Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
LAL lead MEM lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
MEM 2P — 3P —
LAL 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 180 attempts

MEM MEM Shot-making Δ

Wells Hard 8/16 +3.0
Jackson Jr. 6/14 -2.1
Aldama 4/13 -6.5
Jackson 4/10 -2.3
Spencer Hard 1/10 -8.3
Coward 6/9 +4.2
Landale 5/9 +0.8
Caldwell-Pope Hard 3/8 -0.5
Koloko 3/6 -0.5
Small Open 2/5 -2.1

LAL LAL Shot-making Δ

Dončić Hard 10/20 +7.6
LaRavia 9/16 +4.4
James 8/14 +3.1
Ayton 6/8 +3.5
Vanderbilt 3/7 -2.3
Knecht Hard 1/5 -2.6
Smart Hard 1/5 -3.0
Smith Jr. Hard 0/4 -3.5
Hayes Hard 0/1 -0.9
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
MEM
LAL
42/100 Field Goals 38/80
42.0% Field Goal % 47.5%
10/41 3-Pointers 11/41
24.4% 3-Point % 26.8%
20/22 Free Throws 33/41
90.9% Free Throw % 80.5%
52.0% True Shooting % 61.2%
53 Total Rebounds 57
16 Offensive 8
31 Defensive 37
29 Assists 30
3.22 Assist/TO Ratio 2.73
8 Turnovers 10
6 Steals 4
1 Blocks 6
31 Fouls 18
58 Points in Paint 46
13 Fast Break Pts 13
17 Points off TOs 6
18 Second Chance Pts 15
43 Bench Points 11
16 Largest Lead 9
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Luka Dončić
36 PTS · 9 REB · 8 AST · 38.9 MIN
+28.8
2
Jake LaRavia
26 PTS · 5 REB · 4 AST · 34.5 MIN
+26.2
3
LeBron James
26 PTS · 7 REB · 10 AST · 37.3 MIN
+24.8
4
Jock Landale
13 PTS · 10 REB · 3 AST · 28.6 MIN
+19.31
5
Cedric Coward
16 PTS · 8 REB · 1 AST · 12.6 MIN
+17.99
6
Deandre Ayton
15 PTS · 8 REB · 1 AST · 33.6 MIN
+15.85
7
Jaylen Wells
23 PTS · 1 REB · 2 AST · 24.5 MIN
+14.52
8
Santi Aldama
12 PTS · 10 REB · 7 AST · 30.7 MIN
+10.29
9
Javon Small
7 PTS · 3 REB · 5 AST · 16.1 MIN
+9.27
10
GG Jackson
11 PTS · 6 REB · 1 AST · 21.9 MIN
+7.1
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:02 L. James REBOUND (Off:0 Def:7) 114–120
Q4 0:02 MISS J. Wells 27' pullup 3PT 114–120
Q4 0:06 L. Dončić Free Throw 2 of 2 (36 PTS) 114–120
Q4 0:06 L. Dončić Free Throw 1 of 2 (35 PTS) 114–119
Q4 0:06 S. Aldama take personal FOUL (4 PF) (Dončić 2 FT) 114–118
Q4 0:09 J. Wells 26' 3PT (23 PTS) (S. Aldama 7 AST) 114–118
Q4 0:14 M. Smart Free Throw 2 of 2 (6 PTS) 111–118
Q4 0:14 M. Smart Free Throw 1 of 2 (5 PTS) 111–117
Q4 0:14 C. Spencer personal FOUL (5 PF) (Smart 2 FT) 111–116
Q4 0:16 J. Wells putback Layup (20 PTS) 111–116
Q4 0:16 J. Wells REBOUND (Off:1 Def:0) 109–116
Q4 0:18 MISS J. Wells 26' 3PT 109–116
Q4 0:23 D. Ayton bad pass out-of-bounds TURNOVER (1 TO) 109–116
Q4 0:23 D. Ayton REBOUND (Off:1 Def:7) 109–116
Q4 0:26 MISS J. Jackson Jr. 3PT 109–116

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

LAL Los Angeles Lakers
S Luka Dončić 38.9m
36
pts
9
reb
8
ast
Impact
+32.7

Systematically dismantling the defensive scheme with a steady diet of step-back jumpers and pinpoint skip passes carried the unit to a massive net positive. His overwhelming offensive gravity and elite shot-making proved impossible to contain.

Shooting
FG 10/20 (50.0%)
3PT 4/10 (40.0%)
FT 12/13 (92.3%)
Advanced
TS% 70.0%
USG% 31.5%
Net Rtg +11.3
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.9m
Scoring +28.1
Creation +2.6
Shot Making +7.3
Hustle +9.5
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 24
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 45.8%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
S LeBron James 37.3m
26
pts
7
reb
10
ast
Impact
+18.6

Dictating the tempo from start to finish, masterful offensive orchestration and highly efficient shot creation drove a massive positive impact. His ability to manipulate defensive coverages in the half-court generated countless high-quality looks.

Shooting
FG 8/14 (57.1%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 8/10 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 70.7%
USG% 22.4%
Net Rtg +11.2
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.3m
Scoring +20.5
Creation +4.2
Shot Making +4.1
Hustle +2.1
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Jake LaRavia 34.5m
26
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
+20.1

Exploding for a spectacular scoring output far beyond his typical production completely tilted the game in his team's favor. He punished defensive lapses with confident perimeter shooting, capitalizing on every open window to drive a massive positive impact.

Shooting
FG 9/16 (56.2%)
3PT 4/10 (40.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 73.2%
USG% 22.0%
Net Rtg +19.2
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.5m
Scoring +20.6
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +5.5
Hustle +5.4
Defense -0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Deandre Ayton 33.6m
15
pts
8
reb
1
ast
Impact
+10.0

Anchoring the paint with disciplined drop coverage sustained his positive value throughout the night. Elite interior defense and hyper-efficient finishing forced opponents into tough, contested floaters.

Shooting
FG 6/8 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/6 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 70.5%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg +10.6
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.6m
Scoring +11.8
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +6.3
Defense +0.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 52.6%
STL 1
BLK 3
TO 1
S Marcus Smart 31.1m
6
pts
1
reb
4
ast
Impact
-12.5

While he provided tremendous hustle and defensive tenacity, those traits couldn't fully mask the damage done by his offensive limitations. Bricked jumpers and stalled possessions dragged his net impact into the red despite his characteristic grit.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.4%
USG% 11.0%
Net Rtg -0.8
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.1m
Scoring +2.5
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense -2.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
7
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
-9.8

Since opponents completely ignored him on the perimeter, offensive spacing issues severely hampered his overall effectiveness. This clogged the driving lanes and stalled the half-court attack, negating his usual defensive energy.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.4%
USG% 19.6%
Net Rtg +1.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.9m
Scoring +3.3
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +4.0
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-15.2

Disastrous defensive miscommunications and empty offensive possessions resulted in a highly negative stint on the floor. Forcing bad shots early in the clock allowed the opponent to leak out in transition and build momentum.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 11.4%
Net Rtg -8.3
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.3m
Scoring -3.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Jaxson Hayes 14.4m
1
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.6

Dropping off suddenly from his recent highly efficient stretch left him completely neutralized as a roll man. Failing to establish deep post position or impact the game defensively resulted in a negative overall stint.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 26.6%
USG% 5.9%
Net Rtg +3.4
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.4m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +7.6
Defense -3.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-14.1

Struggling to find a rhythm and executing poorly on offense sank his net rating in limited action. Rushed attempts against tight closeouts prevented him from providing the bench spark his team desperately needed.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 30.0%
USG% 21.9%
Net Rtg -3.7
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.9m
Scoring -0.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -6.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
MEM Memphis Grizzlies
S Cam Spencer 34.0m
5
pts
2
reb
9
ast
Impact
-15.0

Whenever he looked to score, abysmal shot selection completely derailed the offense and resulted in a team-worst impact score. While his playmaking generated some positive momentum, the sheer volume of wasted possessions via forced jumpers made him a massive liability.

Shooting
FG 1/10 (10.0%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 22.1%
USG% 15.1%
Net Rtg -1.6
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.0m
Scoring -1.5
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense -2.8
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
14
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.4

Despite decent usage, inefficiency and an inability to generate defensive stops cratered his overall value. Settling for heavily contested mid-range looks disrupted the offensive flow, leading to a severely negative net rating.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 18.4%
Net Rtg -2.8
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.7m
Scoring +7.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +0.9
Defense -3.7
Turnovers -4.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 63.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Jock Landale 28.6m
13
pts
10
reb
3
ast
Impact
+13.8

By dominating the glass and finishing highly efficiently around the rim, he fueled a stellar impact score. He consistently won the physical battles in the paint against opposing bigs, providing a reliable anchor on both ends of the floor.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.8%
USG% 14.1%
Net Rtg -6.4
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.6m
Scoring +9.8
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +12.7
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Jaylen Wells 24.5m
23
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
+8.2

Scoring well above his recent averages drove a strong positive impact, though defensive lapses capped his overall ceiling. His aggressive shot creation forced the defense to adjust, opening up the floor during key stretches of the second half.

Shooting
FG 8/16 (50.0%)
3PT 3/11 (27.3%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.8%
USG% 27.0%
Net Rtg -22.8
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.5m
Scoring +16.8
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +5.3
Hustle +1.3
Defense -4.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Cedric Coward 12.6m
16
pts
8
reb
1
ast
Impact
+14.7

Capitalizing on almost every offensive touch while providing stout perimeter defense defined this elite per-minute outing. His ability to instantly shift the momentum off the bench made him a highly disruptive two-way force.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 81.0%
USG% 31.4%
Net Rtg +48.1
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.6m
Scoring +13.8
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +8.2
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Santi Aldama 30.7m
12
pts
10
reb
7
ast
Impact
+4.1

Even with a brutal shooting night, excellent connective passing and relentless hustle plays kept his impact positive. He found ways to influence the game without scoring, particularly by generating second-chance opportunities and rotating perfectly on defense.

Shooting
FG 4/13 (30.8%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 38.4%
USG% 21.6%
Net Rtg +6.7
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.7m
Scoring +4.2
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +11.7
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 35.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
7
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.7

Missing open perimeter looks and lacking offensive assertiveness dragged down his overall value. Even with solid point-of-attack defense, his inability to stretch the floor or punish closeouts allowed the opposition to sag into the paint.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 43.8%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg -23.5
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.8m
Scoring +3.4
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
GG Jackson 21.9m
11
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.5

Active hands and timely defensive reads offset a noticeable dip in his usual scoring efficiency. He salvaged a mediocre shooting performance by crashing the glass and contesting shots effectively on the wing.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.6%
USG% 20.4%
Net Rtg -7.9
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.9m
Scoring +6.4
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +3.7
Defense -3.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
Javon Small 16.1m
7
pts
3
reb
5
ast
Impact
-0.0

Operating in a low-usage role, smart ball movement and disciplined defensive rotations kept his head above water. He managed the game effectively during his minutes, prioritizing high-percentage looks for teammates over forcing his own offense.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.4%
USG% 18.4%
Net Rtg -17.1
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.1m
Scoring +4.9
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +3.8
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
6
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.2

Executing basic rim-running duties resulted in a low-volume, low-mistake stint that neither helped nor hurt the team significantly. He filled his role adequately but failed to make a dent as a true interior deterrent.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 21.9%
Net Rtg -14.2
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.1m
Scoring +3.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +2.5
Defense -1.5
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1