MEM

2025-26 Season

JA MORANT

Memphis Grizzlies | Guard | 6-2
Ja Morant
19.4 PPG
3.2 RPG
8.1 APG
28.4 MPG
-0.2 Impact

Morant produces at an average rate for a 28-minute workload. 3.5 turnovers per game cost 6.8 points of value nightly.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-0.2
Scoring +11.1
Points 19.4 PPG × +1.00 = +19.4
Missed 2PT 6.2/g × -0.78 = -4.9
Missed 3PT 3.2/g × -0.87 = -2.8
Missed FT 0.6/g × -1.00 = -0.6
Creation +5.0
Assists 8.1/g × +0.50 = +4.0
Off. Rebounds 0.8/g × +1.26 = +1.0
Turnovers -6.8
Turnovers 3.5/g × -1.95 = -6.8
Defense +1.4
Steals 1.0/g × +2.30 = +2.3
Blocks 0.3/g × +0.90 = +0.3
Def. Rebounds 2.4/g × +0.30 = +0.7
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +3.7
Contested Shots 1.7/g × +0.20 = +0.3
Deflections 2.4/g × +0.65 = +1.6
Charges Drawn 0.1/g × +2.70 = +0.3
Loose Balls 0.6/g × +0.60 = +0.4
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.4/g uncredited × +2.70 = +1.1
Raw Impact +14.4
Baseline (game-average expected) −14.6
Net Impact
-0.2
67th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 236 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 90th
19.4 PPG
Efficiency 38th
53.2% TS
Playmaking 98th
8.1 APG
Rebounding 57th
3.2 RPG
Rim Protection 46th
0.11/min
Hustle 78th
0.13/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 1th
0.12/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

A wildly erratic start to the season defined Ja Morant's first twenty games, revealing a frustrating tug-of-war between explosive downhill dominance and self-destructive shot selection. When he played with patience, he was completely unguardable. Look at his brilliant performance on 10/22 vs NOP, where a masterclass in relentless downhill attacking yielded 35 points and a massive +16.1 impact score. Yet, he too often fell in love with forcing wild attempts into heavy traffic. On 11/11 vs NYK, despite tallying 16 points and 10 assists, his insistence on chucking bad interior looks resulted in a disastrous -21.3 impact. Even when his shot actually fell, hidden costs frequently dragged him into the red. During the 12/28 vs WAS matchup, he scored an efficient 21 points, but careless high-leverage turnovers and lazy defensive lapses in transition wiped out that offensive production to leave him with a -2.6 impact. Morant remains an elite dual-threat weapon, but his refusal to stop forcing the issue against set defenses continues to sabotage his overall value.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Morant's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~8 points per game.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 37% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Defensive difference-maker. Morant consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -2.3, second-half: +1.9. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Hot right now — 4 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 4 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 19 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

M. Smart 61.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 8
D. Daniels 31.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
C. Wallace 31.3 poss
FG% 22.2%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.19
PTS 6
A. Black 28.8 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 7
A. Thompson 28.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 7
M. Bridges 27.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
H. Jones 23.6 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.59
PTS 14
A. Bailey 22.6 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.27
PTS 6
B. Sheppard 21.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 5
K. Dunn 20.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

M. Smart 78.6 poss
FG% 72.7%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 19
D. Robinson 37.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 3
C. Wallace 34.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 6
B. Podziemski 33.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 80.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 12
A. Black 28.7 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.28
PTS 8
L. Shamet 26.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 7
H. Jones 25.9 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 8
A. Green 24.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.24
PTS 6
M. Christie 24.7 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.36
PTS 9
T. Eason 24.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 5

SEASON STATS

20
Games
19.4
PPG
3.2
RPG
8.1
APG
1.0
SPG
0.3
BPG
41.0
FG%
23.5
3P%
89.7
FT%
28.4
MPG

GAME LOG

20 games played