GAME ANALYSIS

GET THIS IN YOUR INBOX

Every breakdown for your team — free, the morning after the game.

Follow your team — free

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

MIN Minnesota Timberwolves
S Jaden McDaniels 40.7m
14
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.0

Jaden McDaniels struggled to find his offensive rhythm, shooting just 40% from the floor to finish below his 17.4 scoring average. Despite the clunky shooting, he maintained a high motor with 11 shot contests and 2 loose-ball recoveries, driving a +4.7 Hustle credit. However, his complete lack of playmaking (0 assists, avg 2.2) and zero defensive counting stats limited his overall effectiveness.

Shooting
FG 6/15 (40.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.1%
USG% 17.0%
Net Rtg -4.7
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.7m
Scoring +7.3
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +6.7
Defense -5.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Anthony Edwards 40.1m
36
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+16.1

Anthony Edwards unleashed a devastating scoring barrage, pouring in 36 points (well above his 19.9 average) on a scorching 59% from the field. His elite shot-making, including 3-of-5 from deep, powered a massive +24.0 Offense credit despite 4 turnovers. He operated as an unstoppable primary weapon, completely overwhelming the defense with his aggressive downhill attacks.

Shooting
FG 13/22 (59.1%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 7/8 (87.5%)
Advanced
TS% 70.5%
USG% 30.6%
Net Rtg +2.9
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.1m
Scoring +29.2
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +7.5
Hustle +2.8
Defense -5.4
Turnovers -9.5
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S Julius Randle 37.6m
12
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
-7.6

Sloppy ball-handling derailed Julius Randle's night, as his 6 turnovers (nearly double his 3.1 average) severely undercut his offensive value. While he was active on the glass with 8 rebounds (avg 6.6), his scoring volume plummeted to just 12 points on 12 shots. The constant giveaways prevented him from establishing any sustained rhythm, resulting in a muted +1.5 Offense credit.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 19.4%
Net Rtg +16.5
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.6m
Scoring +6.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +9.2
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -14.2
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 6
S Rudy Gobert 30.3m
11
pts
13
reb
4
ast
Impact
+16.6

Rudy Gobert anchored the interior with his usual brute force, pulling down 13 rebounds (avg 10.6) and contesting 8 shots. He was surprisingly effective as a hub, dishing out 4 assists (avg 2.4) and freeing up teammates with 5 screen assists to help generate a stellar +19.5 Offense credit. His highly efficient 4-of-7 shooting further maximized his low-volume scoring role.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.8%
USG% 10.4%
Net Rtg -11.3
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.3m
Scoring +7.8
Creation +2.7
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +15.5
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
S Ayo Dosunmu 30.3m
10
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-3.6

A frigid 3-of-12 shooting performance severely limited Ayo Dosunmu's offensive output, holding him to just 10 points (avg 16.9). However, he refused to be a liability, pivoting his energy toward the defensive end to rack up 8 contests, 2 steals (avg 1.1), and 2 loose-ball recoveries. His relentless activity salvaged his night, earning him a +4.2 Defense credit despite the broken jumper.

Shooting
FG 3/12 (25.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -4.5
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.3m
Scoring +3.4
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +1.5
Defense +3.5
Turnovers -3.5
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
Naz Reid 30.6m
15
pts
9
reb
4
ast
Impact
+8.7

Naz Reid thrived as a versatile frontcourt hub, pairing 15 efficient points (50% FG) with a robust 9 rebounds (avg 6.9). His playmaking was a major bright spot, as he dished out 4 assists (avg 2.0) and added 3 screen assists to drive a +14.1 Offense credit. Even with his three-point shot failing to fall (0-of-4), his interior presence and active hands (4 deflections) made him highly effective.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.3%
USG% 16.5%
Net Rtg +16.8
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.6m
Scoring +10.3
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +10.5
Defense -2.9
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
8
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-9.2

Terrence Shannon Jr. endured a miserable shooting night, clanking his way to 8 points on 25% from the floor, which dragged his Offense credit down to -1.9. He managed to offset some of the damage through sheer effort, drawing a charge and logging 6 contests to fuel a strong +5.2 Hustle credit. Still, his inability to finish around the rim severely capped his overall impact.

Shooting
FG 3/12 (25.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 27.5%
Net Rtg +27.0
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.8m
Scoring +1.0
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Mike Conley 10.7m
8
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-3.4

Mike Conley made the absolute most of his brief 11-minute cameo, executing with flawless precision to hit all of his field goal and free throw attempts. His pair of triples fueled an 8-point burst (above his 5.6 average) and a +7.5 Offense credit. While he didn't grab a single rebound, his veteran poise and perfect shooting provided a sharp offensive spark.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 138.9%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg +35.1
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.7m
Scoring +8.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
SAS San Antonio Spurs
S De'Aaron Fox 36.9m
24
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+14.1

De'Aaron Fox overcame a brutal 8-of-23 shooting night by turning into an absolute menace on the defensive end. He racked up 9 deflections and 3 steals (avg 1.4), fueling a massive +7.3 Defense credit and +7.0 Hustle credit. While his playmaking dipped to 3 assists (avg 5.7), his relentless aggression attacking the rim yielded 10 free throw attempts to salvage his offensive value (+10.4 Offense).

Shooting
FG 8/23 (34.8%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 7/10 (70.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.8%
USG% 30.5%
Net Rtg -14.7
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.9m
Scoring +11.6
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +1.2
Defense +6.5
Turnovers -2.4
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 1
S Stephon Castle 36.6m
20
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
+11.2

Stephon Castle leaned heavily into his scoring instincts, dropping 20 points to power a robust +16.1 Offense credit. Though his playmaking took a backseat with just 4 assists (below his 7.5 average), he supplemented his offensive punch with high-energy defense, logging 10 contests and 3 deflections. His ability to toggle between primary facilitator and aggressive scorer keeps his offensive profile highly dynamic.

Shooting
FG 8/17 (47.1%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 54.6%
USG% 20.9%
Net Rtg +6.3
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.6m
Scoring +13.1
Creation +2.6
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +6.7
Defense -1.8
Turnovers -3.1
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
S Devin Vassell 33.4m
14
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
+4.8

Devin Vassell delivered a highly efficient scoring punch, converting 60% of his looks to drive a +10.7 Offense credit. While his rebounding plummeted to just 1 board (avg 5.3), he compensated with disruptive perimeter defense, snatching 2 steals (avg 1.3) and logging 2 deflections. His shot-making was crisp, though his overall floor game lacked its usual rebounding presence.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 70.0%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg +2.3
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.4m
Scoring +10.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +3.2
Turnovers -3.1
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
8
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+0.6

A frigid shooting night (0-of-5 from deep) suppressed Julian Champagnie's scoring output, but he found other ways to contribute. His defensive activity (+5.0 Defense credit) and active hands (2 steals, above his 1.0 average) kept him engaged despite the 25% field goal mark. His playmaking also ticked up with 3 assists (avg 1.8), showing an ability to pivot when his jumper isn't falling.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.0%
USG% 13.5%
Net Rtg -11.3
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.7m
Scoring +3.5
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +2.5
Defense +3.2
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.7

In a startlingly brief 12-minute appearance, Victor Wembanyama was a complete non-factor offensively, managing just 4 points (a massive drop from his 24.8 average). The lack of volume dragged his Offense credit down to -0.3, and his usually dominant rim protection vanished entirely with zero blocks (avg 3.9). He simply couldn't establish any rhythm before exiting, leaving a massive void in the middle.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 40.0%
USG% 24.1%
Net Rtg +0.1
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.5m
Scoring +1.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +2.2
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -2.2
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Dylan Harper 27.1m
24
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
+20.2

Dylan Harper delivered a masterclass in hyper-efficient scoring, pouring in 24 points on just 11 shot attempts (73% FG) to generate a massive +22.3 Offense credit. He was equally disruptive on the other end, grabbing 3 steals (avg 1.1) and logging 4 deflections to anchor a +6.9 Defense mark. His aggressive rebounding (7 boards, avg 4.1) further cemented a dominant two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 8/11 (72.7%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 7/7 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 85.2%
USG% 23.2%
Net Rtg -26.5
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.1m
Scoring +21.6
Creation +3.1
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +4.0
Defense +4.0
Turnovers -4.7
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 2
Luke Kornet 26.2m
7
pts
9
reb
1
ast
Impact
+6.1

Luke Kornet's value was entirely driven by his relentless dirty work in the paint, highlighted by 14 shot contests and 2 blocks (avg 0.6) that fueled a +5.8 Defense credit. He also punished the glass with 9 rebounds (avg 5.3) and freed up shooters with 6 screen assists. His highly efficient 3-of-4 shooting ensured his low-volume scoring still yielded a strong +12.3 Offense credit.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 71.7%
USG% 9.4%
Net Rtg -2.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.2m
Scoring +5.9
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +11.4
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 1
4
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.4

A lack of aggression and sloppy decision-making defined Keldon Johnson's quiet 16-minute shift. He attempted just 4 shots, finishing with 4 points (well below his 10.5 average), and his 3 turnovers (avg 1.1) dragged his Offense credit down to -2.1. He failed to generate his usual downhill momentum, rendering him largely invisible on the offensive end.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 45.0%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg -19.2
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.6m
Scoring +1.9
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +3.8
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -5.9
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-18.6

Carter Bryant struggled to find any positive rhythm during his 12 minutes, sinking his value with 3 turnovers (well above his 0.9 average). His inability to protect the ball resulted in a -4.1 Offense credit, and he was virtually invisible elsewhere, grabbing just 1 rebound. It was a completely empty shift that actively hurt the second unit's flow.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 16.1%
Net Rtg -7.1
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.0m
Scoring +1.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -6.6
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.2

Harrison Barnes barely registered during a fleeting 9-minute cameo, attempting just two shots and finishing with 2 points. He provided virtually no peripheral stats, grabbing a single rebound and failing to record an assist or defensive counting stat. His minimal involvement left him as a complete non-factor on both ends of the floor.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 9.1%
Net Rtg -29.4
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.1m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0