Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
MIN lead ATL lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
ATL 2P — 3P —
MIN 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 191 attempts

ATL ATL Shot-making Δ

McCollum 12/25 +2.4
Alexander-Walker 9/19 +1.6
Kispert 4/12 -4.8
Okongwu 4/9 -0.3
Risacher Hard 1/9 -7.9
Gueye Open 4/8 -1.6
Vincent Hard 1/6 -4.5
Landale Open 4/5 +2.9
Newell 1/5 -4.2
Hield Hard 0/1 -1.1

MIN MIN Shot-making Δ

Edwards 11/21 +2.7
Randle 8/14 +3.4
Dosunmu 9/13 +4.3
McDaniels 7/11 +4.8
DiVincenzo Hard 4/10 -1.0
Reid Hard 3/8 -2.3
Hyland Hard 5/7 +5.9
Gobert Open 7/7 +4.2
Clark Hard 1/1 +1.9
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
ATL
MIN
40/99 Field Goals 55/92
40.4% Field Goal % 59.8%
14/45 3-Pointers 16/42
31.1% 3-Point % 38.1%
22/28 Free Throws 12/21
78.6% Free Throw % 57.1%
52.1% True Shooting % 68.2%
61 Total Rebounds 51
17 Offensive 7
30 Defensive 34
20 Assists 36
1.05 Assist/TO Ratio 2.40
18 Turnovers 15
12 Steals 10
1 Blocks 9
19 Fouls 19
42 Points in Paint 70
26 Fast Break Pts 25
24 Points off TOs 26
19 Second Chance Pts 8
36 Bench Points 44
1 Largest Lead 31
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
CJ McCollum
38 PTS · 1 REB · 2 AST · 32.8 MIN
+29.35
2
Anthony Edwards
30 PTS · 6 REB · 6 AST · 38.1 MIN
+22.71
3
Jaden McDaniels
18 PTS · 5 REB · 3 AST · 33.9 MIN
+21.14
4
Julius Randle
18 PTS · 12 REB · 10 AST · 38.6 MIN
+19.0
5
Ayo Dosunmu
21 PTS · 1 REB · 3 AST · 29.8 MIN
+17.73
6
Jock Landale
12 PTS · 6 REB · 0 AST · 18.5 MIN
+13.17
7
Mouhamed Gueye
10 PTS · 7 REB · 0 AST · 19.5 MIN
+12.94
8
Nickeil Alexander-Walker
23 PTS · 12 REB · 5 AST · 35.3 MIN
+11.89
9
Bones Hyland
13 PTS · 1 REB · 5 AST · 14.9 MIN
+11.35
10
Rudy Gobert
18 PTS · 6 REB · 1 AST · 32.5 MIN
+11.23
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:00 TEAM offensive REBOUND 116–138
Q4 0:00 MISS N. Alexander-Walker 30' pullup 3PT 116–138
Q4 0:20 N. Alexander-Walker STEAL (2 STL) 116–138
Q4 0:20 J. Randle lost ball TURNOVER (4 TO) 116–138
Q4 0:23 J. Randle REBOUND (Off:2 Def:10) 116–138
Q4 0:27 MISS J. McDaniels 31' pullup 3PT 116–138
Q4 0:49 J. Randle REBOUND (Off:1 Def:10) 116–138
Q4 0:51 MISS O. Okongwu Free Throw 2 of 2 116–138
Q4 0:51 O. Okongwu Free Throw 1 of 2 (14 PTS) 116–138
Q4 0:51 J. McDaniels personal FOUL (2 PF) (Okongwu 2 FT) 115–138
Q4 1:05 C. Kispert REBOUND (Off:2 Def:5) 115–138
Q4 1:07 MISS J. Randle cutting Layup 115–138
Q4 1:33 N. Alexander-Walker lost ball out-of-bounds TURNOVER (6 TO) 115–138
Q4 1:41 J. McDaniels 26' 3PT running (18 PTS) (D. DiVincenzo 6 AST) 115–138
Q4 1:43 J. Randle REBOUND (Off:1 Def:9) 115–135

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

MIN Minnesota Timberwolves
S Julius Randle 38.6m
18
pts
12
reb
10
ast
Impact
+13.2

Operating as the central offensive hub, his elite playmaking and physical rebounding generated a massive +12.8 box impact. He consistently collapsed the defense to create high-quality looks for shooters, while maintaining excellent defensive positioning on the other end.

Shooting
FG 8/14 (57.1%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 64.3%
USG% 18.4%
Net Rtg +26.6
+/- +25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.6m
Scoring +13.4
Creation +3.0
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +11.4
Defense +3.1
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 43.8%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 4
S Anthony Edwards 38.1m
30
pts
6
reb
6
ast
Impact
+18.1

Breaking out of a recent slump, he relentlessly attacked the paint and hunted his shot to generate a massive +18.6 box impact. His aggressive downhill drives forced the defense into constant rotation, while his engaged perimeter defense rounded out a dominant showing.

Shooting
FG 11/21 (52.4%)
3PT 4/11 (36.4%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.7%
USG% 29.0%
Net Rtg +25.6
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.1m
Scoring +21.8
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +7.0
Hustle +5.7
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -8.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 4
S Jaden McDaniels 33.9m
18
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+11.2

Suffocating point-of-attack defense (+11.3) set the tone for a brilliant two-way masterclass. He paired elite hustle metrics with surgical shot selection, punishing defensive rotations by knocking down highly efficient looks from the perimeter.

Shooting
FG 7/11 (63.6%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 70.5%
USG% 14.1%
Net Rtg +27.8
+/- +25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.9m
Scoring +14.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +3.4
Defense +2.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 29.4%
STL 1
BLK 4
TO 0
S Rudy Gobert 32.5m
18
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.1

Perfect execution as a roll man allowed him to convert every single field goal attempt he took. His sheer size and relentless rim-running (+5.6 hustle) forced the defense to collapse inward, stabilizing the interior on both ends of the floor.

Shooting
FG 7/7 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 4/9 (44.4%)
Advanced
TS% 82.1%
USG% 16.9%
Net Rtg +16.7
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.5m
Scoring +15.5
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +5.7
Defense -5.8
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 52.9%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
10
pts
4
reb
6
ast
Impact
-2.8

Errant perimeter shooting suppressed his offensive ceiling and limited his overall impact. However, he salvaged his minutes by playing absolute pest defense (+7.7) and generating crucial extra possessions through sheer hustle.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 2/8 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +17.9
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.9m
Scoring +5.4
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +1.2
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 85.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
Ayo Dosunmu 29.8m
21
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
+9.1

Slicing through the defense with surgical precision, his elite shot selection drove a stellar +17.2 box impact. He consistently beat his primary defender off the dribble, creating high-percentage looks at the rim without forcing the issue.

Shooting
FG 9/13 (69.2%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 78.1%
USG% 18.7%
Net Rtg +13.2
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.8m
Scoring +17.8
Creation +2.4
Shot Making +4.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense -2.1
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 31.2%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
Naz Reid 21.4m
7
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
-5.1

A frigid night from beyond the arc completely neutralized his value as a floor-spacing big. Even though his defensive rotations were crisp (+6.5), clanking every single look from deep allowed the opposing frontcourt to pack the paint.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 39.4%
USG% 19.6%
Net Rtg +14.4
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.4m
Scoring +2.5
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +1.8
Defense +3.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 1
Bones Hyland 14.9m
13
pts
1
reb
5
ast
Impact
+0.1

Providing an immediate sparkplug effect, he torched the nets with highly efficient perimeter shot-making in limited minutes. His quick-trigger confidence from deep broke down the opposing second unit's defensive shell and swung the momentum.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 92.9%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg +1.1
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.9m
Scoring +11.5
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +3.7
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
3
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.5

Made the most of a very brief cameo by knocking down his only perimeter look. He stayed within the flow of the offense and provided a slight positive bump during his five minutes of action.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 8.3%
Net Rtg +41.7
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.9m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
ATL Atlanta Hawks
23
pts
12
reb
5
ast
Impact
+6.4

High-volume production masked a surprisingly negative overall footprint during his heavy minutes. While he hunted his shot effectively and crashed the glass hard, the team consistently lost his shifts, suggesting his offensive rhythm came at the expense of overall lineup cohesion.

Shooting
FG 9/19 (47.4%)
3PT 4/9 (44.4%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.2%
USG% 26.6%
Net Rtg -19.5
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.2m
Scoring +15.7
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +6.3
Hustle +11.4
Defense -1.8
Turnovers -14.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 64.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 6
S Onyeka Okongwu 33.2m
14
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-2.7

Sinking a pair of unexpected threes boosted his individual box metrics, but his overall footprint remained surprisingly negative. The underlying data suggests he struggled heavily in his specific frontcourt matchups, bleeding points during his shifts despite decent hustle numbers.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 4/7 (57.1%)
Advanced
TS% 57.9%
USG% 15.6%
Net Rtg -34.7
+/- -27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.2m
Scoring +8.4
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +2.5
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S CJ McCollum 32.9m
38
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
+28.7

An absolute flamethrower from beyond the arc, his aggressive shot-making carried the offensive load and generated a massive +20.6 box impact. Surprisingly, he paired this scoring outburst with incredibly stout perimeter defense (+9.4), resulting in a dominant two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 12/25 (48.0%)
3PT 5/9 (55.6%)
FT 9/11 (81.8%)
Advanced
TS% 63.7%
USG% 35.5%
Net Rtg -34.2
+/- -25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.9m
Scoring +27.4
Creation +2.9
Shot Making +8.1
Hustle +0.3
Defense +9.2
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 61.5%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 3
S Asa Newell 24.8m
2
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-15.3

Offensive invisibility severely limited his overall effectiveness during his heavy rotation minutes. He failed to establish any rhythm or gravity, and his inability to convert on limited looks dragged down the lineup's efficiency despite adequate hustle.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 20.0%
USG% 10.9%
Net Rtg -29.8
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.8m
Scoring -1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +4.1
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -4.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
3
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-16.8

A disastrous shooting performance from the perimeter completely tanked his offensive value. While he offered solid resistance on the defensive end (+4.7), bricking every single one of his deep attempts created too many empty possessions to overcome.

Shooting
FG 1/9 (11.1%)
3PT 0/6 (0.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 15.9%
USG% 18.6%
Net Rtg -41.5
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.8m
Scoring -3.2
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +1.2
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
12
pts
7
reb
4
ast
Impact
-0.5

Forcing up heavily contested looks from deep completely derailed his efficiency and hurt the team's transition defense. Although he found ways to contribute inside the arc, missing the vast majority of his three-point attempts created long rebounds that punished the team.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 45.0%
USG% 16.1%
Net Rtg -15.5
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.3m
Scoring +5.9
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +7.0
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
10
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.9

Capitalizing on a sudden spike in usage, he delivered excellent energy and timely shot-making to anchor the second unit. His ability to stretch the floor with a crucial three-pointer forced the defense to respect him, opening up driving lanes for teammates.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.2%
USG% 14.0%
Net Rtg +2.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.5m
Scoring +6.7
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +8.9
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 16.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Gabe Vincent 19.2m
2
pts
1
reb
4
ast
Impact
-7.5

Point-of-attack defensive pressure kept him somewhat viable (+6.5), but his offensive execution was virtually non-existent. Clanking all of his three-point attempts stalled out multiple possessions, neutralizing the value of his defensive effort.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 16.7%
USG% 11.3%
Net Rtg +25.0
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.2m
Scoring -2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +1.3
Defense +5.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
Jock Landale 18.5m
12
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.6

Ruthless efficiency around the basket defined this highly productive stint. He capitalized perfectly on his limited touches by converting nearly every look, providing a massive offensive jolt without demanding the ball.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 88.8%
USG% 14.5%
Net Rtg -12.9
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.5m
Scoring +10.8
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +6.7
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-16.0

A brief, forgettable cameo yielded purely negative results across the board. He missed his only perimeter look and offered zero resistance or hustle during his four minutes, causing a quick hook from the coaching staff.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg -54.4
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.6m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1