SAC

2025-26 Season

PRECIOUS ACHIUWA

Sacramento Kings | Forward | 6-8
Precious Achiuwa
9.8 PPG
6.7 RPG
1.3 APG
23.5 MPG
+2.9 Impact

Achiuwa produces at an above average rate for a 24-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+2.9
Scoring +6.2
Points 9.8 PPG × +1.00 = +9.8
Missed 2PT 2.7/g × -0.78 = -2.1
Missed 3PT 0.9/g × -0.87 = -0.8
Missed FT 0.7/g × -1.00 = -0.7
Creation +2.8
Assists 1.3/g × +0.50 = +0.7
Off. Rebounds 1.7/g × +1.26 = +2.1
Turnovers -1.6
Turnovers 0.8/g × -1.95 = -1.6
Defense +2.3
Steals 0.9/g × +2.30 = +2.1
Blocks 0.7/g × +0.90 = +0.6
Def. Rebounds 5.0/g × +0.30 = +1.5
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.9
Contested Shots 5.5/g × +0.20 = +1.1
Deflections 1.8/g × +0.65 = +1.2
Loose Balls 0.5/g × +0.60 = +0.3
Screen Assists 0.8/g × +0.30 = +0.2
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +12.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.7
Net Impact
+2.9
81st pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 57th
10.1 PPG
Efficiency 36th
55.1% TS
Playmaking 35th
1.3 APG
Rebounding 89th
6.9 RPG
Rim Protection 83th
0.19/min
Hustle 65th
0.12/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 80th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

A maddeningly erratic role defined Precious Achiuwa’s early season, oscillating wildly between game-changing physicality and complete offensive invisibility. When he embraced his identity as a gritty enforcer, his value soared regardless of his scoring totals. Look at the 11/22 vs DEN matchup, where he managed just 7 points but posted a massive +8.1 impact by generating extra possessions through sheer force. Conversely, his box score numbers occasionally masked hidden costs to the team's offensive flow. During the 11/09 vs MIN game, he tallied a robust 12 points and 10 rebounds, yet finished with a -0.3 impact because poor screen-setting and clogged spacing actively derailed possessions. He was at his absolute best when playing decisively instead of forcing the issue. On 11/26 vs PHX, Achiuwa ruthlessly punished mismatches in the paint, converting 6 of his 7 shots for 14 points to drive a stellar +10.2 impact score. Ultimately, his effectiveness relies entirely on staying within his limits, as forcing wild shots or floating away from the action immediately tanks his value.

This stretch of the season was defined by extreme volatility, with Precious Achiuwa oscillating wildly between frontcourt wrecking ball and complete offensive zero. When fully dialed in, he was an absolute menace. He peaked on 01/14 vs NYK with a massive +15.9 impact score, driven by a 20-point, 14-rebound double-double and suffocating rim protection (+5.4 def). Even when his shot abandoned him, Achiuwa often found ways to tilt the floor through sheer grit. During a quiet six-point offensive outing on 01/27 vs NYK, he still generated a +4.4 impact by anchoring the paint and racking up a dominant +7.2 hustle score. Yet, his clunky interior finishing and disappearing acts sometimes dragged his overall footprint firmly into the negative. Look no further than 01/02 vs PHX, where a brutal 1-for-8 shooting night resulted in a disastrous -10.6 impact score.

This twenty-game stretch was defined by a volatile but spectacular breakout, as Precious Achiuwa morphed from a low-minute energy guy into a dominant frontcourt battering ram. Even when his offensive touch vanished, his relentless motor salvaged his value. On 02/09 vs NOP, he managed just 8 points but still posted a +4.3 impact score because his elite defensive anchoring completely locked down the paint. When his jumper actually connected, he looked utterly unstoppable. He erupted for 29 points and 12 rebounds on 02/26 vs DAL, generating a massive +27.4 impact score through flawless perimeter execution and elite shot selection. However, a lack of discipline still haunts him on bad nights. During the 02/25 vs HOU matchup, a severe regression in finishing quality cratered his overall impact to a miserable -9.8 despite grabbing 10 rebounds. As long as he avoids forcing contested looks at the rim, his relentless interior physicality makes him a terrifying two-way matchup.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Achiuwa's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~7 points per game.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 75% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Defensive difference-maker. Achiuwa consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: +1.8, second-half: +3.9. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 69 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

Z. Williamson 77.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 6
J. Randle 63.9 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.17
PTS 11
N. Reid 62.3 poss
FG% 85.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 14
P. Banchero 60.4 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 10
K. Durant 50.1 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 5
O. Anunoby 45.5 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 13
A. Sengun 44.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 10
C. Flagg 41.6 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
L. James 41.5 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
D. Barlow 39.1 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 10

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

Z. Williamson 91.6 poss
FG% 72.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 35
K. Durant 79.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 12.5%
PPP 0.19
PTS 15
J. Randle 77.4 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 19
P. Banchero 70.1 poss
FG% 41.2%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 18
L. James 62.0 poss
FG% 53.8%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 19
N. Jokić 59.2 poss
FG% 61.9%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.57
PTS 34
A. Sengun 48.6 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 13
N. Marshall 46.2 poss
FG% 22.2%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 5
N. Reid 43.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 9
O. Ighodaro 39.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

68
Games
9.8
PPG
6.7
RPG
1.3
APG
0.9
SPG
0.7
BPG
53.9
FG%
31.0
3P%
57.7
FT%
23.5
MPG

GAME LOG

68 games played