 Points off TOs 3
11 Second Chance Pts 9
33 Bench Points 24
24 Largest Lead 2
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Jalen Brunson
31 PTS · 3 REB · 8 AST · 33.2 MIN
+22.85
2
Derrick White
19 PTS · 1 REB · 4 AST · 34.2 MIN
+15.27
3
Jaylen Brown
26 PTS · 2 REB · 4 AST · 33.1 MIN
+14.31
4
Mikal Bridges
14 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST · 30.4 MIN
+13.46
5
Mohamed Diawara
10 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 26.5 MIN
+11.45
6
Baylor Scheierman
10 PTS · 13 REB · 5 AST · 29.2 MIN
+11.26
7
Josh Hart
19 PTS · 6 REB · 3 AST · 26.3 MIN
+10.5
8
Jose Alvarado
12 PTS · 2 REB · 2 AST · 25.1 MIN
+9.8
9
Payton Pritchard
6 PTS · 2 REB · 7 AST · 30.5 MIN
+8.74
10
Tyler Kolek
6 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST · 3.8 MIN
+6.0
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:14 J. Walsh REBOUND (Off:3 Def:3) 111–89
Q4 0:16 MISS K. McCullar Jr. 25' pullup 3PT 111–89
Q4 0:33 T. Jemison III REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 111–89
Q4 0:35 MISS H. González 25' 3PT 111–89
Q4 0:54 R. Harper Jr. REBOUND (Off:1 Def:2) 111–89
Q4 0:55 MISS K. McCullar Jr. 18' pullup Shot 111–89
Q4 1:06 L. Garza Free Throw 2 of 2 (6 PTS) 111–89
Q4 1:06 L. Garza Free Throw 1 of 2 (5 PTS) 111–88
Q4 1:06 K. McCullar Jr. shooting personal FOUL (1 PF) (Garza 2 FT) 111–87
Q4 1:20 A. Williams REBOUND (Off:1 Def:1) 111–87
Q4 1:21 MISS A. Hukporti 27' 3PT 111–87
Q4 1:37 J. Walsh lost ball out-of-bounds TURNOVER (1 TO) 111–87
Q4 2:01 T. Kolek 27' 3PT pullup (6 PTS) 111–87
Q4 2:12 R. Harper Jr. 11' pullup Jump Shot (3 PTS) 108–87
Q4 2:28 T. Kolek 27' 3PT running pullup (3 PTS) (P. Dadiet 1 AST) 108–85

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

BOS Boston Celtics
S Derrick White 34.2m
19
pts
1
reb
4
ast
Impact
+14.3

A high offensive workload was largely negated by uncharacteristic defensive lapses that dragged down his total score. A pattern of losing his man on back-door cuts erased the value of his perimeter shot-making.

Shooting
FG 7/14 (50.0%)
3PT 3/9 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.8%
USG% 19.0%
Net Rtg -17.0
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.2m
Scoring +13.6
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +5.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Jaylen Brown 33.1m
26
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
+14.7

High-volume inefficiency from the perimeter severely capped what could have been a dominant offensive rating. A persistent pattern of forcing contested mid-range pull-ups dragged down his overall efficiency.

Shooting
FG 11/25 (44.0%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 48.6%
USG% 36.4%
Net Rtg -20.9
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.1m
Scoring +16.6
Creation +2.9
Shot Making +5.2
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.3
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
10
pts
13
reb
5
ast
Impact
+7.1

Relentless rebounding and high-level hustle metrics completely offset a poor shooting night. A pattern of tracking down long rebounds generated crucial second-chance opportunities.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.3%
USG% 15.9%
Net Rtg -2.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.2m
Scoring +6.1
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +9.7
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Neemias Queta 22.8m
4
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.6

Severe struggles anchoring the paint and likely foul trouble absolutely tanked his overall impact. A pattern of biting on pump fakes compromised the interior defense repeatedly.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 14.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.8m
Scoring +1.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +6.3
Defense -4.0
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Luka Garza 15.3m
6
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.0

Poor spacing and defensive liabilities in the pick-and-roll resulted in a negative overall showing. A pattern of bricked trail-threes stalled the secondary offense.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.1%
USG% 16.2%
Net Rtg -20.0
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.3m
Scoring +3.5
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +2.8
Defense -2.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
2
reb
7
ast
Impact
+2.3

Abysmal perimeter shooting cratered his offensive value despite surprisingly elite defensive metrics. A glaring pattern of clanking wide-open spot-up looks killed multiple offensive runs.

Shooting
FG 2/9 (22.2%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 31.8%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -45.0
+/- -27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.5m
Scoring +0.9
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +2.5
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
11
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.3

Inefficient post touches and missed trail-threes dragged his impact into the red. Despite a pattern of excellent effort on the offensive glass, his inability to finish heavily penalized the team.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 42.3%
USG% 27.8%
Net Rtg -49.4
+/- -24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.5m
Scoring +4.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +4.7
Defense -2.9
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
3
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.7

Complete offensive disjointedness and poor shot selection resulted in a disastrous overall rating. A pattern of forcing contested drives into heavy traffic led to empty, momentum-killing trips.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 25.5%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg -45.1
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.3m
Scoring -0.4
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +2.8
Defense -1.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
Jordan Walsh 12.8m
2
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.6

Elite defensive versatility and high-energy rotations completely salvaged a poor shooting performance. A pattern of blowing up dribble hand-offs on the perimeter defined his highly disruptive stint.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 13.5%
Net Rtg -30.9
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.8m
Scoring -0.5
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +5.7
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.5

Rushed perimeter attempts and an inability to find the flow of the offense severely damaged his impact. A pattern of settling for early-clock threes bailed out the opposing defense.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 20.0%
USG% 16.1%
Net Rtg -36.7
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.5m
Scoring -0.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.1

A lack of offensive assertiveness and missed rotations led to a slightly negative short shift. A pattern of getting sealed off too easily in the post allowed quick opponent scores.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 7.7%
Net Rtg -22.2
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.7m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
NYK New York Knicks
S Jalen Brunson 33.2m
31
pts
3
reb
8
ast
Impact
+24.4

Masterful shot creation and elite finishing in the paint drove a massive positive impact. His ability to consistently break down the primary defender fueled a dominant offensive stretch in the second half.

Shooting
FG 12/21 (57.1%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.4%
USG% 33.8%
Net Rtg +34.9
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.2m
Scoring +24.8
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +8.2
Hustle +2.8
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 18.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Mikal Bridges 30.4m
14
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+13.5

Defensive rotations drove his positive impact, effectively shutting down the perimeter. A pattern of timely closeouts compensated for a relatively quiet offensive night.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.8%
USG% 17.2%
Net Rtg +6.8
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.4m
Scoring +10.4
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +5.1
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
11
pts
10
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.7

Offensive passivity and missed perimeter looks cratered his overall impact despite surprisingly stout interior defense. A pattern of settling for contested mid-range jumpers rather than attacking the rim limited his effectiveness.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 47.3%
USG% 23.4%
Net Rtg +21.2
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.4m
Scoring +6.4
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +3.0
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -6.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 43.8%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Landry Shamet 27.8m
3
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-4.5

Bricklaying from beyond the arc heavily penalized his overall value. A glaring pattern of blown defensive assignments and empty offensive trips completely derailed his minutes.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 30.0%
USG% 8.5%
Net Rtg -1.9
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.8m
Scoring -0.1
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +2.2
Defense -0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Josh Hart 26.3m
19
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+7.9

Relentless transition pushes and secondary scoring fueled a massive box score spike. His pattern of crashing the glass and generating extra possessions kept the offense humming.

Shooting
FG 7/14 (50.0%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 60.3%
USG% 29.8%
Net Rtg +26.3
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.3m
Scoring +13.6
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +1.8
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
10
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+4.3

Flawless shot selection and high-energy hustle plays maximized his limited touches. A pattern of perfectly timed baseline cuts yielded easy buckets and swung momentum.

Shooting
FG 4/4 (100.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 125.0%
USG% 6.8%
Net Rtg +45.5
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.5m
Scoring +10.0
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +0.9
Defense -0.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
12
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.2

Absolute chaos creation on the defensive end resulted in elite hustle and defensive metrics. His signature pattern of full-court pressure disrupted the opponent's offensive rhythm from the opening tip.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 24.5%
Net Rtg +29.0
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.1m
Scoring +7.0
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +0.6
Defense +4.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 1
5
pts
9
reb
2
ast
Impact
+4.5

Elite rim protection and constant activity in the painted area generated significant defensive value. A pattern of altering shots at the basket completely masked his lack of offensive involvement.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/8 (37.5%)
Advanced
TS% 45.3%
USG% 16.2%
Net Rtg +49.1
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.0m
Scoring +1.2
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +10.5
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.0

Defensive engagement surprisingly salvaged an empty offensive stint. He established a pattern of staying in front of his man, preventing dribble penetration during a brief rotation appearance.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 5.3%
Net Rtg +65.0
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.5m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.4

Ineffective positioning on both ends resulted in a slight negative drag during garbage time. He showed a pattern of being a step slow on defensive rotations.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +28.6
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.8m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.4

Rushed offensive execution and missed jumpers quickly sank his impact during a brief cameo. A pattern of forcing shots early in the shot clock led to empty possessions.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg +28.6
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.8m
Scoring -1.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.9

Instant perimeter offense provided a massive per-minute boost to the overall rating. A quick pattern of spotting up in transition punished the retreating defense.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg +28.6
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.8m
Scoring +6.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.0

Active hands and solid positional awareness generated a quick defensive boost. A pattern of denying entry passes kept his brief stint in the green.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +42.9
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.5m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.3

Minimal involvement on either end of the floor left him with a slightly negative baseline score. He established no rhythm, mostly floating on the perimeter during his short run.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +53.3
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.8m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0