Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
SAS lead MIN lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
MIN 2P — 3P —
SAS 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 178 attempts

MIN MIN Shot-making Δ

Edwards Hard 5/13 -1.5
Shannon Jr. 4/12 -5.7
McDaniels Hard 6/10 +3.5
Randle 4/10 -2.7
Reid Hard 4/7 +4.0
Anderson 3/6 +0.3
Clark Hard 1/5 -2.2
Beringer Open 3/4 +0.9
Conley Hard 1/4 -1.2
Gobert Open 1/4 -3.6

SAS SAS Shot-making Δ

Wembanyama 7/15 +0.1
Fox 5/10 +2.4
Castle Open 6/10 +0.4
Harper 5/10 -0.5
Vassell Hard 3/9 -1.6
Johnson Open 2/8 -6.6
Barnes Hard 4/7 +3.1
Champagnie Hard 4/6 +6.1
Waters III Hard 3/5 +2.6
Olynyk Hard 2/3 +1.8
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
MIN
SAS
35/88 Field Goals 45/90
39.8% Field Goal % 50.0%
9/30 3-Pointers 16/39
30.0% 3-Point % 41.0%
16/31 Free Throws 27/33
51.6% Free Throw % 81.8%
46.7% True Shooting % 63.6%
59 Total Rebounds 60
12 Offensive 13
31 Defensive 42
19 Assists 29
0.86 Assist/TO Ratio 1.81
22 Turnovers 15
7 Steals 13
2 Blocks 9
25 Fouls 28
36 Points in Paint 58
5 Fast Break Pts 29
17 Points off TOs 19
21 Second Chance Pts 14
51 Bench Points 55
1 Largest Lead 47
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Victor Wembanyama
19 PTS · 15 REB · 2 AST · 25.9 MIN
+21.08
2
Julian Champagnie
12 PTS · 3 REB · 2 AST · 22.0 MIN
+16.9
3
De'Aaron Fox
16 PTS · 0 REB · 2 AST · 25.7 MIN
+13.98
4
Stephon Castle
21 PTS · 4 REB · 4 AST · 24.3 MIN
+13.04
5
Dylan Harper
11 PTS · 7 REB · 5 AST · 22.5 MIN
+11.66
6
Luke Kornet
4 PTS · 2 REB · 1 AST · 13.3 MIN
+11.65
7
Joe Ingles
7 PTS · 2 REB · 0 AST · 10.0 MIN
+9.34
8
Devin Vassell
10 PTS · 5 REB · 4 AST · 21.6 MIN
+8.65
9
Lindy Waters III
8 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST · 8.4 MIN
+7.18
10
Harrison Barnes
12 PTS · 2 REB · 0 AST · 15.4 MIN
+6.74
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:03 K. Olynyk REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 95–133
Q4 0:03 M. Plumlee BLOCK (2 BLK) 95–133
Q4 0:03 MISS J. Beringer driving Layup - blocked 95–133
Q4 0:13 SAS shot clock Team TURNOVER 95–133
Q4 0:37 K. Anderson personal FOUL (2 PF) 95–133
Q4 0:44 J. Beringer driving reverse Layup (7 PTS) (K. Anderson 4 AST) 95–133
Q4 0:52 J. Ingles REBOUND (Off:1 Def:1) 93–133
Q4 0:54 MISS K. Olynyk 27' 3PT 93–133
Q4 1:07 J. Ingles 25' 3PT (7 PTS) (J. Clark 1 AST) 93–133
Q4 1:17 B. Biyombo 9' driving floating Jump Shot (2 PTS) (K. Olynyk 2 AST) 90–133
Q4 1:34 L. Waters III REBOUND (Off:2 Def:2) 90–131
Q4 1:34 M. Plumlee BLOCK (1 BLK) 90–131
Q4 1:34 MISS J. Phillips driving Layup - blocked 90–131
Q4 1:40 L. Waters III reverse Layup (8 PTS) (M. Plumlee 1 AST) 90–131
Q4 1:54 J. Phillips 25' 3PT (3 PTS) (K. Anderson 3 AST) 90–129

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Why this game is worth arguing about

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

SAS San Antonio Spurs
19
pts
15
reb
2
ast
Impact
+27.1

Total dominance on the glass (15 rebounds) and steady scoring fueled a massive +16.0 offensive credit. His sheer length dictated the terms of engagement defensively, contesting 8 shots and swatting 2 to anchor a robust +8.6 defensive mark.

Shooting
FG 7/15 (46.7%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.2%
USG% 27.3%
Net Rtg +23.2
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.9m
Scoring +13.0
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +19.1
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 2
S De'Aaron Fox 25.7m
16
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
+10.7

Highly efficient scoring across all three levels (5-of-10 FG, 2-of-2 3PT) drove a stellar +11.5 offensive credit. He complemented his scoring with active hands in passing lanes, swiping 2 steals to boost his defensive impact (+3.9) in a clean, controlled outing.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.6%
USG% 21.0%
Net Rtg +45.2
+/- +24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.7m
Scoring +11.9
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +0.0
Defense +3.2
Turnovers -2.4
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
S Stephon Castle 24.3m
21
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
+10.2

Relentless rim pressure and perfect execution at the foul line (9-of-9 FT) powered a brilliant +13.3 offensive credit. While 5 turnovers and 5 fouls showed some reckless decision-making, his 3 deflections and 2 steals (+3.4 hustle) proved he was playing with high-end energy.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 9/9 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 75.2%
USG% 29.2%
Net Rtg +31.5
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.3m
Scoring +17.7
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +5.1
Defense +2.3
Turnovers -12.6
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 5
12
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+11.7

Scorching perimeter marksmanship (4-of-6 from deep) powered a massive +11.2 offensive credit in a brilliant two-way performance. He was equally disruptive on the other end, racking up 2 steals and a block to secure a +5.7 defensive mark.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +42.6
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.0m
Scoring +10.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +0.9
Defense +3.7
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
S Devin Vassell 21.6m
10
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
+3.7

Flawless ball security (zero turnovers) and above-average playmaking (4 assists) anchored a strong +8.9 offensive credit despite a clunky 3-of-9 shooting night. He managed to orchestrate effectively, though his usual defensive disruption (zero steals or blocks) was completely absent.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.6%
USG% 15.5%
Net Rtg +24.2
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.6m
Scoring +5.4
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Dylan Harper 22.5m
11
pts
7
reb
5
ast
Impact
+9.6

Superb rebounding (7 boards) and crisp playmaking (5 assists) from the guard spot drove a well-rounded +6.8 offensive credit. He was a menace in the margins as well, recovering 2 loose balls and swiping 2 steals to anchor a +4.9 defensive mark.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 55.0%
USG% 19.7%
Net Rtg +47.0
+/- +24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.5m
Scoring +6.5
Creation +2.7
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +6.0
Defense +4.4
Turnovers -5.4
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
9
pts
10
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.3

A brutal 2-of-8 shooting night capped his scoring ceiling, though he managed to salvage a +4.0 offensive credit by drawing fouls (5-of-8 FT). His relentless work on the glass (10 rebounds, ↑↑ his 4.4 average) was the lone bright spot in an otherwise clunky performance.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 5/8 (62.5%)
Advanced
TS% 39.1%
USG% 25.5%
Net Rtg +64.9
+/- +28
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.1m
Scoring +2.6
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +5.9
Defense -3.2
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
2
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-10.5

Constant foul trouble (5 PFs in 15 minutes) completely derailed his rhythm and dragged his defensive credit down to -3.1. Missing both of his free throws and failing to connect from deep (0-of-2 3PT) left him with a negative offensive impact (-0.7).

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 25.8%
USG% 13.2%
Net Rtg +58.3
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.6m
Scoring -0.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +2.5
Defense -2.5
Turnovers -3.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
12
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.3

A highly efficient scoring burst (4-of-7 FG, 2-of-5 3PT) provided a massive lift off the bench, driving a +9.1 offensive credit. While he offered virtually zero playmaking or defensive resistance (-1.6 defense credit), his shot-making was exactly what the second unit needed.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.1%
USG% 23.7%
Net Rtg +58.3
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.4m
Scoring +9.6
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +2.5
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Luke Kornet 13.3m
4
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.9

Elite rim protection defined his brief 13 minutes, as 9 contests and 3 blocks fueled a massive +8.2 defensive credit. He was equally flawless on the other end, converting his only shot attempt and committing zero turnovers to secure a +5.8 offensive mark.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 106.4%
USG% 5.7%
Net Rtg +70.5
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.3m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +0.6
Defense +5.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 3
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.6

Flawless execution in a brief 10-minute cameo allowed him to post a +3.3 offensive credit, highlighted by 2 assists and zero turnovers. He also chipped in defensively with a steal and a deflection, proving to be a perfectly steadying presence at the end of the rotation.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 4.2%
Net Rtg -1.5
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.0m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.1
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Kelly Olynyk 10.0m
5
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-3.0

Hitting 2 of his 3 shots and dishing out 2 assists provided a tidy +3.5 offensive credit in just 10 minutes of action. He managed to stay active on the margins as well, recording a steal and a screen assist to round out a productive veteran shift.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -1.5
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.0m
Scoring +4.2
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
8
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+2.7

Catching fire from beyond the arc (2-of-4 3PT) allowed him to maximize his 8 minutes of floor time, driving a robust +7.3 offensive credit. He also chipped in with 4 rebounds (↑↑ his 0.9 average), providing an unexpected jolt of energy off the deep bench.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 80.0%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg -1.5
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.4m
Scoring +6.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +5.1
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.5

Converting one of his two shot attempts provided a minor +1.2 offensive bump during a brief 3-minute appearance. Beyond that single bucket, he failed to record any other counting stats, effectively functioning as a warm body at the end of the bench.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -67.9
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.2m
Scoring +1.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.9

Despite failing to attempt a shot or grab a rebound in his 3 minutes, he made his presence felt at the rim with 2 blocks. Those quick rejections drove a +1.8 defensive credit, allowing him to leave a positive imprint in a fleeting cameo.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -67.9
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.2m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +1.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
MIN Minnesota Timberwolves
S Rudy Gobert 28.1m
5
pts
10
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.6

A brutal night at the charity stripe (3-of-9 FT) and uncharacteristic sloppiness (4 turnovers) tanked his offensive value (-3.3 credit). While he contested 11 shots to anchor the paint, the lack of his usual rim protection (zero blocks) limited his defensive impact to just +0.6.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/9 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 31.4%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg -35.4
+/- -23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.1m
Scoring -0.9
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +11.7
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -10.9
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
S Julius Randle 27.4m
12
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.1

Sloppy decision-making hampered his offensive rhythm, as 5 turnovers (avg 3.1) dragged his offensive credit down to -0.3. Despite the struggles with the ball, he remained engaged without it, generating 2 steals (↑) to fuel a solid +4.7 defensive impact.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 49.2%
USG% 23.9%
Net Rtg -45.4
+/- -26
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.4m
Scoring +7.0
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +6.3
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -11.8
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 5
12
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.8

Attacking the basket kept his offensive credit afloat (+7.3) despite a frigid 4-of-12 shooting night from the floor. However, foul trouble (5 PFs) and defensive lapses (-2.1 defense credit) ultimately undermined his aggressive scoring efforts.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.6%
USG% 23.8%
Net Rtg -32.8
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.6m
Scoring +6.3
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +4.4
Defense -5.3
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Jaden McDaniels 19.6m
12
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
-1.6

Highly efficient interior finishing (6-of-10 FG) drove a strong +8.6 offensive credit, but foul trouble limited his overall rhythm. The lack of defensive playmaking (zero steals, -1.5 defense credit) and 5 personal fouls kept him from making his usual two-way impact.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 57.5%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg -15.7
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.6m
Scoring +8.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +2.8
Defense -7.3
Turnovers -2.2
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Mike Conley 15.8m
3
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-3.9

Quietly managing the game without a single turnover helped steady the offense, though his scoring punch was nearly non-existent (3 points on 1-of-4 shooting). A +2.2 defensive credit shows he was executing within the scheme, but the veteran simply lacked the volume to tilt the floor.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 10.8%
Net Rtg -31.9
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.8m
Scoring +0.7
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
12
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.6

Stagnant playmaking and poor ball security crippled his effectiveness, evidenced by 4 turnovers and zero assists dragging his offensive credit to -2.7. The inability to find his shooting rhythm (1-of-5 from deep) compounded a frustratingly passive performance.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.2%
USG% 25.4%
Net Rtg -61.1
+/- -33
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.1m
Scoring +5.9
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -8.2
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
Naz Reid 21.4m
11
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

Sizzling perimeter shooting (3-of-4 from deep) provided a vital scoring punch and drove a solid +5.0 offensive credit. He also brought excellent energy to the margins, generating 4 deflections to boost his hustle credit (+3.0) in a well-rounded bench shift.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 78.6%
USG% 15.0%
Net Rtg -56.9
+/- -26
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.4m
Scoring +9.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +2.1
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -4.7
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Jaylen Clark 15.0m
3
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.3

Clanking 4 of his 5 shot attempts limited his offensive impact (+0.1 credit) during his 15 minutes of action. He managed to stay engaged defensively, chipping in a steal to help secure a +1.6 defensive mark, but the lack of scoring punch was glaring.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 30.0%
USG% 13.5%
Net Rtg -24.2
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.0m
Scoring -0.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
8
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
-0.5

Connective playmaking and efficient interior finishing (3-of-6 FG) fueled a +4.8 offensive credit in a productive reserve shift. However, leaving points on the board at the charity stripe (2-of-6 FT) prevented him from maximizing his overall impact.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/6 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 46.3%
USG% 25.6%
Net Rtg -35.1
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.3m
Scoring +3.8
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +3.8
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -3.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Bones Hyland 10.8m
0
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-11.6

A scoreless outing (0-of-3 FG) completely neutralized his microwave scoring utility, resulting in a bleak -3.4 offensive credit. Without his jumper falling, he struggled to positively influence the game in his 10 minutes off the bench.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg -60.7
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.8m
Scoring -2.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Ayo Dosunmu 10.5m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.9

A complete offensive vanishing act defined this brief outing, as he failed to register a single point, rebound, or assist (-3.2 offense credit). He did manage to salvage some value on the other end, using his length to generate a block and a steal for a +3.5 defensive mark.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg -27.5
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.5m
Scoring -2.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
3
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.4

Hitting his only three-point attempt provided a minor offensive bump (+1.9 credit) during a brief 10-minute cameo. Beyond that single shot, he largely faded into the background, failing to grab a rebound or make a defensive impact (-0.8 credit).

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 12.0%
Net Rtg +1.5
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.0m
Scoring +1.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Joe Ingles 10.0m
7
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+5.8

Knocking down a pair of triples provided a quick offensive spark (+4.9 credit) in limited minutes. He surprisingly made his loudest statement on the other end, using active hands to swipe 2 steals and generate a robust +5.6 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 90.2%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +1.5
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.0m
Scoring +5.8
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -2.4
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
7
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.9

Hyper-efficient finishing around the rim (3-of-4 FG) allowed him to maximize his brief 8 minutes of floor time, driving a +5.6 offensive credit. He also chipped in with 2 screen assists and 2 deflections, proving highly effective in his narrow role.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 71.7%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg +1.5
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.4m
Scoring +6.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +2.8
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1