BKN

2025-26 Season

TERANCE MANN

Brooklyn Nets | Guard-Forward | 6-6
Terance Mann
7.2 PPG
3.2 RPG
3.0 APG
24.3 MPG
-3.2 Impact

Mann produces at an below average rate for a 24-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-3.2
Scoring +4.2
Points 7.2 PPG × +1.00 = +7.2
Missed 2PT 1.6/g × -0.78 = -1.3
Missed 3PT 1.6/g × -0.87 = -1.4
Missed FT 0.3/g × -1.00 = -0.3
Creation +2.5
Assists 3.0/g × +0.50 = +1.5
Off. Rebounds 0.8/g × +1.26 = +1.0
Turnovers -2.1
Turnovers 1.1/g × -1.95 = -2.1
Defense +0.6
Steals 0.7/g × +2.30 = +1.6
Blocks 0.2/g × +0.90 = +0.2
Def. Rebounds 2.4/g × +0.30 = +0.7
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.5
Contested Shots 2.7/g × +0.20 = +0.5
Deflections 1.9/g × +0.65 = +1.2
Loose Balls 0.3/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.4/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.2/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.5
Raw Impact +7.7
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.9
Net Impact
-3.2
22th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 236 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 32th
7.2 PPG
Efficiency 52th
55.0% TS
Playmaking 57th
3.0 APG
Rebounding 56th
3.2 RPG
Rim Protection 10th
0.07/min
Hustle 56th
0.11/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 65th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Terance Mann’s first twenty games were defined by a maddening offensive passivity that routinely suffocated his team's spacing. He occasionally flashed his true ceiling when he actually looked for his shot, erupting for 21 points and a massive +10.8 impact on 10/27 vs HOU thanks to elite shot selection and relentless off-ball movement. Far too often, however, he simply vanished from the floor. Look no further than 11/23 vs TOR, where a total lack of scoring gravity yielded just 3 points and a brutal -9.4 impact because defenders felt entirely comfortable cheating off him to clog the paint. Even when he managed to put the ball in the basket, hidden costs often ruined his value. On 11/28 vs PHI, his 14 points on efficient cutting were completely erased by a highly problematic defensive performance, dragging his impact score down to a dismal -6.5. While his hustle metrics occasionally popped, Mann's hesitation to attack closeouts ultimately turned him into a glaring half-court liability.

Terance Mann spent this stretch trapped in a brutal slump defined by extreme offensive passivity and costly defensive lapses. Even when he found the basket during the 01/02 vs WAS matchup, his 14 points were completely undermined by a -3.6 impact score stemming from significant defensive mistakes and foul trouble. His floor-spacing value entirely evaporated during the 12/23 vs PHI contest. Clanked perimeter looks and utter offensive invisibility dragged his impact down to a basement-level -12.4 that night. He briefly flipped the script on 01/09 vs LAC. Despite scoring just 8 points in that outing, relentless perimeter harassment and elite loose-ball recovery drove a stellar +6.8 impact score. Unfortunately, those hustle plays were rare exceptions in a rotation stint plagued by crippling hesitation, as his refusal to shoot routinely allowed defenders to freely roam and double-team other ball handlers.

Extreme offensive passivity and maddening inconsistency defined this brutal midseason slump for Terance Mann. He routinely vanished from the floor, hitting rock bottom during an empty start on 02/11 vs IND. Clunky finishing and complete offensive invisibility generated a disastrous -13.8 impact score. He finally flipped the script off the bench on 02/24 vs DAL. By relentlessly attacking closeouts, Mann poured in 17 points and earned a +5.6 impact score to give the second unit a massive punch. Yet, his most valuable performance required almost no shooting at all. On 03/27 vs LAL, he managed just 5 points but still posted a massive +10.2 impact mark. Active hands in the passing lanes and stellar rotational defense created immense value, keeping his team afloat without demanding the basketball.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Inconsistent. Mann has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~4 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 54% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Mann locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: -1.8, second-half: -4.5. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 4 games. Longest cold streak: 7 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 70 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

C. McCollum 81.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.22
PTS 18
T. Herro 63.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 5
I. Quickley 57.0 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 5
T. Maxey 56.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 10
P. Pritchard 44.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
J. Harden 41.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
N. Powell 41.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Simons 41.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Brunson 41.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
J. McCain 40.2 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

T. Maxey 85.6 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 12
C. McCollum 69.6 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 12
P. Pritchard 54.3 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.06
PTS 3
T. Herro 51.4 poss
FG% 53.8%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 16
J. Murray 49.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 14
N. Powell 41.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.22
PTS 9
A. Simons 41.0 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 9
J. Harden 40.7 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.29
PTS 12
B. Ingram 36.7 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 9
D. DiVincenzo 35.3 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.42
PTS 15

SEASON STATS

63
Games
7.2
PPG
3.2
RPG
3.0
APG
0.7
SPG
0.2
BPG
45.7
FG%
36.4
3P%
78.8
FT%
24.3
MPG

GAME LOG

63 games played