SAC

2025-26 Season

DYLAN CARDWELL

Sacramento Kings | Center | 6-10
Dylan Cardwell
5.4PPG
7.5RPG
1.4APG
20.6MPG
-1.0 Impact

Cardwell produces at an below average rate for a 21-minute workload. Defensive impact (-1.3/game) is a concern.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-1.0
Scoring +4.5
Points Scored 5.4 PPG = +5.4
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -1.6
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.7
Creation +0.5
Assists & Self-Creation 1.4 AST/g + self-creation = +0.5
Turnovers -2.1
Turnovers 0.9/g (live + dead blend) = -2.1
Defense -1.3
Steals 0.7/g = +1.6
Blocks 1.5/g = +1.4
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -4.3
Hustle & Effort +8.5
Rebounds 7.5 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +5.9
Contested Shots 5.9/g = +1.2
Deflections 1.1/g = +0.7
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.4/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 1.7/g = +0.5
Raw Impact +10.1
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.1
Net Impact
-1.0
34th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 19th
5.4 PPG
Efficiency 51th
59.2% TS
Playmaking 48th
1.4 APG
Rebounding 70th
7.5 RPG
Defense 31th
+5.0/g
Hustle 54th
+17.8/g
Creation 35th
+1.94/g
Shot Making 27th
+2.80/g
TO Discipline 75th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Dylan Cardwell’s opening stretch to the 2025-26 campaign was defined by a maddening search for a consistent role, oscillating wildly between empty minutes and gritty bench production. His early appearances were disastrous, bottoming out on 10/26 vs LAL with a dismal -15.3 Impact score. He managed zero points and just three rebounds in 13 minutes, offering absolutely no hustle or defensive resistance to justify his floor time. Yet, he found redemption against that exact same squad later in the winter, posting a stellar +8.5 Impact on 12/29 vs LAL. He only scored 7 points that night, but his positive value stemmed entirely from relentless defensive effort and securing seven crucial rebounds off the glass. Unfortunately, raw counting stats often masked his hidden costs, which became glaringly obvious on 01/12 vs HOU. Despite grabbing 11 boards and scoring a season-high 9 points, Cardwell recorded a -2.0 Impact because his atrocious shot selection—bricking seven of his 11 field goal attempts—constantly derailed the offense. To survive in this league, he must learn to embrace the dirty work and completely abandon his offensive ambitions.

Dylan Cardwell spent this stretch establishing himself as the ultimate low-maintenance, high-motor rotational bruiser. He rarely demands the ball. Yet, he routinely tilts games simply by controlling the glass. Take his outing on 01/21 vs MIA as the perfect example. Cardwell managed a mere four points, but his relentless effort to vacuum up 12 rebounds earned him a stellar +6.9 impact score. When given extended minutes, that hustle translates into sheer dominance, like when he battered defenders for 14 points and 14 rebounds to post a massive +20.8 impact on 02/06 vs LAC. The glaring flaw in this hyper-specialized role is that his value evaporates completely if the rebounding dries up. During a brief, invisible shift on 01/29 vs PHI, he failed to attempt a single shot and grabbed just four rebounds, suffering a brutal -17.1 impact score as a result.

Dylan Cardwell spent most of this stretch as a walking liability off the bench before suddenly flipping a switch into a highly efficient rotational big in April. Even when he hit the glass hard, his hidden costs were staggering early on. Take his performance on 03/24 vs CHA, where he pulled down 11 rebounds but still dragged his team down to a dismal -6.1 impact score due to poor defensive rotations and empty offensive possessions. The absolute nadir arrived on 04/01 vs TOR, where he looked entirely lost on the floor, committing unseen errors and bleeding points to the tune of a catastrophic -12.2 impact score in just 14 minutes. Just when his rotation spot seemed completely doomed, Cardwell finally found his rhythm. He exploded for a near-perfect 7-for-8 shooting night on 04/05 vs LAC, pairing 15 points and eight rebounds with aggressive interior defense to post a stellar +7.2 impact. He followed that up with flawless 4-for-4 shooting and relentless hustle on 04/07 vs GSW, generating a +6.4 impact score and finally justifying his minutes.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Cardwell's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~4 points per game.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 71% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Defensive difference-maker. Cardwell consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 5 games. Longest cold streak: 7 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 51 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

I. Stewart 41.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
D. Clingan 39.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 6
J. Allen 37.4 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 10
R. Williams III 35.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 9
M. Robinson 33.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
B. Lopez 33.1 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 6
D. Ayton 32.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Sengun 30.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 6
J. Duren 29.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Towns 29.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. Clingan 46.6 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 9
J. Allen 41.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
M. Robinson 41.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
R. Williams III 34.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Ayton 34.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 6
J. Duren 31.5 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 7
I. Stewart 29.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 7
A. Sengun 28.1 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 11
B. Lopez 27.4 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
Z. Williamson 24.3 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

44
Games
5.4
PPG
7.5
RPG
1.4
APG
0.7
SPG
1.5
BPG
58.7
FG%
50.0
3P%
51.0
FT%
20.6
MPG

GAME LOG

44 games played