GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

HOU Houston Rockets
23
pts
9
reb
2
ast
Impact
+4.0

Assertive shot-making from the perimeter forced opposing bigs to step out, opening up the interior. His versatility in switching onto smaller guards late in the clock cemented a strong two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 7/14 (50.0%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 6/8 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.6%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +39.3
+/- +30
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.1m
Offense +12.2
Hustle +3.6
Defense +7.2
Raw total +23.0
Avg player in 35.1m -19.0
Impact +4.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
S Amen Thompson 34.0m
14
pts
7
reb
4
ast
Impact
0.0

Relentless rim pressure generated high-percentage looks, but a slew of offensive fouls and spacing issues wiped out those gains. A tendency to force drives into heavy traffic resulted in empty possessions, perfectly neutralizing his otherwise stellar box score production.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.5%
USG% 15.5%
Net Rtg +18.1
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.0m
Offense +14.7
Hustle +0.2
Defense +3.4
Raw total +18.3
Avg player in 34.0m -18.3
Impact 0.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Alperen Sengun 31.8m
15
pts
9
reb
10
ast
Impact
-1.4

Elite playmaking from the high post was ultimately undermined by costly live-ball turnovers that fueled opponent transition runs. Despite orchestrating the offense beautifully and anchoring the paint, giving the ball away negated his high-efficiency scoring.

Shooting
FG 7/11 (63.6%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/4 (25.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.8%
USG% 24.7%
Net Rtg +13.5
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.8m
Offense +6.8
Hustle +3.8
Defense +5.2
Raw total +15.8
Avg player in 31.8m -17.2
Impact -1.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 23
FGM Against 13
Opp FG% 56.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 6
S Kevin Durant 30.4m
25
pts
3
reb
6
ast
Impact
+16.8

Surgical precision in isolation situations completely dismantled the opposing defense. By consistently generating clean looks over smaller defenders and making sharp reads out of double teams, he dictated the entire flow of the game.

Shooting
FG 9/15 (60.0%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 72.7%
USG% 22.4%
Net Rtg +38.7
+/- +25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.4m
Offense +23.2
Hustle +2.1
Defense +8.0
Raw total +33.3
Avg player in 30.4m -16.5
Impact +16.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 0
S Reed Sheppard 24.9m
14
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
+4.5

Capitalized on defensive gravity by burying crucial weak-side triples. His relentless off-ball hustle and quick closeouts on the perimeter added significant hidden value beyond his shooting efficiency.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 70.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +39.4
+/- +23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.9m
Offense +9.0
Hustle +6.7
Defense +2.4
Raw total +18.1
Avg player in 24.9m -13.6
Impact +4.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 3
Tari Eason 24.5m
10
pts
10
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.9

Overcame a clunky offensive showing by wreaking havoc on the offensive glass and generating extra possessions. His high-motor closeouts and physical post defense ensured he remained a net positive despite the missed shots.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 48.4%
USG% 18.5%
Net Rtg +31.2
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.5m
Offense +5.0
Hustle +3.6
Defense +6.5
Raw total +15.1
Avg player in 24.5m -13.2
Impact +1.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
Josh Okogie 19.2m
2
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.1

Offensive stagnation and a lack of spacing gravity allowed defenders to cheat off him constantly. Even his typically disruptive point-of-attack defense couldn't compensate for the structural issues he caused on the other end.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 6.7%
Net Rtg -0.5
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.2m
Offense -0.7
Hustle +1.5
Defense +4.5
Raw total +5.3
Avg player in 19.2m -10.4
Impact -5.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
9
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-5.6

Hot perimeter shooting was entirely negated by poor defensive rotations that surrendered easy back-door cuts. Opponents consistently targeted him in isolation, turning his minutes into a significant net negative despite the scoring burst.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 23.7%
Net Rtg -9.4
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.2m
Offense +2.0
Hustle +0.4
Defense +0.8
Raw total +3.2
Avg player in 16.2m -8.8
Impact -5.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
Clint Capela 13.8m
3
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.0

Struggled to make an imprint against quicker frontcourt matchups that neutralized his lob-threat gravity. While he provided adequate drop coverage, his lack of offensive involvement limited his overall effectiveness.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/4 (25.0%)
Advanced
TS% 39.9%
USG% 13.5%
Net Rtg +25.8
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.8m
Offense +0.8
Hustle +1.4
Defense +4.2
Raw total +6.4
Avg player in 13.8m -7.4
Impact -1.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.9

Forced a couple of ill-advised drives into traffic during a disjointed stint with the second unit. Failed to establish any defensive presence, allowing the opposition to score freely during his minutes.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -51.9
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.9m
Offense +0.3
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total +0.3
Avg player in 5.9m -3.2
Impact -2.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Jeff Green 4.3m
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.7

Looked a step slow on defensive closeouts, giving up uncontested jumpers in limited action. A completely empty offensive shift meant he only detracted from the team's momentum.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg -33.3
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.3m
Offense -0.4
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total -0.4
Avg player in 4.3m -2.3
Impact -2.7
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
ATL Atlanta Hawks
S Jalen Johnson 31.9m
14
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-8.2

Inefficient perimeter shooting and poorly timed live-ball turnovers ultimately tanked his net rating despite solid defensive metrics. Even though he found moderate success attacking the rim, forcing contested jumpers early in the clock stalled the offense.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 58.3%
USG% 21.6%
Net Rtg -41.0
+/- -27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.9m
Offense +2.6
Hustle +2.3
Defense +4.1
Raw total +9.0
Avg player in 31.9m -17.2
Impact -8.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
21
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
+5.3

Continued his hot offensive streak by aggressively attacking closeouts and creating high-quality looks. His relentless off-ball movement forced defensive breakdowns, driving a massive positive box score contribution.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 8/9 (88.9%)
Advanced
TS% 65.8%
USG% 25.4%
Net Rtg -24.9
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.3m
Offense +13.8
Hustle +4.8
Defense +1.4
Raw total +20.0
Avg player in 27.3m -14.7
Impact +5.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S CJ McCollum 25.3m
17
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+8.9

Masterful pacing in the half-court offense fueled a highly efficient scoring night. He consistently punished drop coverage with his midrange pull-up, while surprisingly robust point-of-attack defense elevated his total impact.

Shooting
FG 7/11 (63.6%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 74.3%
USG% 23.7%
Net Rtg -27.8
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.3m
Offense +10.0
Hustle +5.0
Defense +7.7
Raw total +22.7
Avg player in 25.3m -13.8
Impact +8.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 43.8%
STL 1
BLK 3
TO 3
S Dyson Daniels 25.2m
3
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.3

A severe regression in scoring efficiency dragged down his overall value despite solid defensive metrics. Settling for contested looks early in the shot clock neutralized the positive impact of his perimeter ball pressure.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 25.5%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg -28.3
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.2m
Offense -2.2
Hustle +2.8
Defense +4.8
Raw total +5.4
Avg player in 25.2m -13.7
Impact -8.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
S Onyeka Okongwu 23.6m
6
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
-1.0

Finishing woes around the basket completely overshadowed a highly disruptive defensive performance. He anchored the paint well and generated deflections, but blowing several point-blank bunnies kept his overall impact slightly in the red.

Shooting
FG 2/9 (22.2%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 30.4%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg -14.0
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.6m
Offense +2.9
Hustle +3.0
Defense +5.9
Raw total +11.8
Avg player in 23.6m -12.8
Impact -1.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 0
Jock Landale 20.1m
6
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
+4.0

Elite positional defense and rim deterrence kept his overall impact firmly positive despite a rough shooting night. He made his living by setting bone-crushing screens and altering shots in the paint, compensating for the missed floaters.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 18.8%
Net Rtg -38.9
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.1m
Offense +3.5
Hustle +3.1
Defense +8.2
Raw total +14.8
Avg player in 20.1m -10.8
Impact +4.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 0
16
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+11.2

Flawless shot selection and lethal catch-and-shoot execution resulted in a massive spike in offensive efficiency. Capitalizing perfectly on defensive breakdowns, he provided a crucial scoring punch that completely swung the momentum.

Shooting
FG 6/8 (75.0%)
3PT 3/3 (100.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 94.8%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.0m
Offense +17.5
Hustle +1.7
Defense +2.2
Raw total +21.4
Avg player in 19.0m -10.2
Impact +11.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 1
2
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-7.3

A disastrous outing from three-point range destroyed his primary utility as a floor spacer. Opponents aggressively stunted off him, clogging driving lanes for teammates and sinking his overall on-court value.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 16.7%
USG% 15.0%
Net Rtg +5.7
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.2m
Offense -1.1
Hustle +1.5
Defense +2.2
Raw total +2.6
Avg player in 18.2m -9.9
Impact -7.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.1

Complete offensive invisibility created a 4-on-5 situation that severely hampered the team's spacing. While he showed flashes of weak-side rim protection, his inability to command any defensive attention proved too costly.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 4.9%
Net Rtg -43.6
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.1m
Offense -1.7
Hustle +3.0
Defense +2.4
Raw total +3.7
Avg player in 18.1m -9.8
Impact -6.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
Gabe Vincent 16.8m
6
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.6

Brick-laying from beyond the arc stalled out offensive possessions and negated his otherwise adequate on-ball defense. Failing to capitalize on wide-open spot-up opportunities allowed the opposition to safely ignore him on the perimeter.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 38.1%
USG% 19.5%
Net Rtg -18.9
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.8m
Offense +4.8
Hustle +0.2
Defense +1.5
Raw total +6.5
Avg player in 16.8m -9.1
Impact -2.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.7

Managed to stay afloat in limited minutes entirely through surprisingly disciplined team defense. Though his offensive volume was nonexistent, timely rotations and active hands in the passing lanes kept his impact slightly positive.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 19.0%
Net Rtg +48.4
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.2m
Offense -2.3
Hustle +1.9
Defense +5.5
Raw total +5.1
Avg player in 8.2m -4.4
Impact +0.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.2

Made the most of a brief cameo by executing his sole offensive touch flawlessly. Quick decision-making during a short stint ensured he didn't bleed value while the starters rested.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -14.3
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.3m
Offense +2.0
Hustle +0.7
Defense +0.3
Raw total +3.0
Avg player in 3.3m -1.8
Impact +1.2
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.9

A rushed, poor-quality shot attempt and defensive miscommunications marred his brief appearance. Failed to establish any rhythm, resulting in a quick negative swing during his shift.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg -16.7
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.0m
Offense -2.8
Hustle +0.2
Defense +0.3
Raw total -2.3
Avg player in 3.0m -1.6
Impact -3.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1