Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
MIN lead SAS lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
SAS 2P — 3P —
MIN 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 184 attempts

SAS SAS Shot-making Δ

Fox 7/19 -5.2
Wembanyama 13/18 +9.4
Vassell Hard 6/14 -0.6
Castle 3/11 -4.9
Johnson Hard 3/7 +0.4
Champagnie Hard 2/7 -2.1
Harper 2/6 -2.3
Bryant Hard 2/2 +3.8
Kornet Hard 1/1 +1.1

MIN MIN Shot-making Δ

Edwards Hard 12/26 +2.4
McDaniels 5/22 -10.0
Reid Hard 6/13 +2.8
Dosunmu Hard 4/12 -2.0
Randle 3/12 -7.9
Gobert Open 6/7 +3.6
Shannon Jr. 2/6 -1.8
Conley Hard 0/1 -1.1
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
SAS
MIN
39/85 Field Goals 38/99
45.9% Field Goal % 38.4%
12/33 3-Pointers 14/40
36.4% 3-Point % 35.0%
25/33 Free Throws 18/21
75.8% Free Throw % 85.7%
57.8% True Shooting % 49.9%
55 Total Rebounds 63
8 Offensive 15
40 Defensive 39
26 Assists 22
2.60 Assist/TO Ratio 1.83
9 Turnovers 12
9 Steals 3
7 Blocks 7
23 Fouls 25
46 Points in Paint 38
13 Fast Break Pts 7
15 Points off TOs 13
12 Second Chance Pts 30
27 Bench Points 34
15 Largest Lead 4
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Victor Wembanyama
39 PTS · 15 REB · 1 AST · 37.0 MIN
+39.96
2
Anthony Edwards
32 PTS · 14 REB · 6 AST · 40.5 MIN
+20.9
3
Rudy Gobert
13 PTS · 7 REB · 2 AST · 31.2 MIN
+17.46
4
Naz Reid
18 PTS · 9 REB · 5 AST · 32.0 MIN
+16.08
5
Julian Champagnie
6 PTS · 12 REB · 3 AST · 28.9 MIN
+13.78
6
Devin Vassell
13 PTS · 6 REB · 3 AST · 36.2 MIN
+11.69
7
Keldon Johnson
11 PTS · 2 REB · 1 AST · 18.8 MIN
+9.33
8
Jaden McDaniels
17 PTS · 7 REB · 2 AST · 40.4 MIN
+8.43
9
De'Aaron Fox
17 PTS · 3 REB · 5 AST · 34.8 MIN
+6.75
10
Dylan Harper
8 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST · 20.1 MIN
+5.1
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:08 D. Vassell REBOUND (Off:1 Def:5) 115–108
Q4 0:10 MISS J. McDaniels 25' pullup 3PT 115–108
Q4 0:16 D. Harper Free Throw 2 of 2 (8 PTS) 115–108
Q4 0:16 D. Harper Free Throw 1 of 2 (7 PTS) 114–108
Q4 0:16 N. Reid take personal FOUL (4 PF) (Harper 2 FT) 113–108
Q4 0:23 A. Edwards 24' 3PT turnaround (32 PTS) (A. Dosunmu 5 AST) 113–108
Q4 0:26 S. Castle take personal FOUL (3 PF) 113–105
Q4 0:29 V. Wembanyama Free Throw 2 of 2 (39 PTS) 113–105
Q4 0:29 V. Wembanyama Free Throw 1 of 2 (38 PTS) 112–105
Q4 0:29 A. Edwards personal FOUL (5 PF) (Wembanyama 2 FT) 111–105
Q4 0:37 J. Champagnie REBOUND (Off:4 Def:8) 111–105
Q4 0:39 MISS A. Edwards 25' pullup 3PT 111–105
Q4 0:51 A. Dosunmu REBOUND (Off:1 Def:6) 111–105
Q4 0:53 MISS J. Champagnie tip Layup 111–105
Q4 0:53 J. Champagnie REBOUND (Off:4 Def:7) 111–105

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

MIN Minnesota Timberwolves
S Anthony Edwards 40.5m
32
pts
14
reb
6
ast
Impact
+22.6

Anthony Edwards operated as a relentless offensive engine, pouring in 32 points (↑) and dishing 6 assists (↑) to drive a massive +21.5 Offense credit. He compounded his scoring impact with a dominant effort on the glass, grabbing 14 rebounds (↑) to control the flow of the game.

Shooting
FG 12/26 (46.2%)
3PT 3/9 (33.3%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 55.9%
USG% 30.7%
Net Rtg -11.5
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.5m
Scoring +22.2
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +7.7
Hustle +10.0
Defense -3.5
Turnovers -3.5
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Jaden McDaniels 40.4m
17
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.0

Jaden McDaniels endured a brutal shooting night, clanking his way to a 5-of-22 mark from the floor. He tried to salvage his value with active rebounding (7 boards, ↑) and 9 shot contests, but the sheer volume of missed shots severely capped his offensive output.

Shooting
FG 5/22 (22.7%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 35.8%
USG% 24.3%
Net Rtg -15.1
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.4m
Scoring +5.1
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +7.0
Defense -2.1
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
S Rudy Gobert 31.2m
13
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+9.9

Rudy Gobert was a model of interior efficiency, converting 6 of his 7 attempts to anchor a +16.2 Offense credit. He paired this with his standard rim deterrence, logging 11 contests and 3 blocks (↑) to solidify the paint defensively.

Shooting
FG 6/7 (85.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 87.4%
USG% 10.5%
Net Rtg -9.2
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.2m
Scoring +12.3
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +8.9
Defense -0.4
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 1
S Julius Randle 31.2m
12
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.2

Julius Randle's offensive execution was painfully clunky, managing just 12 points (↓) on a dismal 3-of-12 shooting performance. His inability to facilitate (0 assists, ↓) combined with 2 turnovers further dragged down a sluggish showing, keeping his Offense credit to a modest +7.2.

Shooting
FG 3/12 (25.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.0%
USG% 20.7%
Net Rtg -15.2
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.2m
Scoring +5.2
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +6.7
Defense -2.6
Turnovers -5.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Mike Conley 4.2m
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-14.4

Mike Conley was entirely ineffective during his brief 4-minute stint, failing to score (↓) or record a single assist (↓). A turnover and a missed three-pointer resulted in a negative Offense credit (-2.8), reflecting his inability to organize the second unit.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.2m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Naz Reid 32.0m
18
pts
9
reb
5
ast
Impact
+14.6

Naz Reid provided a massive two-way spark, stretching the floor with 4 triples while playing entirely mistake-free basketball (0 turnovers). His combination of perimeter scoring and sharp passing (5 assists, ↑) fueled a robust +16.1 Offense credit, while 7 contests and 2 blocks (↑) anchored his defensive value.

Shooting
FG 6/13 (46.2%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.0%
USG% 18.5%
Net Rtg +4.4
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.0m
Scoring +12.2
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +5.0
Hustle +11.4
Defense -2.7
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
Ayo Dosunmu 32.0m
11
pts
7
reb
5
ast
Impact
-7.2

Ayo Dosunmu's playmaking was overshadowed by sloppy decision-making, as 4 turnovers (↓) severely penalized his offensive output. Despite grabbing 7 rebounds (↑) and hitting 3 triples, his inefficient 4-of-12 shooting left him with a nearly flat +0.2 Offense credit.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 45.8%
USG% 19.5%
Net Rtg -5.5
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.0m
Scoring +4.4
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +6.0
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -8.2
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
5
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-13.6

Terrence Shannon Jr. struggled to find the bottom of the net, scoring just 5 points (↓) on 33% shooting to yield a muted +0.7 Offense credit. However, he made his presence felt entirely through grit, drawing 2 charges to generate an impressive +6.0 Hustle score.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 41.7%
USG% 9.5%
Net Rtg +31.7
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.4m
Scoring +1.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +0.6
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
SAS San Antonio Spurs
S Stephon Castle 39.9m
13
pts
4
reb
12
ast
Impact
-11.0

Stephon Castle operated as a high-volume facilitator, dishing out 12 assists (↑) to keep the offense humming despite his own shooting woes (3-of-11 FG). However, his aggressive playmaking came with a cost, as 4 turnovers (↓) dragged down his overall efficiency and limited his Offense credit to +4.8.

Shooting
FG 3/11 (27.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 6/8 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.8%
USG% 20.2%
Net Rtg +18.5
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.9m
Scoring +5.8
Creation +3.3
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +1.2
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -10.9
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
39
pts
15
reb
1
ast
Impact
+38.7

Victor Wembanyama was an absolute two-way terror, pairing hyper-efficient scoring (39 points on 72% shooting) with overwhelming rim protection (5 blocks, 16 contests). His dominant interior presence anchored a +9.9 Defense credit, while his ability to draw fouls (10-of-12 FT) and hit from deep fueled a massive +36.2 Offense mark.

Shooting
FG 13/18 (72.2%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 10/12 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 83.8%
USG% 28.2%
Net Rtg +20.5
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.0m
Scoring +34.4
Creation +2.7
Shot Making +6.6
Hustle +8.4
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 5
TO 1
S Devin Vassell 36.2m
13
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+8.7

Devin Vassell's defensive activity was a bright spot, generating 4 deflections and 2 steals (↑) to fuel a +5.3 Defense credit. However, his perimeter stroke continued to struggle (1-of-6 from deep), limiting his overall offensive ceiling despite a solid +7.1 Offense mark.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 46.4%
USG% 17.2%
Net Rtg +11.7
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.2m
Scoring +7.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +7.6
Defense +4.1
Turnovers -2.4
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
S De'Aaron Fox 34.8m
17
pts
3
reb
5
ast
Impact
-1.9

De'Aaron Fox struggled to find his rhythm from the floor, clanking his way to a 37% shooting night and hitting just 1-of-5 from deep. His playmaking (5 assists, ↓) wasn't enough to offset the scoring inefficiency, resulting in a muted +6.8 Offense credit.

Shooting
FG 7/19 (36.8%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 41.8%
USG% 25.6%
Net Rtg -1.2
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.8m
Scoring +7.2
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +2.8
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -5.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
6
pts
12
reb
3
ast
Impact
+8.5

A massive rebounding night (12 boards, ↑) defined Julian Champagnie's performance, allowing him to impact the game heavily despite a cold shooting night (6 points on 29% FG). He compensated for the scoring dip with active hands, tallying 3 deflections and zero turnovers to drive a +5.5 Defense and +8.6 Offense credit.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 42.9%
USG% 10.4%
Net Rtg +9.8
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.9m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +12.3
Defense +4.1
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
Dylan Harper 20.1m
8
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.4

Dylan Harper's scoring punch was noticeably absent, finishing well below his season average with just 8 points (↓) on 33% shooting. He managed to salvage some value on the other end, using 5 contests and 2 deflections to post a +3.3 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 46.3%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg -8.6
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.1m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +5.1
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
11
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.1

Keldon Johnson provided an efficient, mistake-free spark off the bench, knocking down 2-of-4 from deep without committing a single turnover. His clean offensive execution drove a solid +8.4 Offense credit, though his rebounding (2 boards, ↓) was unusually quiet.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.8%
USG% 19.6%
Net Rtg -24.3
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.8m
Scoring +7.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Luke Kornet 10.5m
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-13.2

Luke Kornet was largely invisible during his 10 minutes of action, failing to make a dent on the glass (1 rebound, ↓) or as a roll man. He did manage 5 shot contests to offer some rim deterrence, but his overall footprint was minimal.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 3.6%
Net Rtg -37.5
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.5m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.3
Defense -4.2
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
6
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.7

Carter Bryant maximized his limited 7 minutes of run by drilling both of his three-point attempts, providing a quick +6.0 Offense credit. Beyond the spot-up shooting, however, he recorded zero rebounds (↓) or assists (↓), functioning purely as a fleeting floor-spacer.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +37.9
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.7m
Scoring +6.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.1

Harrison Barnes was a complete non-factor offensively, failing to attempt a single shot in his brief 6-minute cameo. He chipped in slightly on the other end with a steal (↑) and a deflection, yielding a +2.6 Defense credit, but was otherwise a ghost.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +33.3
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.2m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0