January 04, 2026
EXPLORE THE GAME
Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.
CHA
2P —
3P —
CHI
2P —
3P —
CHA
CHI
CHA
PLAYER PERFORMANCE
Chicago Bulls
Forcing the issue from beyond the arc torpedoed his efficiency and dragged his overall impact into negative territory. A steady diet of contested, early-clock triples resulted in wasted possessions that fueled opponent transition opportunities. Despite decent weak-side defensive rotations, his poor shot selection was too costly to overcome.
Clinical execution in the pick-and-pop game generated a massive +24.2 box impact. He systematically dismantled drop coverages by taking and making high-percentage looks from the elbows. This offensive masterclass, paired with disciplined defensive rebounding, drove a dominant +11.4 overall rating.
A sudden dip in finishing efficiency snapped his recent hot streak and nudged his net impact slightly into the red. While he generated excellent pace and logged a strong +3.6 hustle rating through loose-ball recoveries, he struggled to convert in traffic. Those missed floaters in the paint ultimately offset his otherwise steady floor generalship.
A severe regression in perimeter shooting completely derailed his overall impact, as he bricked multiple wide-open looks from the corner. Although he provided his usual point-of-attack defensive resistance, his offensive struggles allowed opponents to pack the paint. The inability to punish sagging defenders resulted in a brutal -9.8 net rating.
Remarkable interior efficiency and stout rim protection fueled an elite +10.2 impact rating in limited action. He anchored the second unit by consistently sealing off drivers and contesting shots without fouling. Capitalizing on every dump-off pass ensured his brief stint was overwhelmingly positive.
Elite defensive positioning and active hands salvaged what was otherwise a disastrous shooting night. He continuously misfired on clean catch-and-shoot looks, heavily suppressing his offensive value. However, his commitment to fighting through screens and securing long rebounds kept his overall impact above water.
Slicing through the defense with decisive straight-line drives powered a highly efficient offensive showing. His +5.5 defensive impact was equally crucial, as he effectively mirrored opposing ball-handlers to blow up perimeter actions. By avoiding costly turnovers and taking what the defense gave him, he secured a sturdy positive rating.
Smothering perimeter defense defined this performance, generating an exceptional +8.4 defensive rating in a short burst of minutes. He completely locked down his primary assignment, navigating screens with ease to disrupt offensive flow. This elite containment more than compensated for his minimal involvement on the offensive end.
An absolute nightmare of a shooting performance completely cratered his impact score in just 15 minutes of action. Bricking a barrage of wide-open looks from deep killed offensive momentum and allowed the defense to aggressively double-team his teammates. His marginal defensive contributions were entirely eclipsed by the sheer volume of empty offensive trips.
Blown assignments and late closeouts resulted in a damaging -2.2 defensive rating that ruined his overall score. Although he was efficient with his limited offensive touches, he consistently lost his man off the ball. A distinct lack of hustle plays further highlighted a low-energy shift that hurt the second unit.
Charlotte Hornets
A heavy offensive burden yielded a robust +18.6 box impact, even as his recent streak of hyper-efficient shooting cooled off. He generated immense gravity on the perimeter, forcing defensive rotations that opened up the floor for teammates. Solid off-ball awareness contributed to a +6.2 defensive mark, cementing a highly productive shift.
Dominant two-way execution fueled a massive +10.9 overall impact rating. He consistently punished mismatches in the half-court, converting high-quality looks at the rim to anchor the offense. A stellar +7.5 defensive score highlights how effectively he walled off the paint and contested drives.
Despite a tremendous +5.0 hustle rating generated by active hands and loose-ball recoveries, his overall impact slipped into the red. Poor shot selection led to a barrage of missed jumpers, dragging down his offensive efficiency. The sheer volume of empty possessions ultimately negated his high-energy defensive rotations.
Pushing the pace in transition allowed him to rack up a stellar +12.1 box impact while keeping the opposing defense scrambling. His +6.0 defensive rating stands out, driven by active passing-lane disruptions that sparked fast breaks. He struck a perfect balance between aggressive playmaking and disciplined shot selection.
Opportunistic scoring and stout interior positioning drove a solid positive return in his minutes. His +4.6 defensive rating reflects excellent verticality when challenging slashers at the rim. He maximized his role by avoiding forced shots and focusing on high-leverage hustle plays.
Offensive invisibility cratered his overall rating despite respectable hustle metrics. Opponents completely ignored him on the perimeter, which bogged down the team's half-court spacing and led to stalled possessions. His defensive effort couldn't salvage the massive structural disadvantage his lack of scoring gravity created.
A passive offensive approach resulted in a damaging -4.5 net rating, as he frequently passed up open catch-and-shoot opportunities. While his perimeter containment was adequate, his reluctance to attack closeouts allowed the defense to rest. The lack of two-way aggression ultimately dragged down the lineup's effectiveness.
Reduced offensive volume actually stabilized his overall impact, as he traded forced drives for methodical ball movement. A +5.4 defensive rating highlights his relentless point-of-attack pressure against opposing guards. By cutting out low-percentage looks, he delivered a highly efficient, positive-impact stint.
Failing to register a single hustle play left him entirely dependent on offensive production that never materialized. Clanking several rushed jumpers early in the shot clock actively hurt the team's momentum. The combination of empty offensive trips and zero physical presence on the glass led to a steep -7.8 impact score.
