GAME ANALYSIS

GET THIS IN YOUR INBOX

Every breakdown for your team — free, the morning after the game.

Follow your team — free

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

SAS San Antonio Spurs
11
pts
15
reb
5
ast
Impact
+2.5

Wembanyama completely erased the rim, logging an absurd 12 blocks (avg 3.5) and 19 contests to generate a monstrous +15.3 defensive credit while holding opponents to 30% shooting. His offensive impact (+0.1 credit) was muted by a brutal 5-of-17 shooting night, including an 0-of-8 mark from beyond the arc.

Shooting
FG 5/17 (29.4%)
3PT 0/8 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 30.8%
USG% 23.3%
Net Rtg +6.1
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.9m
Scoring +1.3
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +7.4
Defense +4.0
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 0
BLK 12
TO 3
S Devin Vassell 36.4m
14
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+13.0

Vassell was an absolute menace in the passing lanes, racking up 6 deflections and 3 steals to drive a +6.1 defensive credit. He paired that disruptive energy with a smooth offensive outing (+12.6 credit), burying 3-of-6 from deep to stretch the floor effectively.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.2%
USG% 14.1%
Net Rtg +8.2
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.4m
Scoring +9.7
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +6.3
Defense +4.2
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 1
S De'Aaron Fox 33.1m
10
pts
3
reb
6
ast
Impact
-15.2

Careless ball security derailed Fox's night, as his 6 turnovers (avg 2.1) and clunky 5-of-14 shooting dragged his offensive credit down to -5.8. He did show some defensive bite by holding his matchups to a 40% clip, but his inability to find a rhythm from deep (0-of-4 3P) stalled the offense.

Shooting
FG 5/14 (35.7%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 35.7%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -20.2
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.1m
Scoring +3.3
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -14.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 6
17
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
+9.0

Champagnie capitalized on his scoring opportunities to generate a team-high +14.9 offensive credit, shooting an efficient 7-of-12 from the field while grabbing 7 rebounds. However, his defensive resistance was lacking, as he allowed his matchups to shoot 62% when guarded.

Shooting
FG 7/12 (58.3%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 70.8%
USG% 17.8%
Net Rtg +9.3
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.9m
Scoring +13.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +5.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Stephon Castle 28.3m
17
pts
5
reb
5
ast
Impact
+7.1

Castle orchestrated the offense flawlessly, blending 5 assists with zero turnovers to power a stellar +15.9 offensive credit. While his overall defensive credit (-1.5) was negative, he still managed to suffocate his primary assignments into a dismal 2-of-10 shooting performance.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 6/8 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 73.8%
USG% 20.7%
Net Rtg +11.6
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.3m
Scoring +13.0
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +1.5
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Dylan Harper 28.9m
18
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
+8.2

Harper provided a massive scoring lift (+15.7 offensive credit), efficiently converting 7-of-13 shots to easily surpass his season average. He also locked down the perimeter, holding his matchups to just 2-of-8 shooting despite a negative overall defensive credit (-1.8).

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.8%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -4.9
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.9m
Scoring +13.4
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +1.2
Defense -1.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
11
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.4

Johnson delivered a tidy, mistake-free offensive shift, shooting 5-of-10 from the floor with zero turnovers to earn a +6.8 offensive credit. His defensive impact was less pronounced, as he yielded a 58% shooting clip to his matchups despite logging 7 contests.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.6%
USG% 20.4%
Net Rtg -21.8
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.5m
Scoring +6.8
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.6

Barnes was highly effective in his limited 10-minute run, securing 4 rebounds and converting his only shot attempt to post a +5.8 offensive credit. He also provided sturdy resistance defensively, holding his matchups to 1-of-4 shooting.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 4.8%
Net Rtg +15.7
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.9m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +5.1
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
2
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.7

Kornet struggled to make his presence felt during his 8 minutes, failing to hit a field goal while committing 2 turnovers to limit his offensive credit to +0.6. He was actively targeted on the other end, allowing opponents to shoot a blistering 5-of-7 when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.2%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg -50.0
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.1m
Scoring +1.3
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
MIN Minnesota Timberwolves
S Julius Randle 41.5m
21
pts
10
reb
2
ast
Impact
+3.2

A heavy volume of empty possessions marred his night, as 5 turnovers (avg 3.0) and inefficient shooting (8-of-20 FG) limited his offensive credit to +8.0 despite scoring 21 points. He did hit the glass effectively with 10 rebounds, generating a +4.8 hustle score, but leaked value defensively by allowing his matchups to shoot 58%.

Shooting
FG 8/20 (40.0%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 3/6 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 46.4%
USG% 27.5%
Net Rtg -3.6
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 41.5m
Scoring +10.4
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +4.4
Hustle +8.8
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -11.3
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 5
S Jaden McDaniels 35.6m
16
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.1

McDaniels leveraged efficient interior finishing (7-of-14 FG) to generate a strong +11.1 offensive credit, though his perimeter shot (0-of-2 3P) remained absent. He held his own defensively (+2.9 credit), keeping his primary assignments to a modest 47% shooting clip while adding 5 contests.

Shooting
FG 7/14 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.8%
USG% 19.8%
Net Rtg +1.8
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.6m
Scoring +11.1
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.4
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
16
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.9

Shannon Jr. aggressively hunted his own offense to generate a +9.9 offensive credit, supplementing his 5-of-13 shooting with frequent trips to the free-throw line (6-of-8 FT). However, his defensive impact was virtually nonexistent (-0.1 credit), as opponents shot a blistering 62% when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 6/8 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 48.4%
USG% 19.8%
Net Rtg -14.1
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.8m
Scoring +8.9
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +1.5
Defense -3.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Rudy Gobert 29.7m
7
pts
10
reb
3
ast
Impact
+11.8

Gobert anchored the interior with absolute authority, generating a massive +12.4 defensive credit by suffocating his matchups (5-of-15 shooting) and logging 9 contests. His active hands yielded 4 steals (avg 1.0), ensuring he impacted the game heavily despite a quiet 7-point scoring night.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/5 (20.0%)
Advanced
TS% 38.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +5.1
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.7m
Scoring +1.9
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +8.8
Defense +8.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 4
BLK 1
TO 1
S Mike Conley 24.2m
12
pts
2
reb
6
ast
Impact
+3.2

Flawless decision-making defined Conley's performance, as he dished out 6 assists without committing a single turnover to drive a +11.6 offensive credit. He found his perimeter stroke as well, burying 4-of-7 from deep to easily surpass his season scoring average.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 13.8%
Net Rtg +25.0
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.2m
Scoring +9.2
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Naz Reid 29.7m
12
pts
9
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.2

Reid provided a highly efficient scoring punch (5-of-8 FG) to post a +7.4 offensive credit, hitting twice from beyond the arc. He was equally impressive on the other end, using 5 contests to stifle his matchups into 36% shooting and secure a +2.4 defensive mark.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 14.5%
Net Rtg +23.3
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.7m
Scoring +9.8
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +4.6
Defense -4.2
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 35.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
18
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+11.2

Edwards operated with lethal efficiency, converting 8 of his 13 field goal attempts to fuel a robust +14.8 offensive credit. He complemented his scoring with disciplined perimeter defense, logging 6 contests and holding his primary matchups to a 42% shooting clip.

Shooting
FG 8/13 (61.5%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 69.2%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -4.0
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.2m
Scoring +14.2
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +5.0
Hustle +2.8
Defense -0.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Bones Hyland 11.9m
0
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-11.1

A complete lack of shot-making torpedoed Hyland's stint, as he bricked all six of his attempts to produce a detrimental -4.1 offensive credit. He managed to salvage some value on the other end (+3.5 defensive credit) by chipping in a steal and a block, but the scoring void was glaring.

Shooting
FG 0/6 (0.0%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg -7.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.9m
Scoring -4.6
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.4

Clark made the most of his brief 7-minute cameo by locking down his assignments, holding opponents to 1-of-4 shooting to generate a +0.9 defensive credit. He added 2 deflections and converted his only shot attempt, providing a small but positive two-way spark.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 5.3%
Net Rtg -5.9
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.3m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0