Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
SAS lead MIN lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
MIN 2P — 3P —
SAS 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 177 attempts

MIN MIN Shot-making Δ

Randle 8/20 -3.2
McDaniels 7/14 -0.7
Edwards 8/13 +4.3
Shannon Jr. Open 5/13 -5.7
Conley Hard 4/8 +3.4
Reid 5/8 +2.6
Gobert Open 3/7 -3.0
Hyland 0/6 -6.6
Clark Hard 1/1 +1.1

SAS SAS Shot-making Δ

Wembanyama 5/17 -8.7
Fox 5/14 -6.1
Harper Open 7/13 -1.4
Champagnie 7/12 +2.5
Vassell Hard 5/11 +1.7
Johnson Open 5/10 -2.1
Castle Hard 4/8 +2.6
Barnes Open 1/1 +0.6
Kornet Open 0/1 -1.4
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
MIN
SAS
41/90 Field Goals 39/87
45.6% Field Goal % 44.8%
10/26 3-Pointers 10/36
38.5% 3-Point % 27.8%
12/21 Free Throws 14/18
57.1% Free Throw % 77.8%
52.4% True Shooting % 53.7%
58 Total Rebounds 52
12 Offensive 13
34 Defensive 34
20 Assists 24
1.54 Assist/TO Ratio 1.71
10 Turnovers 13
7 Steals 4
5 Blocks 14
22 Fouls 25
52 Points in Paint 58
10 Fast Break Pts 27
11 Points off TOs 15
20 Second Chance Pts 13
32 Bench Points 33
9 Largest Lead 7
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Devin Vassell
14 PTS · 5 REB · 3 AST · 36.4 MIN
+17.77
2
Rudy Gobert
7 PTS · 10 REB · 3 AST · 29.7 MIN
+14.66
3
Julian Champagnie
17 PTS · 7 REB · 0 AST · 31.9 MIN
+14.26
4
Anthony Edwards
18 PTS · 3 REB · 3 AST · 25.2 MIN
+14.05
5
Dylan Harper
18 PTS · 4 REB · 4 AST · 28.9 MIN
+13.23
6
Victor Wembanyama
11 PTS · 15 REB · 5 AST · 39.9 MIN
+11.5
7
Mike Conley
12 PTS · 2 REB · 6 AST · 24.2 MIN
+11.44
8
Jaden McDaniels
16 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 35.6 MIN
+11.3
9
Stephon Castle
17 PTS · 5 REB · 5 AST · 28.3 MIN
+11.18
10
Naz Reid
12 PTS · 9 REB · 1 AST · 29.7 MIN
+7.72
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:00 TEAM offensive REBOUND 104–102
Q4 0:00 MISS J. Champagnie 26' pullup 3PT 104–102
Q4 0:06 D. Harper REBOUND (Off:0 Def:4) 104–102
Q4 0:08 MISS J. Randle 17' pullup Shot 104–102
Q4 0:30 D. Harper running DUNK (18 PTS) 104–102
Q4 0:32 D. Vassell STEAL (3 STL) 104–100
Q4 0:32 A. Edwards bad pass TURNOVER (1 TO) 104–100
Q4 0:43 V. Wembanyama driving DUNK (11 PTS) (D. Fox 6 AST) 104–100
Q4 0:49 J. Randle 8' driving floating bank Jump Shot (21 PTS) 104–98
Q4 1:07 J. Champagnie putback Layup (17 PTS) 102–98
Q4 1:07 J. Champagnie REBOUND (Off:3 Def:4) 102–96
Q4 1:08 MISS V. Wembanyama 13' Jump Shot 102–96
Q4 1:09 J. Champagnie REBOUND (Off:2 Def:4) 102–96
Q4 1:11 MISS V. Wembanyama driving Layup 102–96
Q4 1:19 R. Gobert Free Throw 2 of 2 (7 PTS) 102–96

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

SAS San Antonio Spurs
11
pts
15
reb
5
ast
Impact
-0.9

Wembanyama completely erased the rim, logging an absurd 12 blocks (avg 3.5) and 19 contests to generate a monstrous +15.3 defensive credit while holding opponents to 30% shooting. His offensive impact (+0.1 credit) was muted by a brutal 5-of-17 shooting night, including an 0-of-8 mark from beyond the arc.

Shooting
FG 5/17 (29.4%)
3PT 0/8 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 30.8%
USG% 23.3%
Net Rtg +6.1
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.9m
Scoring +1.3
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +7.4
Defense +4.0
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 0
BLK 12
TO 3
S Devin Vassell 36.4m
14
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+12.0

Vassell was an absolute menace in the passing lanes, racking up 6 deflections and 3 steals to drive a +6.1 defensive credit. He paired that disruptive energy with a smooth offensive outing (+12.6 credit), burying 3-of-6 from deep to stretch the floor effectively.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.2%
USG% 14.1%
Net Rtg +8.2
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.4m
Scoring +9.7
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +6.3
Defense +4.2
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 1
S De'Aaron Fox 33.1m
10
pts
3
reb
6
ast
Impact
-16.7

Careless ball security derailed Fox's night, as his 6 turnovers (avg 2.1) and clunky 5-of-14 shooting dragged his offensive credit down to -5.8. He did show some defensive bite by holding his matchups to a 40% clip, but his inability to find a rhythm from deep (0-of-4 3P) stalled the offense.

Shooting
FG 5/14 (35.7%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 35.7%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -20.2
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.1m
Scoring +3.3
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -14.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 6
17
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
+8.4

Champagnie capitalized on his scoring opportunities to generate a team-high +14.9 offensive credit, shooting an efficient 7-of-12 from the field while grabbing 7 rebounds. However, his defensive resistance was lacking, as he allowed his matchups to shoot 62% when guarded.

Shooting
FG 7/12 (58.3%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 70.8%
USG% 17.8%
Net Rtg +9.3
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.9m
Scoring +13.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +5.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Stephon Castle 28.3m
17
pts
5
reb
5
ast
Impact
+6.3

Castle orchestrated the offense flawlessly, blending 5 assists with zero turnovers to power a stellar +15.9 offensive credit. While his overall defensive credit (-1.5) was negative, he still managed to suffocate his primary assignments into a dismal 2-of-10 shooting performance.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 6/8 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 73.8%
USG% 20.7%
Net Rtg +11.6
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.3m
Scoring +13.0
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +1.5
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Dylan Harper 28.9m
18
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
+8.2

Harper provided a massive scoring lift (+15.7 offensive credit), efficiently converting 7-of-13 shots to easily surpass his season average. He also locked down the perimeter, holding his matchups to just 2-of-8 shooting despite a negative overall defensive credit (-1.8).

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.8%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -4.9
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.9m
Scoring +13.4
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +1.2
Defense -1.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
11
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.7

Johnson delivered a tidy, mistake-free offensive shift, shooting 5-of-10 from the floor with zero turnovers to earn a +6.8 offensive credit. His defensive impact was less pronounced, as he yielded a 58% shooting clip to his matchups despite logging 7 contests.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.6%
USG% 20.4%
Net Rtg -21.8
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.5m
Scoring +6.8
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.6

Barnes was highly effective in his limited 10-minute run, securing 4 rebounds and converting his only shot attempt to post a +5.8 offensive credit. He also provided sturdy resistance defensively, holding his matchups to 1-of-4 shooting.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 4.8%
Net Rtg +15.7
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.9m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +5.1
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
2
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.8

Kornet struggled to make his presence felt during his 8 minutes, failing to hit a field goal while committing 2 turnovers to limit his offensive credit to +0.6. He was actively targeted on the other end, allowing opponents to shoot a blistering 5-of-7 when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.2%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg -50.0
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.1m
Scoring +1.3
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
MIN Minnesota Timberwolves
S Julius Randle 41.5m
21
pts
10
reb
2
ast
Impact
+3.4

A heavy volume of empty possessions marred his night, as 5 turnovers (avg 3.0) and inefficient shooting (8-of-20 FG) limited his offensive credit to +8.0 despite scoring 21 points. He did hit the glass effectively with 10 rebounds, generating a +4.8 hustle score, but leaked value defensively by allowing his matchups to shoot 58%.

Shooting
FG 8/20 (40.0%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 3/6 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 46.4%
USG% 27.5%
Net Rtg -3.6
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 41.5m
Scoring +10.4
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +4.4
Hustle +8.8
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -11.3
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 5
S Jaden McDaniels 35.6m
16
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+4.9

McDaniels leveraged efficient interior finishing (7-of-14 FG) to generate a strong +11.1 offensive credit, though his perimeter shot (0-of-2 3P) remained absent. He held his own defensively (+2.9 credit), keeping his primary assignments to a modest 47% shooting clip while adding 5 contests.

Shooting
FG 7/14 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.8%
USG% 19.8%
Net Rtg +1.8
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.6m
Scoring +11.1
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.4
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
16
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.9

Shannon Jr. aggressively hunted his own offense to generate a +9.9 offensive credit, supplementing his 5-of-13 shooting with frequent trips to the free-throw line (6-of-8 FT). However, his defensive impact was virtually nonexistent (-0.1 credit), as opponents shot a blistering 62% when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 6/8 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 48.4%
USG% 19.8%
Net Rtg -14.1
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.8m
Scoring +8.9
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +1.5
Defense -3.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Rudy Gobert 29.7m
7
pts
10
reb
3
ast
Impact
+9.6

Gobert anchored the interior with absolute authority, generating a massive +12.4 defensive credit by suffocating his matchups (5-of-15 shooting) and logging 9 contests. His active hands yielded 4 steals (avg 1.0), ensuring he impacted the game heavily despite a quiet 7-point scoring night.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/5 (20.0%)
Advanced
TS% 38.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +5.1
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.7m
Scoring +1.9
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +8.8
Defense +8.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 4
BLK 1
TO 1
S Mike Conley 24.2m
12
pts
2
reb
6
ast
Impact
+3.2

Flawless decision-making defined Conley's performance, as he dished out 6 assists without committing a single turnover to drive a +11.6 offensive credit. He found his perimeter stroke as well, burying 4-of-7 from deep to easily surpass his season scoring average.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 13.8%
Net Rtg +25.0
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.2m
Scoring +9.2
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Naz Reid 29.7m
12
pts
9
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.4

Reid provided a highly efficient scoring punch (5-of-8 FG) to post a +7.4 offensive credit, hitting twice from beyond the arc. He was equally impressive on the other end, using 5 contests to stifle his matchups into 36% shooting and secure a +2.4 defensive mark.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 14.5%
Net Rtg +23.3
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.7m
Scoring +9.8
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +4.6
Defense -4.2
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 35.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
18
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+10.0

Edwards operated with lethal efficiency, converting 8 of his 13 field goal attempts to fuel a robust +14.8 offensive credit. He complemented his scoring with disciplined perimeter defense, logging 6 contests and holding his primary matchups to a 42% shooting clip.

Shooting
FG 8/13 (61.5%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 69.2%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -4.0
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.2m
Scoring +14.2
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +5.0
Hustle +2.8
Defense -0.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Bones Hyland 11.9m
0
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-10.3

A complete lack of shot-making torpedoed Hyland's stint, as he bricked all six of his attempts to produce a detrimental -4.1 offensive credit. He managed to salvage some value on the other end (+3.5 defensive credit) by chipping in a steal and a block, but the scoring void was glaring.

Shooting
FG 0/6 (0.0%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg -7.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.9m
Scoring -4.6
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.8

Clark made the most of his brief 7-minute cameo by locking down his assignments, holding opponents to 1-of-4 shooting to generate a +0.9 defensive credit. He added 2 deflections and converted his only shot attempt, providing a small but positive two-way spark.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 5.3%
Net Rtg -5.9
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.3m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0