Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
MIA lead MEM lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
MEM 2P — 3P —
MIA 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 190 attempts

MEM MEM Shot-making Δ

Jackson Open 11/17 +2.4
Jerome Hard 6/16 -1.1
Pippen Jr. 7/15 +0.7
Wells 10/13 +7.9
Clayton Jr. 4/11 -4.3
Mashack Hard 0/6 -6.2
Spencer Hard 0/5 -4.6
Small 3/4 +3.5
Prosper 3/4 +2.2
Hendricks Hard 1/4 -0.8

MIA MIA Shot-making Δ

Powell 10/16 +3.8
Herro 5/15 -4.6
Jaquez Jr. Open 5/12 -4.5
Wiggins Open 9/10 +9.1
Ware Open 5/9 -0.6
Adebayo 4/7 +0.3
Larsson 3/7 -1.6
Jakučionis 4/6 +3.0
Smith Open 1/4 -3.1
Gardner 2/3 +1.4
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
MEM
MIA
45/95 Field Goals 49/95
47.4% Field Goal % 51.6%
15/44 3-Pointers 13/36
34.1% 3-Point % 36.1%
15/22 Free Throws 25/33
68.2% Free Throw % 75.8%
57.3% True Shooting % 62.1%
49 Total Rebounds 64
9 Offensive 17
26 Defensive 40
31 Assists 36
2.38 Assist/TO Ratio 2.00
13 Turnovers 18
14 Steals 8
7 Blocks 5
22 Fouls 21
54 Points in Paint 70
23 Fast Break Pts 25
30 Points off TOs 21
14 Second Chance Pts 18
56 Bench Points 48
1 Largest Lead 24
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Andrew Wiggins
28 PTS · 7 REB · 3 AST · 28.9 MIN
+32.34
2
GG Jackson
28 PTS · 9 REB · 2 AST · 25.6 MIN
+23.9
3
Jaylen Wells
25 PTS · 2 REB · 2 AST · 27.1 MIN
+22.52
4
Norman Powell
25 PTS · 2 REB · 6 AST · 26.8 MIN
+18.55
5
Kel'el Ware
11 PTS · 15 REB · 0 AST · 18.7 MIN
+18.43
6
Olivier-Maxence Prosper
9 PTS · 3 REB · 4 AST · 25.8 MIN
+17.74
7
Scotty Pippen Jr.
18 PTS · 3 REB · 6 AST · 20.6 MIN
+15.1
8
Ty Jerome
17 PTS · 6 REB · 4 AST · 22.4 MIN
+14.6
9
Javon Small
10 PTS · 1 REB · 1 AST · 25.6 MIN
+14.02
10
Bam Adebayo
13 PTS · 6 REB · 5 AST · 26.9 MIN
+13.75
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:00 TEAM offensive REBOUND 120–136
Q4 0:00 K. Johnson BLOCK (1 BLK) 120–136
Q4 0:00 MISS G. Jackson 26' pullup 3PT - blocked 120–136
Q4 0:05 TEAM defensive REBOUND 120–136
Q4 0:06 MISS T. Keels 28' 3PT 120–136
Q4 0:21 G. Jackson Free Throw 2 of 2 (28 PTS) 120–136
Q4 0:21 G. Jackson Free Throw 1 of 2 (27 PTS) 119–136
Q4 0:21 K. Jakučionis personal FOUL (4 PF) (Jackson 2 FT) 118–136
Q4 0:21 G. Jackson REBOUND (Off:1 Def:8) 118–136
Q4 0:23 G. Jackson BLOCK (1 BLK) 118–136
Q4 0:23 MISS K. Johnson driving Layup - blocked 118–136
Q4 0:40 T. Hendricks Free Throw 2 of 2 (4 PTS) 118–136
Q4 0:40 TEAM offensive REBOUND 117–136
Q4 0:40 MISS T. Hendricks Free Throw 1 of 2 117–136
Q4 0:40 K. Johnson shooting personal FOUL (1 PF) (Hendricks 2 FT) 117–136

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

MIA Miami Heat
S Pelle Larsson 35.0m
10
pts
1
reb
5
ast
Impact
-9.9

A sudden freeze from the perimeter snapped his streak of hyper-efficient shooting nights, dragging his offensive impact into the red. He salvaged some value by crashing the glass and generating elite hustle metrics (+7.0), but the missed outside looks cramped the floor.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 51.9%
USG% 15.6%
Net Rtg +18.2
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.0m
Scoring +5.8
Creation +3.1
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.6
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 4
S Andrew Wiggins 28.9m
28
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
+30.2

Delivered an absolute masterclass in shot selection, punishing late closeouts with flawless perimeter execution. This offensive eruption more than doubled his recent output, driving a massive positive swing whenever he was on the floor.

Shooting
FG 9/10 (90.0%)
3PT 4/4 (100.0%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 110.8%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg +36.2
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.9m
Scoring +27.2
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +5.4
Hustle +7.0
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 87.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Bam Adebayo 26.9m
13
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
+6.5

Dialed back his offensive volume significantly, opting for high-percentage looks rather than forcing action in the paint. The resulting efficiency bump kept him in the positive, supported by his usual foundational defensive anchoring.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 70.7%
USG% 14.9%
Net Rtg +48.4
+/- +27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.9m
Scoring +10.1
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +5.7
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Norman Powell 26.8m
25
pts
2
reb
6
ast
Impact
+14.0

Slashed through defensive gaps with ruthless efficiency to build on a strong recent scoring trend. His surprisingly robust defensive metrics (+6.7) elevated this from a simple scoring binge to a highly impactful two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 10/16 (62.5%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 2/7 (28.6%)
Advanced
TS% 65.5%
USG% 29.0%
Net Rtg +30.9
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.8m
Scoring +17.6
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +6.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +4.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
12
pts
3
reb
5
ast
Impact
-5.4

Found a sudden offensive rhythm that doubled his usual scoring output, showing great patience in his shot selection. However, defensive lapses and poor rotational awareness (-1.4) ultimately washed away his scoring contributions.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 87.2%
USG% 14.8%
Net Rtg +19.4
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.9m
Scoring +10.6
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +0.9
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Tyler Herro 22.9m
14
pts
5
reb
6
ast
Impact
-3.0

Clanked his way through a rough shooting night, settling for heavily contested jumpers rather than attacking the paint. The sheer volume of wasted offensive possessions severely undercut his overall value despite decent playmaking efforts.

Shooting
FG 5/15 (33.3%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 42.9%
USG% 31.7%
Net Rtg +17.2
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.9m
Scoring +7.2
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +6.3
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
12
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+2.4

Forced too many contested looks in the midrange, resulting in a noticeable dip from his usual offensive efficiency. Slight defensive miscommunications (-0.5) further dragged his impact score below baseline.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 46.6%
USG% 23.0%
Net Rtg +13.7
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.6m
Scoring +6.4
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +6.3
Defense -0.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Dru Smith 21.8m
4
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.6

Struggled to convert his offensive looks, continuing a brutal stretch of shooting inefficiency. He managed to stay near neutral by flying around defensively (+4.0) and generating extra possessions through sheer hustle.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.0%
USG% 10.3%
Net Rtg -0.1
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.8m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +7.6
Defense +1.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 26.7%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 1
Kel'el Ware 18.7m
11
pts
15
reb
0
ast
Impact
+17.4

Completely owned the glass, using his length to generate second-chance opportunities and end opponent possessions. His rim protection (+6.3) paired beautifully with efficient interior finishing to anchor the second unit.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 61.1%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg -2.2
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.7m
Scoring +7.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +16.1
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 27.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-5.8

Maximized a brief rotational stint by executing perfectly within the flow of the offense. His quick decision-making and sturdy defensive positioning (+2.0) provided a reliable spark off the bench.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +24.1
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.3m
Scoring +4.2
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +1.9
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.4

Tossed up a pair of empty possessions during a very short stint on the floor. Lacked the defensive disruption or hustle needed to offset the missed shots.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -96.4
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.5m
Scoring -1.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.6

Made the most of his garbage-time minutes by crashing the glass and executing defensive assignments (+2.3). His energetic rotations kept his brief stint firmly in the positive despite a couple of missed bunnies.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 50.0%
Net Rtg -96.4
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.5m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +3.8
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-14.6

Barely registered an impact during a fleeting appearance, continuing a prolonged shooting slump. Failed to generate any defensive resistance or hustle stats to justify extended minutes.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg -96.4
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.5m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
MEM Memphis Grizzlies
S Jaylen Wells 27.1m
25
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+14.5

An unexpected offensive explosion drove his massive positive impact, nearly quadrupling his recent scoring average on highly efficient shot selection. His perimeter accuracy opened up driving lanes, while steady defensive positioning (+3.8) ensured he didn't give those points back on the other end.

Shooting
FG 10/13 (76.9%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 90.1%
USG% 24.6%
Net Rtg -11.4
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.1m
Scoring +22.6
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +5.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
9
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+8.2

Took a significant step back in scoring volume compared to his recent hot streak, but maximized his limited touches with near-perfect execution. The real story was his elite defensive impact (+8.7) and high-motor hustle plays, proving he can dictate a game's flow without dominating the ball.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 92.2%
USG% 9.8%
Net Rtg -14.1
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.8m
Scoring +8.2
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +3.8
Defense +7.9
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 1
9
pts
4
reb
6
ast
Impact
-17.9

Poor shot selection from beyond the arc torpedoed his offensive efficiency and stalled out several possessions. His negative defensive impact compounded the erratic shooting, making him a net-negative despite showing some flashes as a secondary playmaker.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 40.9%
USG% 20.6%
Net Rtg +0.3
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.5m
Scoring +3.7
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +1.2
Defense -8.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 53.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
4
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.7

Continued his prolonged shooting slump, struggling to find any offensive rhythm or spacing value. While he brought decent energy and defensive resistance, his inability to punish defensive rotations severely dragged down his overall offensive rating.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/4 (25.0%)
Advanced
TS% 34.7%
USG% 11.5%
Net Rtg -1.6
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.3m
Scoring +0.7
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
S Ty Jerome 22.4m
17
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
+11.2

Despite struggling to find his rhythm from the floor, his overall value stayed firmly in the green thanks to excellent defensive engagement (+6.3). He managed the offense well enough to compensate for the clunky shooting, relying on disruptive perimeter defense to generate value.

Shooting
FG 6/16 (37.5%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.4%
USG% 35.8%
Net Rtg -11.6
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.4m
Scoring +9.8
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +4.4
Hustle +7.6
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
Javon Small 25.6m
10
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.1

Operated as a highly efficient stabilizing force on low volume, taking only what the defense gave him. His positive defensive metrics (+5.2) kept his floor high, even as he deferred more scoring responsibility than usual.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 102.5%
USG% 7.1%
Net Rtg -19.0
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.6m
Scoring +9.4
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
GG Jackson 25.6m
28
pts
9
reb
2
ast
Impact
+20.1

Completely dominated the interior matchups, converting high-percentage looks to shatter his recent scoring averages. His aggressive downhill attacks were paired with stifling defensive rotations (+7.1), resulting in a dominant two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 11/17 (64.7%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 5/8 (62.5%)
Advanced
TS% 68.2%
USG% 31.0%
Net Rtg -23.4
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.6m
Scoring +21.5
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +4.9
Hustle +4.6
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
0
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-14.3

A complete offensive disappearing act cratered his overall impact, failing to convert a single field goal attempt. Although he tried to compensate with active hustle (+3.0), the empty offensive possessions consistently killed the team's momentum.

Shooting
FG 0/6 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 9.5%
Net Rtg -22.1
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.2m
Scoring -4.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +3.8
Defense -2.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
Cam Spencer 20.9m
0
pts
2
reb
5
ast
Impact
-13.9

Blanked entirely from the scoring column, extending a worrying trend of perimeter inefficiency. His playmaking flashes couldn't salvage a disastrous shooting night that allowed defenders to completely sag off him.

Shooting
FG 0/5 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 8.5%
Net Rtg -23.2
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.9m
Scoring -3.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
18
pts
3
reb
6
ast
Impact
+5.8

Generated consistent rim pressure to offset a streaky shooting night, keeping the offense humming. His point-of-attack defense (+6.0) was the real difference-maker, disrupting opposing guards and creating transition opportunities.

Shooting
FG 7/15 (46.7%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.7%
USG% 35.8%
Net Rtg -45.6
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.6m
Scoring +11.3
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +4.9
Hustle +2.8
Defense +3.4
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 72.7%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 3