Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
BOS lead CHI lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
CHI 2P — 3P —
BOS 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 190 attempts

CHI CHI Shot-making Δ

Vučević 6/14 +0.9
Dosunmu 6/13 +0.1
Buzelis 9/12 +8.2
Huerter 4/9 -2.3
Jones 4/7 +0.3
White Hard 2/7 -1.9
Okoro Hard 1/7 -4.5
Carter Hard 2/6 -0.1
Phillips Hard 2/5 +0.4
Williams Hard 1/4 -1.7

BOS BOS Shot-making Δ

Brown Hard 6/24 -8.6
Pritchard Hard 8/17 +4.3
Simons Hard 9/16 +10.0
White Hard 3/15 -7.2
Queta Open 6/9 +0.5
Hauser Hard 3/8 +1.3
González Hard 1/5 -2.5
Garza Open 3/4 +1.2
Walsh 2/4 +0.7
Scheierman Hard 1/2 +0.8
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
CHI
BOS
38/86 Field Goals 42/104
44.2% Field Goal % 40.4%
16/46 3-Pointers 20/52
34.8% 3-Point % 38.5%
9/10 Free Throws 11/13
90.0% Free Throw % 84.6%
55.9% True Shooting % 52.4%
49 Total Rebounds 64
6 Offensive 20
39 Defensive 34
25 Assists 22
1.92 Assist/TO Ratio 2.75
11 Turnovers 7
2 Steals 7
4 Blocks 4
13 Fouls 11
36 Points in Paint 34
14 Fast Break Pts 15
8 Points off TOs 19
12 Second Chance Pts 26
37 Bench Points 48
3 Largest Lead 23
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Neemias Queta
13 PTS · 13 REB · 1 AST · 24.6 MIN
+21.33
2
Matas Buzelis
26 PTS · 3 REB · 2 AST · 31.0 MIN
+20.71
3
Payton Pritchard
21 PTS · 6 REB · 5 AST · 31.2 MIN
+19.52
4
Anfernee Simons
27 PTS · 3 REB · 3 AST · 27.2 MIN
+18.45
5
Nikola Vučević
15 PTS · 15 REB · 7 AST · 36.4 MIN
+17.09
6
Luka Garza
8 PTS · 4 REB · 0 AST · 23.4 MIN
+15.41
7
Derrick White
10 PTS · 6 REB · 7 AST · 37.1 MIN
+13.1
8
Ayo Dosunmu
15 PTS · 3 REB · 5 AST · 27.8 MIN
+11.95
9
Tre Jones
10 PTS · 5 REB · 4 AST · 23.4 MIN
+9.32
10
Julian Phillips
6 PTS · 2 REB · 0 AST · 13.2 MIN
+7.33
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:16 BOS shot clock Team TURNOVER 101–115
Q4 0:37 J. Walsh REBOUND (Off:1 Def:4) 101–115
Q4 0:41 D. White BLOCK (1 BLK) 101–115
Q4 0:41 MISS P. Williams driving Layup - blocked 101–115
Q4 0:55 A. Simons 25' 3PT (27 PTS) (P. Pritchard 5 AST) 101–115
Q4 1:10 D. Terry 25' 3PT (3 PTS) (J. Carter 1 AST) 101–112
Q4 1:28 N. Queta Free Throw 1 of 1 (13 PTS) 98–112
Q4 1:28 A. Dosunmu shooting personal FOUL (2 PF) (Queta 1 FT) 98–111
Q4 1:28 N. Queta driving finger roll Layup (12 PTS) (J. Brown 4 AST) 98–111
Q4 1:41 N. Queta REBOUND (Off:6 Def:7) 98–109
Q4 1:46 MISS I. Okoro 3PT 98–109
Q4 1:55 A. Dosunmu REBOUND (Off:0 Def:3) 98–109
Q4 1:58 MISS D. White 29' 3PT 98–109
Q4 2:16 J. Brown REBOUND (Off:3 Def:5) 98–109
Q4 2:18 MISS A. Dosunmu 25' 3PT 98–109

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

BOS Boston Celtics
S Derrick White 37.0m
10
pts
6
reb
7
ast
Impact
+8.0

Elite defensive anticipation and relentless hustle plays completely salvaged a night where his jumper was entirely broken. Despite throwing up brick after brick from the perimeter, his ability to blow up pick-and-rolls and generate deflections kept his overall impact in the green. He proved he can dictate a game's outcome without scoring the basketball.

Shooting
FG 3/15 (20.0%)
3PT 1/10 (10.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 30.6%
USG% 17.0%
Net Rtg -3.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.0m
Scoring +1.8
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +5.7
Defense +6.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 0
S Jaylen Brown 34.6m
14
pts
8
reb
4
ast
Impact
-4.6

An atrocious display of shot selection and forced isolation attempts completely torpedoed Boston's offensive efficiency. Clanking mid-range pull-ups and forcing drives into heavy traffic negated any minor positive contributions he made on the glass. This was a severe regression from his recent dominant scoring tear, dragging the entire starting unit down with him.

Shooting
FG 6/24 (25.0%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 28.1%
USG% 31.1%
Net Rtg +15.5
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.6m
Scoring +1.9
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +8.2
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -7.8
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
21
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
+15.5

Aggressive perimeter shot-hunting stretched the opposing defense past its breaking point. Beyond the deep range, he provided surprisingly stout point-of-attack defense against bigger guards, fighting over screens to disrupt the offensive flow. His constant motion off the ball made him a nightmare to track in transition.

Shooting
FG 8/17 (47.1%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 60.2%
USG% 21.8%
Net Rtg +16.1
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.2m
Scoring +15.0
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +6.1
Hustle +1.8
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Neemias Queta 24.6m
13
pts
13
reb
1
ast
Impact
+19.8

Utter dominance in the painted area fueled a massive positive impact, as he bullied his matchups for high-percentage finishes. His rim protection and relentless activity on the offensive glass created a massive possession advantage for Boston. He continues to prove he can anchor the interior with brutal efficiency.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.9%
USG% 16.1%
Net Rtg +17.6
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.6m
Scoring +10.9
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +16.5
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
S Sam Hauser 20.6m
9
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.3

Active hands in passing lanes and excellent floor spacing kept his peripheral metrics looking strong. However, missing a handful of clean catch-and-shoot looks he typically buries kept his overall net rating slightly in the red. He executed his role properly but lacked the final layer of shot-making execution.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 56.3%
USG% 13.8%
Net Rtg +5.8
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.6m
Scoring +5.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.8
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
27
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+18.8

A spectacular barrage of contested three-pointers completely broke the opponent's defensive scheme. He hunted his shot with supreme confidence, using subtle hesitations to create massive separation on the perimeter. This lethal outside gravity opened up driving lanes for the rest of the roster all night long.

Shooting
FG 9/16 (56.2%)
3PT 8/14 (57.1%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 80.0%
USG% 31.3%
Net Rtg +18.9
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.2m
Scoring +21.2
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +8.3
Hustle +3.8
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -4.6
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
Luka Garza 23.4m
8
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
+6.6

Capitalizing on every interior touch allowed him to maximize his value in a condensed role. He supplemented his flawless finishing with excellent verticality at the rim, deterring drives and anchoring the second-unit defense. It was a clinic in playing within a system and dominating the physical margins.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 82.0%
USG% 8.6%
Net Rtg +9.1
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.4m
Scoring +7.2
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +5.1
Defense +3.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 0
Jordan Walsh 18.4m
5
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.8

Hesitancy to attack closeouts limited his offensive utility, rendering him mostly a spectator on that end of the floor. While his defensive length bothered opposing wings, he struggled to navigate off-ball screens, leading to a slightly negative overall stint. He needs to assert himself more to warrant heavier rotation minutes.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 9.5%
Net Rtg +22.0
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.4m
Scoring +3.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +3.4
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.8

Crashing the glass with reckless abandon allowed him to post a positive impact despite a very rough shooting performance. He missed several wide-open perimeter looks but made up for it by extending possessions and keeping the ball moving. His raw energy compensated for a lack of offensive polish.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 42.5%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg +11.9
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.3m
Scoring +1.9
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +8.9
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.9

A failure to contain dribble penetration on the perimeter dragged down his brief appearance. He managed to knock down a spot-up look, but his slow lateral footwork made him an easy target in isolation sets. The defensive bleeding forced the coaching staff to look elsewhere.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 8.0%
Net Rtg +18.1
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.7m
Scoring +2.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
CHI Chicago Bulls
15
pts
15
reb
7
ast
Impact
+14.9

Surprisingly stout interior positioning anchored a highly positive defensive rating for the veteran big man. While his finishing around the rim was somewhat erratic, stepping out to stretch the floor from deep kept the offensive spacing intact. His ability to dictate the glass limited second-chance opportunities for the opponent.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 53.6%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -10.4
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.4m
Scoring +9.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +4.4
Hustle +12.3
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Matas Buzelis 31.0m
26
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+15.7

Elite shot selection and off-ball movement fueled a massive offensive spike well above his recent baseline. He paired this scoring efficiency with tremendous energy on the margins, generating immense value through hustle plays alone. The rookie's two-way activity dictated the tempo whenever he was on the floor.

Shooting
FG 9/12 (75.0%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 88.8%
USG% 22.9%
Net Rtg -13.8
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.0m
Scoring +22.9
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +5.5
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -4.7
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Isaac Okoro 24.9m
5
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.1

An abysmal perimeter shooting display completely derailed his overall impact. Despite offering solid point-of-attack resistance and positive hustle plays, bricking nearly every look from deep killed Chicago's spacing. He lacked his usual offensive rhythm, falling well short of his recent efficient scoring stretch.

Shooting
FG 1/7 (14.3%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 31.7%
USG% 15.8%
Net Rtg -9.5
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.9m
Scoring +0.1
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
S Tre Jones 23.4m
10
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
+4.2

Passive offensive stretches limited his overall influence despite maintaining his streak of highly efficient shooting. He managed the game well enough, but a lack of disruptive defensive plays or high-leverage hustle moments left his net rating slightly in the red. The offense needed him to hunt his own shot more aggressively.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.5%
USG% 18.0%
Net Rtg -10.4
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.4m
Scoring +7.6
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +6.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Kevin Huerter 19.6m
8
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.0

A complete inability to find the range from beyond the arc neutralized his primary value to the offense. Even though his defensive rotations were surprisingly crisp, the lack of perimeter gravity bogged down half-court sets. He simply couldn't replicate the efficient scoring punch he had been providing over the last week.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 44.4%
USG% 23.8%
Net Rtg -30.8
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.6m
Scoring +4.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Ayo Dosunmu 27.8m
15
pts
3
reb
5
ast
Impact
+4.3

Transition pushes and timely perimeter makes kept his offensive metrics looking healthy. However, his net impact hovered near neutral due to occasional defensive miscommunications and giving up driving lanes. He provided a steadying presence in the backcourt without completely tilting the game in either direction.

Shooting
FG 6/13 (46.2%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 57.7%
USG% 21.0%
Net Rtg -7.3
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.8m
Scoring +10.4
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
Coby White 25.4m
5
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
-18.8

Forced looks and a broken perimeter stroke resulted in a disastrous overall rating. Without his usual scoring rhythm to fall back on, his defensive lapses at the point of attack became glaringly obvious. The offense consistently stalled out during his shifts as he struggled to create separation.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 35.7%
USG% 19.6%
Net Rtg -10.0
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.4m
Scoring +1.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +1.8
Defense -3.7
Turnovers -9.5
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
6
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.3

High-energy closeouts and disciplined weak-side rotations drove a surprisingly strong defensive rating in limited action. He maximized his offensive touches by strictly taking high-value perimeter looks, punishing the defense for leaving him open. It was a perfect sparkplug performance that capitalized on every second of playing time.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -32.1
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.2m
Scoring +3.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +2.5
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Jevon Carter 11.8m
6
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.2

Settling for contested perimeter jumpers prevented him from establishing any real offensive rhythm. He applied his trademark ball pressure at the top of the key, but it wasn't enough to offset the empty possessions on the other end. The second unit struggled to find flow while he was initiating the offense.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -4.3
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.8m
Scoring +2.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-11.3

A completely invisible offensive stint tanked his value during his limited minutes on the floor. He failed to establish any physical presence in the paint, allowing opponents to exploit his defensive rotations. The lack of aggression was a sharp departure from his recent efficient outings.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 3.8%
Net Rtg -22.3
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.7m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.2

His ongoing shooting slump continued to plague his floor spacing, rendering him an offensive liability. While he offered mild resistance on the wing, his hesitancy to attack closeouts allowed the defense to completely ignore him. The coaching staff had to pull him early due to his inability to generate any positive momentum.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg -29.5
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.1m
Scoring -0.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.2

A brief cameo yielded a perfectly neutral impact, highlighted only by a single capitalized spot-up opportunity. He simply wasn't on the floor long enough to accumulate any meaningful defensive or hustle metrics. The coaching staff used him strictly as a momentary placeholder to buy rest for the primary rotation.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 9.1%
Net Rtg -10.0
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.9m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0