ATL

2025-26 Season

ASA NEWELL

Atlanta Hawks | Forward | 6-10
Asa Newell
5.0 PPG
2.0 RPG
0.5 APG
10.8 MPG
0.0 Impact

Newell produces at an average rate for a 11-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+0.0
Scoring +3.3
Points 5.0 PPG × +1.00 = +5.0
Missed 2PT 0.7/g × -0.78 = -0.5
Missed 3PT 1.0/g × -0.87 = -0.9
Missed FT 0.3/g × -1.00 = -0.3
Creation +0.8
Assists 0.5/g × +0.50 = +0.2
Off. Rebounds 0.5/g × +1.26 = +0.6
Turnovers -1.0
Turnovers 0.5/g × -1.95 = -1.0
Defense -0.3
Steals 0.4/g × +2.30 = +0.9
Blocks 0.3/g × +0.90 = +0.3
Def. Rebounds 1.5/g × +0.30 = +0.4
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.2
Contested Shots 2.9/g × +0.20 = +0.6
Deflections 0.4/g × +0.65 = +0.3
Loose Balls 0.2/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.5/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +4.0
Baseline (game-average expected) −4.0
Net Impact
+0.0
50th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 28th
6.4 PPG
Efficiency 47th
56.4% TS
Playmaking 8th
0.7 APG
Rebounding 16th
2.5 RPG
Rim Protection 46th
0.14/min
Hustle 45th
0.10/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 42th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Asa Newell’s early-season stretch was a volatile tightrope walk between serving as an essential two-way sparkplug and an outright defensive liability off the bench. When fully engaged, he completely warped games. He peaked on 11/08 vs LAL, where elite shot selection and suffocating interior defense fueled a massive +12.4 impact score alongside 17 points. He even found ways to be useful when his shot disappeared entirely. During a scoreless seven-minute shift on 11/25 vs WAS, excellent defensive positioning salvaged a +0.2 impact score by locking down his assignments. However, his erratic focus often exacted heavy hidden costs on the second unit. Despite tallying nine points on 12/19 vs SAS, frequent defensive breakdowns and poor rotational awareness cratered his overall impact to a brutal -6.6. To survive in this league, Newell must eradicate these mental lapses and bring a consistent physical edge to every single shift.

Asa Newell’s mid-season stretch was defined by wild, unpredictable swings between ruthless interior efficiency and complete rotational invisibility. Even when he chipped in offensively, hidden costs often dragged down his overall value. On 12/29 vs OKC, Newell tallied 9 points in 20 minutes, yet posted a brutal -10.8 impact score because his missed rotations and poor closeout angles made him a glaring defensive liability. Conversely, he occasionally flashed immense worth without needing to dominate the scoring column. During a 12/31 vs MIN matchup, he managed just 7 points but drove a stellar +5.3 impact by securing 9 rebounds and using relentless positioning to generate crucial extra possessions. Unfortunately, when handed a rare starting nod on 02/09 vs MIN, the heavier workload completely exposed his limitations. He lingered on the floor for 25 minutes but bled value to the tune of a -13.3 impact, vanishing entirely on offense and severely crippling his unit's effectiveness.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Newell's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~5 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 67% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Average defender. Newell doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 62 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Randle 39.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
C. Holmgren 24.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
J. Green 16.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 3
K. Ware 16.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 4
Z. Collins 15.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Salaün 14.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Raynaud 13.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 3
R. Kalkbrenner 13.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.45
PTS 6
J. Walker 13.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 2
S. Mamukelashvili 12.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Randle 24.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 4
J. Vanderbilt 19.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 5
C. Holmgren 19.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 4
K. Ware 17.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 2
J. Smith Jr. 16.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Green 15.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 2
Z. Collins 15.3 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 5
T. Salaün 15.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 5
Z. Nnaji 13.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.43
PTS 6
J. Walker 13.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

42
Games
5.0
PPG
2.0
RPG
0.5
APG
0.4
SPG
0.3
BPG
53.9
FG%
39.4
3P%
56.0
FT%
10.8
MPG

GAME LOG

42 games played