January 24, 2026
EXPLORE THE GAME
Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.
IND
2P —
3P —
OKC
2P —
3P —
IND
OKC
IND
PLAYER PERFORMANCE
Oklahoma City Thunder
Elite physical exertion and loose-ball recoveries (+9.0 hustle) could not mask an abysmal offensive showing. He short-circuited numerous possessions by forcing heavily contested perimeter shots, dragging his box score impact to a dismal -4.9. The sheer volume of wasted offensive trips anchored his overall rating at a staggering -13.9.
An unstoppable mid-range clinic dismantled the opposing defense, driving a gargantuan +39.7 box score impact. He consistently collapsed the paint with methodical drives, generating high-percentage looks at will while maintaining superb efficiency. This relentless offensive pressure, combined with solid positional defense, engineered a game-breaking +27.7 overall rating.
Completely hijacked the game through terrifying rim protection, posting a monstrous +11.9 defensive impact score. He paired this interior dominance with pristine shot selection, punishing late closeouts to nearly double his recent scoring average. This two-way masterclass dictated the terms of engagement all night, culminating in a dominant +20.3 net rating.
Tenacious point-of-attack defense (+4.8) and opportunistic spot-up shooting kept his impact firmly in the positive. He excelled at doing the dirty work, generating extra possessions through timely deflections and floor burns (+5.3 hustle). While his overall usage was low, his flawless execution of a 3-and-D role provided crucial stabilizing minutes.
A disastrous perimeter shooting performance completely neutralized his floor-spacing value. Compounding the offensive woes, he was routinely beaten off the dribble, leading to a damaging -1.8 defensive metric. The combination of clanked open looks and defensive bleeding resulted in a catastrophic -13.9 net impact.
Surging past his recent scoring slumps, he thrived by aggressively cutting to the basket and finishing through contact. His physical edge set the tone for the second unit, reflected in elite hustle (+5.0) and defensive (+5.6) metrics that suffocated opposing wings. This gritty, high-energy performance perfectly bridged the gap between the starters' shifts.
Extreme offensive passivity rendered him a liability, as he attempted a lone field goal in over 20 minutes of action. Opposing defenses completely ignored him on the perimeter, which clogged the driving lanes for his teammates and cratered the unit's spacing. Despite adequate positioning on defense, his refusal to look at the basket resulted in a punishing -13.1 net impact.
Maximized a brief rotational stint by deploying his length to disrupt passing lanes, earning a stellar +6.0 defensive impact score. He played strictly within the flow of the offense, taking only high-value shots to ensure maximum efficiency. His disciplined two-way execution provided a massive +8.3 jolt to the lineup in just 13 minutes.
Failed to establish interior leverage during his short time on the floor, getting pushed around on the block. While he managed a few positive hustle plays (+1.4), his inability to secure the paint or finish cleanly inside dragged his net rating down. He simply lacked the physicality required for this specific matchup.
Struggled to acclimate to the game's pace during a brief first-half cameo. He was caught out of position on multiple defensive rotations, leading to a swift hook from the coaching staff. The resulting -5.0 impact score reflects a stint defined entirely by missed assignments rather than positive accumulation.
Indiana Pacers
A high volume of missed mid-range attempts ultimately dragged his net impact into the negative (-1.4) despite a robust traditional stat line. He settled for contested isolation jumpers rather than attacking the rim, neutralizing his otherwise decent defensive metrics. The sheer number of empty offensive trips allowed the opponent to consistently leak out in transition.
Masterful orchestration of the pick-and-roll fueled a massive +22.8 box score impact. He consistently exploited defensive gaps, punishing under-screens with lethal perimeter accuracy to shatter his recent scoring averages. This pristine shot selection and offensive command drove a highly positive overall rating (+7.2) despite a relatively quiet defensive showing.
Defensive breakdowns at the point of attack (-1.0) completely erased the value of his highly efficient perimeter shooting. He struggled to navigate screens, frequently putting the backline in rotation and bleeding points on the other end. Consequently, his overall impact plummeted to -4.2 despite capitalizing on nearly all of his catch-and-shoot opportunities.
Offensive struggles severely limited his overall value, as he failed to convert on multiple perimeter looks. While his active hands and rotational awareness generated strong defensive (+3.0) and hustle (+5.7) metrics, the sheer volume of empty possessions kept him in the red. His inability to punish closeouts defined a frustrating outing.
Capitalizing on defensive mismatches, he continued a scorching streak of high-efficiency shooting to generate a massive positive box score impact. His shot selection was pristine, punishing drop coverage from deep while maintaining his recent hot hand. A reliable defensive floor (+2.8) ensured his offensive eruption translated to a solid positive net rating.
Exceptional rim deterrence and rotational awareness (+4.5 defensive impact) anchored a highly productive shift. Even with a barrage of missed trailing three-pointers, his relentless activity on the glass and loose-ball recoveries (+3.2 hustle) kept possessions alive. He fundamentally changed the geometry of the paint, driving a stellar +8.0 net rating.
Snapping a long streak of hyper-efficient shooting, he struggled to finish his signature paint floaters. However, his trademark defensive peskiness (+2.6) and relentless ball pressure salvaged his overall impact. By generating deflections and extending possessions (+4.2 hustle), he managed to stay slightly in the green (+0.9) despite the offensive dip.
Perimeter defensive lapses (-1.2) undermined a brief but highly efficient offensive stint. He was repeatedly targeted on switches during a rough second-quarter stretch, giving back whatever value he created from spotting up in the corners. The lack of secondary hustle plays left him with a negative overall footprint.
An absolute non-factor on the offensive end, he failed to register a single field goal attempt during his brief rotation. While he provided a modicum of rim protection (+1.9 defense), his inability to establish any interior gravity stalled the second unit's flow. This offensive invisibility resulted in a steep -4.4 overall impact rating.
Relegated to deep garbage time, he simply did not see enough floor time to impact the game in either direction. The slight negative rating (-1.2) stems entirely from being on the floor during a minor opponent run to close the quarter. He was essentially a cardio participant in this matchup.
