CHA

2025-26 Season

TRE MANN

Charlotte Hornets | Guard | 6-4
Tre Mann
5.4PPG
1.7RPG
1.6APG
12.5MPG
-6.2 Impact

Mann produces at an poor rate for a 12-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-6.2
Scoring +4.2
Points Scored 5.4 PPG = +5.4
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -2.6
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.4
Creation +0.4
Assists & Self-Creation 1.6 AST/g + self-creation = +0.4
Turnovers -2.4
Turnovers 1.0/g (live + dead blend) = -2.4
Hustle & Effort +1.3
Rebounds 1.7 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.1
Contested Shots 1.4/g = +0.3
Deflections 0.9/g = +0.6
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.3/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.2/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +3.5
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.7
Net Impact
-6.2
13th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 28th
7.1 PPG
Efficiency 8th
45.3% TS
Playmaking 38th
2.1 APG
Rebounding 30th
2.3 RPG
Defense 15th
+4.7/g
Hustle 75th
+11.4/g
Creation 58th
+3.08/g
Shot Making 35th
+5.52/g
TO Discipline 19th
0.08/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

A brutal shooting slump and erratic decision-making defined Tre Mann's opening stretch to the 2025-26 campaign. Operating almost exclusively off the bench, the guard consistently derailed offensive possessions with forced jumpers. Look no further than the 10/28 vs MIA matchup, where he logged a dismal -10.1 Impact score. He managed just 8 points on an abysmal 3-for-15 shooting performance, sinking his team's momentum with terrible shot selection. Days earlier on 10/25 vs PHI, he posted a staggering -19.9 Impact score while missing all five of his three-point attempts, offering zero defensive effort to make up for his flat-lining offense. He did show brief flashes of utility when he didn't force the issue, like during the 10/22 vs BKN contest. Despite a relatively quiet 12-point scoring output, he still earned a +2.4 Impact score by creating vital non-scoring value through his 6 assists and unselfish ball movement. If he wants to stick in the rotation, he has to stop treating every touch like an absolute green light.

This stretch was defined by a brutal offensive slump that saw Tre Mann barely clinging to end-of-bench rotation minutes. His sole flash of brilliance arrived on 01/11 vs UTA, when he erupted for 20 points in just 12 minutes of action. By hitting 4 of his 6 three-point attempts, he acted as a pure scoring sparkplug to post a stellar +11.7 Impact score. But that explosive outing was a complete anomaly in a sea of dreadful shooting nights. Look no further than his 02/05 vs HOU appearance, where he bricked his way to a 1-for-10 shooting performance and an -8.5 Impact. Even with five rebounds and three assists, his abysmal shot selection actively derailed the offense. The wheels completely fell off during the 02/20 vs CLE matchup, resulting in a staggering -18.8 Impact in a mere 13 minutes. When a reserve guard cannot hit shots or defend without bleeding points, the hidden costs of their empty minutes quickly pile up.

Tre Mann's late-season stretch was defined by a brutal demotion to the end of the bench, turning him into a garbage-time afterthought. Despite scoring only seven points on 02/24 vs CHI, he managed a respectable +1.9 Impact score because he efficiently hit his shots and crashed the glass for four rebounds in just eight minutes. That fleeting spark was quickly extinguished by a crippling lack of rhythm. Look at his disastrous outing on 03/04 vs BOS. He registered a miserable -11.2 Impact score after missing all three of his shot attempts and failing to record a single counting stat in four empty minutes. He was equally invisible a day earlier on 03/03 vs DAL, putting up a literal row of zeros to earn a -12.1 Impact mark. When a guard plays limited minutes, they cannot afford to be an offensive black hole. Mann repeatedly tanked his advanced metrics by forcing cold jumpers instead of moving the ball, ensuring he remained strictly relegated to mop-up duty.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Mann has posted negative impact in 83% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 28% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: -4.9, second-half: -7.6. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

In a rough stretch — 16 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 16 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 68 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

C. McCollum 33.7 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.18
PTS 6
R. Rollins 28.8 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
D. Mitchell 27.8 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
P. Larsson 19.9 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 8
G. Trent Jr. 19.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
Q. Grimes 19.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Jaquez Jr. 18.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Smith 18.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Johnson 17.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.17
PTS 3
R. Sheppard 15.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

C. McCollum 26.8 poss
FG% 85.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.56
PTS 15
P. Larsson 25.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.28
PTS 7
D. Smith 25.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
G. Trent Jr. 24.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 8
C. Kispert 22.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
W. Clayton Jr. 21.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 8
K. Kuzma 19.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 6
Q. Grimes 19.2 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.73
PTS 14
D. Mitchell 18.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
T. Johnson 18.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

54
Games
5.4
PPG
1.7
RPG
1.6
APG
0.5
SPG
0.1
BPG
35.6
FG%
31.6
3P%
86.2
FT%
12.5
MPG

GAME LOG

54 games played