GAME ANALYSIS

GET THIS IN YOUR INBOX

Every breakdown for your team — free, the morning after the game.

Follow your team — free

Already have an account? Log in

Why this game is worth arguing about
game swinger
Victor Wembanyama actually won the night
19 points, 15 boards, 2 assists was the line. The lift came from hustle (+19.1), scoring (+13.0), and shot-making (+3.9), pushing Net Impact to +30.5.
Hustle +19.1
Rebounding and extra-possession work.
Scoring +13.0
Points, shot value, and miss penalties.
Shot-making +3.9
Makes above expected shot difficulty.
Check the tape
hidden value
Julian Champagnie's value was hiding in plain sight
12 points, 3 boards, 2 assists undersells it. scoring (+10.4), shot-making (+3.8), and defense (+3.7) pushed his Net Impact to +12.2.
Scoring +10.4
Points, shot value, and miss penalties.
Shot-making +3.8
Makes above expected shot difficulty.
Defense +3.7
Steals, blocks, fouls, and defensive events.
Check the tape
box score lie
The box score sold Keldon Johnson too hard
9 points, 10 boards, 1 assist was already a rough line. The real damage was defense (-3.2) and turnovers (-2.4), pulling Net Impact down to -2.0.
Defense -3.2
Steals, blocks, fouls, and defensive events.
Turnovers -2.4
Possessions destroyed by giveaways.
Shot-making +0.8
Makes above expected shot difficulty.
Check the tape
hidden value
Luke Kornet's value was hiding in plain sight
4 points, 2 boards, 1 assist undersells it. defense (+5.9), scoring (+4.0), and hustle (+0.6) pushed his Net Impact to +5.1.
Defense +5.9
Steals, blocks, fouls, and defensive events.
Scoring +4.0
Points, shot value, and miss penalties.
Hustle +0.6
Rebounding and extra-possession work.
Check the tape

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

SAS San Antonio Spurs
19
pts
15
reb
2
ast
Impact
+30.5

Total dominance on the glass (15 rebounds) and steady scoring fueled a massive +16.0 offensive credit. His sheer length dictated the terms of engagement defensively, contesting 8 shots and swatting 2 to anchor a robust +8.6 defensive mark.

Shooting
FG 7/15 (46.7%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.2%
USG% 27.3%
Net Rtg +23.2
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.9m
Scoring +13.0
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +19.1
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 2
S De'Aaron Fox 25.7m
16
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
+12.2

Highly efficient scoring across all three levels (5-of-10 FG, 2-of-2 3PT) drove a stellar +11.5 offensive credit. He complemented his scoring with active hands in passing lanes, swiping 2 steals to boost his defensive impact (+3.9) in a clean, controlled outing.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.6%
USG% 21.0%
Net Rtg +45.2
+/- +24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.7m
Scoring +11.9
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +0.0
Defense +3.2
Turnovers -2.4
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
S Stephon Castle 24.3m
21
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
+11.1

Relentless rim pressure and perfect execution at the foul line (9-of-9 FT) powered a brilliant +13.3 offensive credit. While 5 turnovers and 5 fouls showed some reckless decision-making, his 3 deflections and 2 steals (+3.4 hustle) proved he was playing with high-end energy.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 9/9 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 75.2%
USG% 29.2%
Net Rtg +31.5
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.3m
Scoring +17.7
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +5.1
Defense +2.3
Turnovers -12.6
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 5
12
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+12.2

Scorching perimeter marksmanship (4-of-6 from deep) powered a massive +11.2 offensive credit in a brilliant two-way performance. He was equally disruptive on the other end, racking up 2 steals and a block to secure a +5.7 defensive mark.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +42.6
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.0m
Scoring +10.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +0.9
Defense +3.7
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
S Devin Vassell 21.6m
10
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
+4.6

Flawless ball security (zero turnovers) and above-average playmaking (4 assists) anchored a strong +8.9 offensive credit despite a clunky 3-of-9 shooting night. He managed to orchestrate effectively, though his usual defensive disruption (zero steals or blocks) was completely absent.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.6%
USG% 15.5%
Net Rtg +24.2
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.6m
Scoring +5.4
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Dylan Harper 22.5m
11
pts
7
reb
5
ast
Impact
+9.6

Superb rebounding (7 boards) and crisp playmaking (5 assists) from the guard spot drove a well-rounded +6.8 offensive credit. He was a menace in the margins as well, recovering 2 loose balls and swiping 2 steals to anchor a +4.9 defensive mark.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 55.0%
USG% 19.7%
Net Rtg +47.0
+/- +24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.5m
Scoring +6.5
Creation +2.7
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +6.0
Defense +4.4
Turnovers -5.4
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
9
pts
10
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.0

A brutal 2-of-8 shooting night capped his scoring ceiling, though he managed to salvage a +4.0 offensive credit by drawing fouls (5-of-8 FT). His relentless work on the glass (10 rebounds, ↑↑ his 4.4 average) was the lone bright spot in an otherwise clunky performance.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 5/8 (62.5%)
Advanced
TS% 39.1%
USG% 25.5%
Net Rtg +64.9
+/- +28
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.1m
Scoring +2.6
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +5.9
Defense -3.2
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
2
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-12.1

Constant foul trouble (5 PFs in 15 minutes) completely derailed his rhythm and dragged his defensive credit down to -3.1. Missing both of his free throws and failing to connect from deep (0-of-2 3PT) left him with a negative offensive impact (-0.7).

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 25.8%
USG% 13.2%
Net Rtg +58.3
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.6m
Scoring -0.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +2.5
Defense -2.5
Turnovers -3.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
12
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.3

A highly efficient scoring burst (4-of-7 FG, 2-of-5 3PT) provided a massive lift off the bench, driving a +9.1 offensive credit. While he offered virtually zero playmaking or defensive resistance (-1.6 defense credit), his shot-making was exactly what the second unit needed.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.1%
USG% 23.7%
Net Rtg +58.3
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.4m
Scoring +9.6
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +2.5
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Luke Kornet 13.3m
4
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.1

Elite rim protection defined his brief 13 minutes, as 9 contests and 3 blocks fueled a massive +8.2 defensive credit. He was equally flawless on the other end, converting his only shot attempt and committing zero turnovers to secure a +5.8 offensive mark.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 106.4%
USG% 5.7%
Net Rtg +70.5
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.3m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +0.6
Defense +5.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 3
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.6

Flawless execution in a brief 10-minute cameo allowed him to post a +3.3 offensive credit, highlighted by 2 assists and zero turnovers. He also chipped in defensively with a steal and a deflection, proving to be a perfectly steadying presence at the end of the rotation.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 4.2%
Net Rtg -1.5
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.0m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.1
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Kelly Olynyk 10.0m
5
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-3.0

Hitting 2 of his 3 shots and dishing out 2 assists provided a tidy +3.5 offensive credit in just 10 minutes of action. He managed to stay active on the margins as well, recording a steal and a screen assist to round out a productive veteran shift.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -1.5
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.0m
Scoring +4.2
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
8
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+2.7

Catching fire from beyond the arc (2-of-4 3PT) allowed him to maximize his 8 minutes of floor time, driving a robust +7.3 offensive credit. He also chipped in with 4 rebounds (↑↑ his 0.9 average), providing an unexpected jolt of energy off the deep bench.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 80.0%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg -1.5
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.4m
Scoring +6.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +5.1
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.5

Converting one of his two shot attempts provided a minor +1.2 offensive bump during a brief 3-minute appearance. Beyond that single bucket, he failed to record any other counting stats, effectively functioning as a warm body at the end of the bench.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -67.9
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.2m
Scoring +1.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.9

Despite failing to attempt a shot or grab a rebound in his 3 minutes, he made his presence felt at the rim with 2 blocks. Those quick rejections drove a +1.8 defensive credit, allowing him to leave a positive imprint in a fleeting cameo.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -67.9
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.2m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +1.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
MIN Minnesota Timberwolves
S Rudy Gobert 28.1m
5
pts
10
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.4

A brutal night at the charity stripe (3-of-9 FT) and uncharacteristic sloppiness (4 turnovers) tanked his offensive value (-3.3 credit). While he contested 11 shots to anchor the paint, the lack of his usual rim protection (zero blocks) limited his defensive impact to just +0.6.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/9 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 31.4%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg -35.4
+/- -23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.1m
Scoring -0.9
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +11.7
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -10.9
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
S Julius Randle 27.4m
12
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.0

Sloppy decision-making hampered his offensive rhythm, as 5 turnovers (avg 3.1) dragged his offensive credit down to -0.3. Despite the struggles with the ball, he remained engaged without it, generating 2 steals (↑) to fuel a solid +4.7 defensive impact.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 49.2%
USG% 23.9%
Net Rtg -45.4
+/- -26
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.4m
Scoring +7.0
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +6.3
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -11.8
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 5
12
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.8

Attacking the basket kept his offensive credit afloat (+7.3) despite a frigid 4-of-12 shooting night from the floor. However, foul trouble (5 PFs) and defensive lapses (-2.1 defense credit) ultimately undermined his aggressive scoring efforts.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.6%
USG% 23.8%
Net Rtg -32.8
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.6m
Scoring +6.3
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +4.4
Defense -5.3
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Jaden McDaniels 19.6m
12
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
-1.4

Highly efficient interior finishing (6-of-10 FG) drove a strong +8.6 offensive credit, but foul trouble limited his overall rhythm. The lack of defensive playmaking (zero steals, -1.5 defense credit) and 5 personal fouls kept him from making his usual two-way impact.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 57.5%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg -15.7
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.6m
Scoring +8.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +2.8
Defense -7.3
Turnovers -2.2
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Mike Conley 15.8m
3
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-3.9

Quietly managing the game without a single turnover helped steady the offense, though his scoring punch was nearly non-existent (3 points on 1-of-4 shooting). A +2.2 defensive credit shows he was executing within the scheme, but the veteran simply lacked the volume to tilt the floor.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 10.8%
Net Rtg -31.9
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.8m
Scoring +0.7
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
12
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.5

Stagnant playmaking and poor ball security crippled his effectiveness, evidenced by 4 turnovers and zero assists dragging his offensive credit to -2.7. The inability to find his shooting rhythm (1-of-5 from deep) compounded a frustratingly passive performance.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.2%
USG% 25.4%
Net Rtg -61.1
+/- -33
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.1m
Scoring +5.9
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -8.2
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
Naz Reid 21.4m
11
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.5

Sizzling perimeter shooting (3-of-4 from deep) provided a vital scoring punch and drove a solid +5.0 offensive credit. He also brought excellent energy to the margins, generating 4 deflections to boost his hustle credit (+3.0) in a well-rounded bench shift.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 78.6%
USG% 15.0%
Net Rtg -56.9
+/- -26
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.4m
Scoring +9.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +2.1
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -4.7
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Jaylen Clark 15.0m
3
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.9

Clanking 4 of his 5 shot attempts limited his offensive impact (+0.1 credit) during his 15 minutes of action. He managed to stay engaged defensively, chipping in a steal to help secure a +1.6 defensive mark, but the lack of scoring punch was glaring.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 30.0%
USG% 13.5%
Net Rtg -24.2
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.0m
Scoring -0.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
8
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
-0.5

Connective playmaking and efficient interior finishing (3-of-6 FG) fueled a +4.8 offensive credit in a productive reserve shift. However, leaving points on the board at the charity stripe (2-of-6 FT) prevented him from maximizing his overall impact.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/6 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 46.3%
USG% 25.6%
Net Rtg -35.1
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.3m
Scoring +3.8
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +3.8
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -3.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Bones Hyland 10.8m
0
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-12.3

A scoreless outing (0-of-3 FG) completely neutralized his microwave scoring utility, resulting in a bleak -3.4 offensive credit. Without his jumper falling, he struggled to positively influence the game in his 10 minutes off the bench.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg -60.7
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.8m
Scoring -2.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Ayo Dosunmu 10.5m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.8

A complete offensive vanishing act defined this brief outing, as he failed to register a single point, rebound, or assist (-3.2 offense credit). He did manage to salvage some value on the other end, using his length to generate a block and a steal for a +3.5 defensive mark.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg -27.5
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.5m
Scoring -2.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
Joe Ingles 10.0m
7
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+5.8

Knocking down a pair of triples provided a quick offensive spark (+4.9 credit) in limited minutes. He surprisingly made his loudest statement on the other end, using active hands to swipe 2 steals and generate a robust +5.6 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 90.2%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +1.5
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.0m
Scoring +5.8
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -2.4
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
3
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.4

Hitting his only three-point attempt provided a minor offensive bump (+1.9 credit) during a brief 10-minute cameo. Beyond that single shot, he largely faded into the background, failing to grab a rebound or make a defensive impact (-0.8 credit).

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 12.0%
Net Rtg +1.5
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.0m
Scoring +1.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
7
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.9

Hyper-efficient finishing around the rim (3-of-4 FG) allowed him to maximize his brief 8 minutes of floor time, driving a +5.6 offensive credit. He also chipped in with 2 screen assists and 2 deflections, proving highly effective in his narrow role.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 71.7%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg +1.5
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.4m
Scoring +6.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +2.8
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1