Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
DAL lead MEM lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
MEM 2P — 3P —
DAL 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 181 attempts

MEM MEM Shot-making Δ

Spencer Hard 9/16 +6.5
Pippen Jr. 7/12 +3.1
Prosper 7/10 +4.4
Wells Hard 4/10 0.0
Clayton Jr. Hard 3/10 -3.7
Rupert 2/8 -3.5
Hendricks 5/7 +3.2
Jackson Open 5/7 +1.9
Mashack 3/7 -1.9
Small Hard 2/6 -0.4

DAL DAL Shot-making Δ

Williams 5/14 -3.3
Johnson 3/13 -7.7
Christie Hard 5/12 -1.0
Kelly 3/11 -4.4
Gafford Open 7/8 +4.2
Middleton Hard 3/8 -1.2
Jones Hard 2/7 -0.5
Marshall Hard 2/6 -1.4
Cisse Open 4/5 +1.2
Powell Open 3/4 +1.7
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
MEM
DAL
47/93 Field Goals 37/88
50.5% Field Goal % 42.0%
12/32 3-Pointers 9/32
37.5% 3-Point % 28.1%
18/21 Free Throws 22/33
85.7% Free Throw % 66.7%
60.6% True Shooting % 51.2%
48 Total Rebounds 64
10 Offensive 13
33 Defensive 33
29 Assists 24
2.64 Assist/TO Ratio 1.14
11 Turnovers 20
13 Steals 4
7 Blocks 4
26 Fouls 13
58 Points in Paint 48
32 Fast Break Pts 9
36 Points off TOs 15
18 Second Chance Pts 24
60 Bench Points 48
34 Largest Lead 0
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Cam Spencer
25 PTS · 2 REB · 3 AST · 25.0 MIN
+24.64
2
Olivier-Maxence Prosper
16 PTS · 10 REB · 1 AST · 24.8 MIN
+21.32
3
Scotty Pippen Jr.
15 PTS · 2 REB · 3 AST · 21.6 MIN
+14.65
4
Dwight Powell
13 PTS · 11 REB · 1 AST · 22.6 MIN
+12.94
5
Daniel Gafford
14 PTS · 5 REB · 0 AST · 20.1 MIN
+12.79
6
Jaylen Wells
12 PTS · 4 REB · 3 AST · 19.9 MIN
+12.44
7
GG Jackson
12 PTS · 3 REB · 4 AST · 24.4 MIN
+10.63
8
Javon Small
9 PTS · 4 REB · 5 AST · 25.8 MIN
+9.76
9
Taylor Hendricks
11 PTS · 8 REB · 2 AST · 23.6 MIN
+9.57
10
Brandon Williams
16 PTS · 8 REB · 4 AST · 26.4 MIN
+8.35
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:05 T. Hendricks REBOUND (Off:2 Def:6) 124–105
Q4 0:08 MISS M. Kelly running 3PT 124–105
Q4 0:13 D. Powell REBOUND (Off:5 Def:6) 124–105
Q4 0:17 MISS T. Hendricks 24' 3PT 124–105
Q4 0:38 M. Cisse putback Layup (8 PTS) 124–105
Q4 0:38 M. Cisse REBOUND (Off:4 Def:4) 124–103
Q4 0:39 T. Hendricks BLOCK (2 BLK) 124–103
Q4 0:39 MISS M. Cisse Layup - blocked 124–103
Q4 0:41 M. Cisse REBOUND (Off:3 Def:4) 124–103
Q4 0:42 MISS A. Johnson driving finger roll Layup 124–103
Q4 0:54 D. Powell REBOUND (Off:5 Def:5) 124–103
Q4 0:56 MISS C. Spencer 26' pullup 3PT 124–103
Q4 1:01 T. Jones 3PT (6 PTS) (M. Kelly 4 AST) 124–103
Q4 1:22 C. Spencer 20' Jump Shot (25 PTS) (J. Small 5 AST) 124–100
Q4 1:33 M. Kelly Free Throw 1 of 1 (9 PTS) 122–100

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Why this game is worth arguing about

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

DAL Dallas Mavericks
S Max Christie 29.0m
13
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-7.7

Icy perimeter shooting severely handicapped the offense during his lengthy shifts. Opponents sagged off him to clog the driving lanes, turning his missed spot-up opportunities into a glaring negative for the unit's spacing.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.5%
USG% 23.4%
Net Rtg -30.8
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.0m
Scoring +7.6
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +2.8
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -11.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 5
16
pts
8
reb
4
ast
Impact
+1.4

Forcing the issue against set defenses resulted in a barrage of clanked shots that dragged his impact into the red. His aggressive rebounding from the guard spot mitigated some of the damage, but the sheer volume of wasted offensive possessions was tough to ignore.

Shooting
FG 5/14 (35.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 49.4%
USG% 26.9%
Net Rtg -28.8
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.4m
Scoring +8.4
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +2.4
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Naji Marshall 23.6m
4
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-11.0

A jarring offensive disappearance torpedoed his net rating, as he failed to replicate his recent high-scoring form. He tried to compensate with exceptional hustle and physical wing defense, but the lack of scoring punch left the lineup starved for spacing.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 14.8%
Net Rtg -49.5
+/- -24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.6m
Scoring +1.3
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +0.6
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 3
S Daniel Gafford 20.1m
14
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
+4.5

Utter dominance in the restricted area anchored a massive positive impact score. He served as an elite lob threat on offense while simultaneously walling off the paint, continuing a brilliant stretch of hyper-efficient interior play.

Shooting
FG 7/8 (87.5%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 82.9%
USG% 19.6%
Net Rtg -45.2
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.1m
Scoring +12.6
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +4.4
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 2
S Khris Middleton 19.3m
10
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-4.7

Settling for contested midrange pull-ups limited his overall effectiveness despite a slight uptick in his recent scoring output. The lack of rim pressure and defensive playmaking resulted in a mildly negative footprint on the floor.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 49.0%
USG% 23.4%
Net Rtg -41.1
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.3m
Scoring +6.0
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
AJ Johnson 33.7m
12
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
-6.9

An absolute green light from the perimeter backfired spectacularly, yielding a horrific shooting percentage that killed offensive momentum. While his raw scoring numbers looked like a breakout, the sheer number of empty, forced jumpers resulted in the worst net impact on the roster.

Shooting
FG 3/13 (23.1%)
3PT 1/8 (12.5%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 38.4%
USG% 19.4%
Net Rtg -6.3
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.7m
Scoring +3.5
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 36.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Miles Kelly 31.0m
9
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
-5.0

Trigger-happy tendencies from beyond the arc punished the offense, as he repeatedly bailed out the defense with early-clock misfires. He showed some resistance on the defensive end, but the steady stream of missed triples prevented the team from establishing any rhythm.

Shooting
FG 3/11 (27.3%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 39.3%
USG% 15.5%
Net Rtg -9.3
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.0m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +2.5
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
13
pts
11
reb
1
ast
Impact
+8.0

Masterful work as a roll man and offensive rebounder fueled a massive spike in his typical production. He generated extra possessions through sheer positioning and finished his limited touches flawlessly to boost the team's overall efficiency.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 6/7 (85.7%)
Advanced
TS% 91.8%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +4.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.6m
Scoring +11.5
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +14.0
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -6.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Tyus Jones 21.6m
6
pts
0
reb
4
ast
Impact
-5.0

Uncharacteristic struggles to break down the primary point of attack left the offense looking stagnant during his shifts. Even though he managed to knock down a couple of perimeter looks to break a recent slump, his inability to consistently collapse the defense resulted in a negative overall rating.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 42.9%
USG% 11.7%
Net Rtg -4.4
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.6m
Scoring +2.4
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Moussa Cisse 12.8m
8
pts
8
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.9

Excellent rim-running and decisive finishing in the dunker spot provided a quick, efficient spark off the bench. He maximized his short stint by staying strictly within his role, converting dump-offs and avoiding costly mistakes.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/6 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.4%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg +28.1
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.8m
Scoring +4.1
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +7.2
Defense -2.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
MEM Memphis Grizzlies
S Javon Small 25.8m
9
pts
4
reb
5
ast
Impact
+0.9

Gritty point-of-attack defense and consistent hustle plays kept his impact in the green despite a rough shooting night. He compensated for his missed jumpers by fighting through screens and blowing up opponent dribble hand-offs.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.0%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg +21.9
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.8m
Scoring +6.2
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +4.1
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
16
pts
10
reb
1
ast
Impact
+14.1

An absolutely suffocating defensive performance drove a massive positive impact score. He completely neutralized his primary matchups on the perimeter while continuing a streak of highly efficient, opportunistic finishing on the other end.

Shooting
FG 7/10 (70.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 80.0%
USG% 17.7%
Net Rtg +28.6
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.8m
Scoring +13.8
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +3.0
Defense +5.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 1
S GG Jackson 24.4m
12
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+2.0

Exceptional shot discipline defined his minutes, generating a positive net rating despite a notable drop in his usual scoring volume. By refusing to force isolation looks, he maintained offensive flow and capitalized on high-percentage opportunities around the rim.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.1%
USG% 14.8%
Net Rtg +34.4
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.4m
Scoring +10.4
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.9
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 14.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
15
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
+6.1

Disruptive perimeter defense and decisive downhill penetration fueled a highly effective two-way showing. His ability to consistently break the paint collapsed the defense, while his active hands created transition opportunities.

Shooting
FG 7/12 (58.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 26.9%
Net Rtg +35.2
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.6m
Scoring +11.9
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +0.6
Defense +4.2
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 2
S Jaylen Wells 19.9m
12
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+3.3

A pronounced scoring surge well above his recent baseline anchored his positive overall impact. While his overall shooting efficiency was middling, his constant perimeter gravity opened up driving lanes for teammates. Defending the point of attack with active hands kept his overall rating firmly in the green.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 53.0%
USG% 20.8%
Net Rtg +38.3
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.9m
Scoring +7.3
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +3.1
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
11
pts
2
reb
5
ast
Impact
-6.8

Clunky shot selection and missed perimeter looks severely dragged down his overall rating. Although he showed flashes of competence on the defensive end, his inability to convert in isolation stalled multiple offensive possessions.

Shooting
FG 3/10 (30.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 5/7 (71.4%)
Advanced
TS% 42.0%
USG% 23.8%
Net Rtg +5.3
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.4m
Scoring +5.4
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
Rayan Rupert 25.2m
5
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-11.6

Errant jumpers and forced attempts in traffic cratered his offensive value during his shifts. While his length yielded a few nice hustle plays, the sheer volume of empty possessions he generated proved too costly to overcome.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 31.3%
USG% 15.8%
Net Rtg -1.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.2m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +3.4
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
Cam Spencer 25.0m
25
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
+21.8

A massive, out-of-nowhere offensive eruption completely tilted the game's momentum. His lethal perimeter shot-making punished drop coverages all night, generating a gargantuan box score impact that dwarfed his recent sluggish production.

Shooting
FG 9/16 (56.2%)
3PT 4/9 (44.4%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 72.2%
USG% 29.8%
Net Rtg +19.2
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.0m
Scoring +20.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +6.6
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
11
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.6

Capitalizing on easy dump-offs and putbacks allowed him to shatter his recent scoring slump with pristine efficiency. His vertical spacing and activity on the glass provided a steadying presence for the second unit.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 78.6%
USG% 16.4%
Net Rtg +4.2
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.6m
Scoring +9.5
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +10.2
Defense -1.5
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 2
8
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.1

Relentless energy on loose balls nearly salvaged a night marred by offensive hesitancy. He struggled to find a rhythm as a scorer, but his willingness to do the dirty work in the trenches kept his net impact hovering right around neutral.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.8%
USG% 14.5%
Net Rtg +3.9
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.2m
Scoring +5.4
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +2.8
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 10.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0