BKN

2025-26 Season

MALACHI SMITH

Brooklyn Nets | Guard | 6-4
Malachi Smith
7.3 PPG
2.0 RPG
2.1 APG
18.4 MPG
+1.4 Impact

Smith produces at an above average rate for a 18-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+1.4
Scoring +5.0
Points 7.3 PPG × +1.00 = +7.3
Missed 2PT 1.6/g × -0.78 = -1.3
Missed 3PT 1.1/g × -0.87 = -1.0
Missed FT 0.0/g × -1.00 = -0.0
Creation +1.7
Assists 2.1/g × +0.50 = +1.1
Off. Rebounds 0.5/g × +1.26 = +0.6
Turnovers -1.9
Turnovers 1.0/g × -1.95 = -1.9
Defense +1.2
Steals 1.0/g × +2.30 = +2.3
Blocks 0.4/g × +0.90 = +0.4
Def. Rebounds 1.5/g × +0.30 = +0.4
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.2
Contested Shots 2.4/g × +0.20 = +0.5
Deflections 2.0/g × +0.65 = +1.3
Loose Balls 0.1/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.1/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.3
Raw Impact +8.2
Baseline (game-average expected) −6.8
Net Impact
+1.4
85th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Smith's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 60% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Smith consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -2.9, second-half: +4.9. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 10 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

S. Henderson 15.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Murray 15.2 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 3
M. Monk 14.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 3
C. Kispert 12.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
W. Richard 12.0 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.58
PTS 7
J. Holiday 11.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 2
D. McDermott 11.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 3
T. Camara 10.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 3
D. Carter 9.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

K. Murray 18.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
W. Richard 12.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Wesley 11.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 2
D. Carter 11.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 3
D. McDermott 11.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 3
M. Monk 11.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 3
J. Clarkson 10.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Holiday 9.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.92
PTS 9
D. Avdija 8.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Thybulle 8.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

9
Games
7.3
PPG
2.0
RPG
2.1
APG
1.0
SPG
0.4
BPG
52.0
FG%
52.4
3P%
100.0
FT%
18.4
MPG