GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

MIA Miami Heat
S Andrew Wiggins 24.5m
14
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+6.8

Locked down the point of attack, using his elite wingspan to completely disrupt the opponent's primary initiator. Even with a streaky jumper, his defensive versatility and timely weak-side cuts dictated the tempo of the game.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.6%
USG% 21.0%
Net Rtg +56.5
+/- +31
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.5m
Offense +11.5
Hustle +2.3
Defense +6.8
Raw total +20.6
Avg player in 24.5m -13.8
Impact +6.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 3
TO 0
S Pelle Larsson 23.6m
20
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
+8.3

Punished late closeouts with decisive straight-line drives and lethal catch-and-shoot daggers to continue a scorching stretch of efficiency. His constant off-ball relocation completely broke the defensive shell during key momentum swings.

Shooting
FG 8/11 (72.7%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 84.2%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg +61.2
+/- +33
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.6m
Offense +17.4
Hustle +1.1
Defense +3.1
Raw total +21.6
Avg player in 23.6m -13.3
Impact +8.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Bam Adebayo 22.2m
20
pts
9
reb
3
ast
Impact
+16.7

Absolutely dismantled interior coverages with decisive rolls while stretching the floor with a surprisingly confident outside stroke. His ability to switch onto quicker guards defensively without compromising rim protection created a nightmare matchup all night.

Shooting
FG 8/11 (72.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 78.4%
USG% 23.2%
Net Rtg +52.7
+/- +26
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.2m
Offense +19.6
Hustle +2.5
Defense +7.2
Raw total +29.3
Avg player in 22.2m -12.6
Impact +16.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 23.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Davion Mitchell 21.0m
13
pts
2
reb
6
ast
Impact
+13.0

Changed the game's complexion with relentless on-ball pressure that repeatedly forced opposing guards out of their sets. Pairing that defensive menace with timely perimeter shot-making resulted in a massive net positive for the rotation.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 72.2%
USG% 18.9%
Net Rtg +75.5
+/- +34
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.0m
Offense +11.8
Hustle +7.2
Defense +5.9
Raw total +24.9
Avg player in 21.0m -11.9
Impact +13.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
7
reb
4
ast
Impact
-3.9

Hesitation against closeouts and a failure to punish defensive gaps severely limited his offensive utility. Because he couldn't stretch the floor, his primary matchup freely roamed to disrupt actions in the paint.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 20.0%
USG% 13.0%
Net Rtg +59.4
+/- +24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.4m
Offense +2.8
Hustle +1.9
Defense +1.8
Raw total +6.5
Avg player in 18.4m -10.4
Impact -3.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
5
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
-7.4

Struggled to stay in front of quicker wings, bleeding points on straight-line drives that compromised the defensive shell. These lapses compounded a disjointed offensive showing where he consistently settled for bad angles in traffic.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 35.7%
USG% 12.1%
Net Rtg +30.2
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.5m
Offense +3.9
Hustle +1.6
Defense -0.3
Raw total +5.2
Avg player in 22.5m -12.6
Impact -7.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Dru Smith 21.2m
10
pts
4
reb
6
ast
Impact
+10.5

Put on an absolute clinic in off-ball denial and gap help, completely blowing up the opponent's pick-and-roll reads. That elite defensive execution and perfectly timed digs at the nail far outweighed a mediocre shooting line.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 57.1%
USG% 16.4%
Net Rtg +41.6
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.2m
Offense +10.4
Hustle +2.1
Defense +10.0
Raw total +22.5
Avg player in 21.2m -12.0
Impact +10.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
1
reb
9
ast
Impact
-5.3

Telegraphed too many passes into traffic, likely bleeding value through costly live-ball turnovers despite the high assist volume. Defenders completely sagged off his perimeter looks, which severely cramped the driving lanes for his teammates.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 36.8%
USG% 11.8%
Net Rtg +19.4
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.4m
Offense +3.0
Hustle +1.2
Defense +1.4
Raw total +5.6
Avg player in 19.4m -10.9
Impact -5.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
14
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.9

Forced the issue in isolation, resulting in contested mid-range looks that bailed out the defense. Despite decent counting stats, this inefficient shot diet stalled out several key offensive possessions and dragged his impact into the red.

Shooting
FG 6/15 (40.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 45.3%
USG% 30.0%
Net Rtg +21.6
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.2m
Offense +7.3
Hustle +0.4
Defense +1.3
Raw total +9.0
Avg player in 19.2m -10.9
Impact -1.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Kel'el Ware 18.4m
17
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+8.7

Feasted on smaller defenders in the post, finishing with authority around the rim to anchor the interior offense. While the three-point attempts were ill-advised, his sheer physical dominance on the block dictated the terms of engagement.

Shooting
FG 8/15 (53.3%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 56.7%
USG% 32.7%
Net Rtg +61.2
+/- +25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.4m
Offense +12.2
Hustle +2.0
Defense +4.7
Raw total +18.9
Avg player in 18.4m -10.2
Impact +8.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 21.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
9
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.7

Provided a brief but effective spark by sprinting the floor and finishing through contact in transition. Stayed perfectly within his role, capitalizing on defensive breakdowns to provide a quick jolt of energy.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.5%
USG% 24.2%
Net Rtg +14.8
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.0m
Offense +6.5
Hustle +0.8
Defense +0.2
Raw total +7.5
Avg player in 12.0m -6.8
Impact +0.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Jahmir Young 10.0m
2
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-2.4

Failed to generate meaningful separation off the bounce, leading to stagnant possessions when tasked with initiating the offense. A lack of physical resistance at the point of attack further diminished his brief stint on the floor.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 10.3%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.0m
Offense +2.9
Hustle +0.8
Defense -0.4
Raw total +3.3
Avg player in 10.0m -5.7
Impact -2.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.7

Sealed his man perfectly on the low block to convert high-percentage looks during a quick rotation shift. Brought immediate physicality to the paint that successfully stabilized the second-unit defense.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg -38.6
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.3m
Offense +4.5
Hustle +1.7
Defense +1.6
Raw total +7.8
Avg player in 7.3m -4.1
Impact +3.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
CHI Chicago Bulls
S Coby White 29.5m
16
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-11.0

Settling for heavily contested pull-ups short-circuited the half-court rhythm and fueled a massive negative swing. The barrage of long misses consistently compromised transition defense, turning potential stops into easy run-outs for the opposition.

Shooting
FG 4/13 (30.8%)
3PT 0/6 (0.0%)
FT 8/8 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 48.4%
USG% 25.3%
Net Rtg -61.0
+/- -42
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.5m
Offense +2.4
Hustle +2.0
Defense +1.3
Raw total +5.7
Avg player in 29.5m -16.7
Impact -11.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
S Ayo Dosunmu 26.2m
10
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.4

Driving into congested traffic resulted in empty possessions that snapped his recent streak of elite efficiency. While he battled defensively, an inability to finish through contact at the rim severely penalized his overall value.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 48.4%
USG% 21.3%
Net Rtg -75.9
+/- -46
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.2m
Offense +0.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.9
Raw total +4.4
Avg player in 26.2m -14.8
Impact -10.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Isaac Okoro 25.5m
9
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.8

Perimeter hesitation and clanked open looks from deep allowed defenders to pack the paint against his teammates. Despite robust point-of-attack defense, his offensive stagnation ultimately dragged down the lineup's efficiency.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.4%
USG% 18.3%
Net Rtg -56.8
+/- -32
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.5m
Offense +2.0
Hustle +2.0
Defense +2.6
Raw total +6.6
Avg player in 25.5m -14.4
Impact -7.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
12
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.3

Interior positioning and active screening created high-quality looks for the guards, though his insistence on popping for missed threes limited the overall ceiling. Held his ground against physical post matchups to keep the net impact hovering near neutral.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 46.6%
USG% 23.3%
Net Rtg -86.7
+/- -37
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.2m
Offense +7.3
Hustle +3.8
Defense +1.1
Raw total +12.2
Avg player in 22.2m -12.5
Impact -0.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 13
Opp FG% 81.2%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Matas Buzelis 21.3m
2
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-12.1

Shot selection was an absolute disaster, repeatedly forcing contested triples early in the shot clock that sparked opponent fast breaks. The complete evaporation of his usual scoring touch totally eclipsed some otherwise solid weak-side rim protection.

Shooting
FG 1/7 (14.3%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 14.3%
USG% 20.8%
Net Rtg -80.6
+/- -37
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.3m
Offense -6.5
Hustle +1.6
Defense +4.8
Raw total -0.1
Avg player in 21.3m -12.0
Impact -12.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 3
Dalen Terry 27.6m
8
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
-0.5

Relentless energy on 50/50 balls and active hands in the passing lanes defined a gritty two-way effort. Hitting timely catch-and-shoot looks from the corner punished defenders who tried to cheat off him, keeping his impact highly stable.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.8%
USG% 10.4%
Net Rtg -11.2
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.6m
Offense +5.8
Hustle +4.0
Defense +5.2
Raw total +15.0
Avg player in 27.6m -15.5
Impact -0.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
9
pts
10
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.8

Dominating the defensive glass was completely offset by a horrific shot diet of forced perimeter jumpers. Opponents blatantly ignored him on the arc, which bogged down the entire offensive flow and ruined his net rating.

Shooting
FG 3/12 (25.0%)
3PT 0/7 (0.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 32.7%
USG% 23.3%
Net Rtg -13.9
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.5m
Offense -1.2
Hustle +4.8
Defense +6.1
Raw total +9.7
Avg player in 27.5m -15.5
Impact -5.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 3
6
pts
6
reb
6
ast
Impact
-5.8

Excellent facilitation was heavily penalized by an inability to keep defenders honest from outside, allowing opponents to sag into the passing lanes. The resulting spacing issues and likely live-ball turnovers completely overshadowed his court vision.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.1%
USG% 9.3%
Net Rtg +1.6
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.7m
Offense +6.4
Hustle +0.4
Defense +2.4
Raw total +9.2
Avg player in 26.7m -15.0
Impact -5.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
10
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.6

Overcame a rough shooting night by relentlessly crashing the offensive glass to generate crucial second-chance opportunities. His high-motor closeouts on the perimeter salvaged possessions when the primary defensive shell broke down.

Shooting
FG 3/11 (27.3%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 42.1%
USG% 18.5%
Net Rtg -24.8
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.5m
Offense +6.0
Hustle +5.5
Defense +3.8
Raw total +15.3
Avg player in 22.5m -12.7
Impact +2.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
9
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+6.3

Maximized a brief rotation stint with decisive cuts and excellent spatial awareness in the dunker spot. A quick trigger on a key perimeter look showcased his growing confidence and instantly boosted the second unit's momentum.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 58.9%
USG% 27.6%
Net Rtg +4.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.0m
Offense +8.2
Hustle +2.0
Defense +2.3
Raw total +12.5
Avg player in 11.0m -6.2
Impact +6.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0