SAC

2025-26 Season

DAEQWON PLOWDEN

Sacramento Kings | Guard-Forward | 6-4
Daeqwon Plowden
10.8PPG
3.0RPG
1.3APG
26.4MPG
-1.3 Impact

Plowden produces at an below average rate for a 26-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-1.3
Scoring +9.2
Points Scored 10.8 PPG = +10.8
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -4.0
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.4
Creation +0.6
Assists & Self-Creation 1.3 AST/g + self-creation = +0.6
Turnovers -1.9
Turnovers 0.8/g (live + dead blend) = -1.9
Defense -0.7
Steals 0.7/g = +1.6
Blocks 0.2/g = +0.2
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.5
Hustle & Effort +2.4
Rebounds 3.0 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.6
Contested Shots 2.8/g = +0.6
Deflections 1.3/g = +0.9
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.1
Loose Balls 0.2/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.2/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +9.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.9
Net Impact
-1.3
53th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 59th
10.8 PPG
Efficiency 51th
54.7% TS
Playmaking 17th
1.3 APG
Rebounding 54th
3.0 RPG
Defense 8th
+4.1/g
Hustle 68th
+10.5/g
Creation 23th
+1.89/g
Shot Making 51th
+6.73/g
TO Discipline 85th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Daeqwon Plowden's first eleven games of the 2025-26 campaign were defined by a brutal offensive slump that kept his overall impact deeply in the red. When you log 24 minutes and fail to score a single point, as he did on 02/01 vs WAS, the math is unforgiving. His abysmal -10.0 impact score that night was a direct result of empty offensive possessions and an 0-for-3 shooting night that killed his team's spacing. He finally found a rhythm during a rare spot start on 02/07 vs CLE. Playing a grueling 40 minutes, Plowden generated a +2.9 impact by pouring in 16 points, grabbing six rebounds, and dishing four assists to keep the offense moving. Yet, that momentum vanished immediately on 02/09 vs NOP. Despite logging 28 minutes, he dragged his team down with a disastrous -9.3 impact because of terrible shot selection, bricking six of his seven three-point attempts. Until he stops settling for bad perimeter looks, his minutes will continue to hurt more than they help.

Daeqwon Plowden's midseason run was defined by maddening, whiplash-inducing volatility. He opened this stretch on 02/26 vs DAL by playing a flawless offensive game, pouring in 19 points on perfect 7-for-7 shooting to generate a massive +12.6 Impact score. But that blistering touch vanished almost instantly. Just days later on 03/01 vs LAL, he threw up a total brickfest, missing all six of his field goal attempts to drag his Impact down to a dismal -10.4. This feast-or-famine approach frequently hurt his team, most glaringly on 03/15 vs UTA. Despite reaching double figures with 10 points in that contest, Plowden hijacked the offense by chucking up 11 three-pointers and hitting just two of them. That kind of reckless volume killed possessions and saddled him with a brutal -11.0 Impact score, revealing the hidden costs of a bench scorer who refuses to stop shooting when cold.

Daeqwon Plowden’s late-season stretch was defined by a jarring identity crisis as he toggled wildly between lethal bench sparkplug and overwhelmed starter. Operating as a reserve on 03/26 vs ORL, he torched the nets for 23 points on 6-of-10 shooting from beyond the arc. That blistering perimeter efficiency generated a robust +12.2 Impact score despite him logging zero assists. Yet, a promotion to the first five just three days later yielded disastrous results. During the 03/29 vs BKN matchup, Plowden forced terrible looks and bricked all seven of his three-point attempts, dragging his Impact down to a dismal -17.7 as his poor shot selection actively harmed the offense. He eventually found his footing in the opening lineup during the 04/10 vs GSW contest. Racking up 20 points and a season-high 9 rebounds, he earned a massive +17.0 Impact score because he finally supplemented his scoring with genuine grit on the glass.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Plowden's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~7 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 54% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive impact is minimal for a 26-minute player. Not generating enough contests, rim protection, or forced turnovers to move the needle.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -3.9, second-half: +1.3. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 34 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

S. Bey 41.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
C. White 36.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 8
J. Fears 28.1 poss
FG% 14.3%
3P% 16.7%
PPP 0.11
PTS 3
J. Giddey 21.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 3
V. Edgecombe 21.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Harden 20.8 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 6
D. Mitchell 20.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 3
D. Bane 20.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 3
L. Kennard 19.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
N. Marshall 19.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.52
PTS 10

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

S. Bey 35.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 9
V. Edgecombe 32.8 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 11
C. White 32.7 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 12
B. Mathurin 30.8 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3
D. Bane 26.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 8
J. Fears 25.9 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 9
B. Sensabaugh 24.1 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 8
J. Harden 23.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.43
PTS 10
K. Leonard 20.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.48
PTS 10
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 8

SEASON STATS

32
Games
10.8
PPG
3.0
RPG
1.3
APG
0.7
SPG
0.2
BPG
43.0
FG%
33.3
3P%
85.7
FT%
26.4
MPG

GAME LOG

32 games played