MIA

2025-26 Season

DRU SMITH

Miami Heat | Guard | 6-2
Dru Smith
5.6 PPG
2.5 RPG
2.6 APG
16.4 MPG
+1.8 Impact

Smith produces at an above average rate for a 16-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+1.8
Scoring +3.1
Points 5.6 PPG × +1.00 = +5.6
Missed 2PT 1.4/g × -0.78 = -1.1
Missed 3PT 1.3/g × -0.87 = -1.1
Missed FT 0.3/g × -1.00 = -0.3
Creation +2.1
Assists 2.6/g × +0.50 = +1.3
Off. Rebounds 0.6/g × +1.26 = +0.8
Turnovers -1.6
Turnovers 0.8/g × -1.95 = -1.6
Defense +2.2
Steals 1.4/g × +2.30 = +3.2
Blocks 0.3/g × +0.90 = +0.3
Def. Rebounds 1.9/g × +0.30 = +0.6
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +3.2
Contested Shots 2.5/g × +0.20 = +0.5
Deflections 2.8/g × +0.65 = +1.8
Charges Drawn 0.2/g × +2.70 = +0.5
Loose Balls 0.3/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.1/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.2
Raw Impact +9.0
Baseline (game-average expected) −7.2
Net Impact
+1.8
87th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 20th
5.9 PPG
Efficiency 68th
57.3% TS
Playmaking 52th
2.7 APG
Rebounding 42th
2.6 RPG
Rim Protection 99th
0.24/min
Hustle 99th
0.20/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 61th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Dru Smith's opening stretch of the season was defined by extreme volatility, toggling violently between defensive menace and offensive liability off the bench. Take his 11/05 vs DEN performance, where he scored a meager 5 points but still posted a stellar +8.1 impact score. That positive mark was entirely driven by his suffocating point-of-attack defense, which completely disrupted the opponent's offensive initiation despite his quiet scoring night. He reached his absolute peak shortly after on 11/08 vs POR, operating with surgical precision to rack up 13 points and 6 assists. By consistently finding the roll man and avoiding mistakes as a secondary creator, he generated a staggering +16.6 impact score. Yet, when his offensive aggression vanished, his overall value cratered. During a disastrous 11/24 vs DAL appearance, Smith went completely scoreless on 0-for-6 shooting, suffering a -6.9 impact score because his absolute nightmare of an offensive showing simply could not be masked by effort alone.

Dru Smith’s midseason stretch was defined by dizzying volatility, oscillating between spark-plug efficiency and total offensive invisibility. During a massive +13.3 impact performance on 01/08 vs CHI, he tallied 11 points, 5 rebounds, and 5 assists. That stellar rating was driven entirely by his relentless energy on loose balls, which completely shattered Chicago's offensive rhythm. Conversely, when his jumper vanished, his high-motor defense could barely mask the damage. On 12/18 vs BKN, he shot a disastrous 1-for-8 from the floor for a -1.5 impact, dragging the lineup into the mud despite his excellent gap discipline. Even worse than poor shooting was outright passivity. On 01/04 vs NOP, he took just a single shot in 19 minutes, generating a brutal -5.1 impact because his refusal to attack allowed his defender to roam freely and trap primary scorers. Smith is a gritty backcourt presence, but he simply cannot survive in an NBA rotation when he becomes a zero-threat offensive player.

Dru Smith spent this twenty-game stretch acting as a chaotic, defense-first wrecking ball who completely abandoned any pretense of scoring efficiency. Look at his 01/24 vs UTA performance, where he bricked his way to a 2-for-10 shooting night but still posted a massive +10.5 impact score. He offset that offensive ineptitude by grabbing 10 rebounds and transforming into a relentless terror on the defensive end. However, his lack of touch occasionally cratered his value, notably on 01/17 vs OKC. His horrific 1-for-8 finishing around the basket that night resulted in empty possessions that killed the offense, dragging his impact down to a dismal -4.7. When Smith actually managed to hit a few shots, he became a highly dangerous rotation piece. On 02/01 vs CHI, he tallied 10 points and 6 assists while putting on an absolute clinic in off-ball denial, earning a stellar +10.2 impact score. He remains a glaring floor-spacing liability, but his manic hustle ensures he always leaves a heavy imprint on the game.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Typical consistency. Smith is positive more often than not (57% of games) with scoring varying ~3 points from the average.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 46% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Smith consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 6 games. Longest cold streak: 4 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 76 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

T. Jones 43.3 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 8
J. Clarkson 39.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 10
A. Dosunmu 35.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. White 34.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 5
R. Rollins 31.9 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.22
PTS 7
Y. Kawamura 25.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 5
T. Kolek 25.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Mann 25.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
I. Quickley 23.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
A. Mitchell 23.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 4

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

A. Dosunmu 37.4 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 6
J. Fears 32.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
R. Rollins 31.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 7
T. Jones 31.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4
J. Clarkson 29.7 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 11
I. Collier 29.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 10
C. Cunningham 27.3 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 6
C. White 26.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.45
PTS 12
P. Pritchard 24.8 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 7
A. Black 23.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 9

SEASON STATS

69
Games
5.6
PPG
2.5
RPG
2.6
APG
1.4
SPG
0.3
BPG
41.6
FG%
30.2
3P%
82.5
FT%
16.4
MPG

GAME LOG

69 games played