SAC

2025-26 Season

DAEQWON PLOWDEN

Sacramento Kings | Guard-Forward | 6-4
Daeqwon Plowden
10.7 PPG
3.0 RPG
1.1 APG
25.8 MPG
-2.9 Impact

Plowden produces at an below average rate for a 26-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-2.9
Scoring +6.4
Points 10.7 PPG × +1.00 = +10.7
Missed 2PT 1.1/g × -0.78 = -0.9
Missed 3PT 3.7/g × -0.87 = -3.2
Missed FT 0.2/g × -1.00 = -0.2
Creation +1.6
Assists 1.1/g × +0.50 = +0.6
Off. Rebounds 0.8/g × +1.26 = +1.0
Turnovers -1.4
Turnovers 0.7/g × -1.95 = -1.4
Defense +0.5
Steals 0.7/g × +2.30 = +1.6
Blocks 0.1/g × +0.90 = +0.1
Def. Rebounds 2.3/g × +0.30 = +0.7
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.4
Contested Shots 3.3/g × +0.20 = +0.7
Deflections 1.6/g × +0.65 = +1.0
Loose Balls 0.3/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.2/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.1/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.4
Raw Impact +9.5
Baseline (game-average expected) −12.4
Net Impact
-2.9
25th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 57th
10.7 PPG
Efficiency 52th
55.0% TS
Playmaking 12th
1.1 APG
Rebounding 54th
3.0 RPG
Rim Protection 21th
0.09/min
Hustle 34th
0.09/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 93th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Daeqwon Plowden's early 2025-26 campaign was defined by maddening inconsistency and brutal perimeter shooting slumps. He occasionally teased his ceiling as a flawless offensive weapon, putting up a +9.1 impact score on 02/26 vs DAL by hitting all seven of his field goal attempts for 19 points. Yet, even when he found the bottom of the net, hidden costs frequently dragged down his overall value. During a spot start on 02/07 vs CLE, Plowden poured in 16 points but still registered a -4.2 impact because his poor defensive awareness and costly rotations gave those points right back to the opposition. When his shot abandoned him entirely, he became an active liability. On 03/15 vs UTA, he stubbornly launched contested looks to finish 2-for-11 from beyond the arc, cratering his value to a -7.9 impact score. Unless he stops settling for bad jumpers and tightens up his defensive focus, this erratic swing between perfect nights and total vanishing acts will keep him glued to the bench.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Plowden has posted negative impact in 78% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 62% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Plowden locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -3.8, second-half: -2.1. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 3 games. Longest cold streak: 9 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 34 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

S. Bey 41.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
C. White 36.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 8
J. Fears 28.1 poss
FG% 14.3%
3P% 16.7%
PPP 0.11
PTS 3
J. Giddey 21.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 3
V. Edgecombe 21.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Harden 20.8 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 6
D. Mitchell 20.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 3
D. Bane 20.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 3
L. Kennard 19.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
N. Marshall 19.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.52
PTS 10

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

S. Bey 35.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 9
V. Edgecombe 32.8 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 11
C. White 32.7 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 12
B. Mathurin 30.8 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3
D. Bane 26.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 8
J. Fears 25.9 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 9
B. Sensabaugh 24.1 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 8
J. Harden 23.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.43
PTS 10
K. Leonard 20.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.48
PTS 10
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 8

SEASON STATS

27
Games
10.7
PPG
3.0
RPG
1.1
APG
0.7
SPG
0.1
BPG
43.9
FG%
34.4
3P%
85.0
FT%
25.8
MPG

GAME LOG

27 games played