ATL

2025-26 Season

ASA NEWELL

Atlanta Hawks | Forward | 6-10
Asa Newell
5.0PPG
2.1RPG
0.6APG
11.1MPG
-5.4 Impact

Newell produces at an poor rate for a 11-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-5.4
Scoring +4.5
Points Scored 5.0 PPG = +5.0
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -1.5
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.0
Creation +0.2
Assists & Self-Creation 0.6 AST/g + self-creation = +0.2
Turnovers -1.2
Turnovers 0.5/g (live + dead blend) = -1.2
Defense -0.7
Steals 0.4/g = +0.9
Blocks 0.3/g = +0.3
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.3
Rebounds 2.1 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +1.4
Contested Shots 2.6/g = +0.5
Deflections 0.3/g = +0.2
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.2/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.4/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +5.1
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.5
Net Impact
-5.4
13th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 27th
6.4 PPG
Efficiency 47th
56.2% TS
Playmaking 9th
0.7 APG
Rebounding 18th
2.7 RPG
Defense 43th
+6.8/g
Hustle 64th
+14.0/g
Creation 12th
+1.36/g
Shot Making 21th
+3.74/g
TO Discipline 47th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Asa Newell's early season was defined by maddening volatility, toggling between extended garbage-time irrelevance and sudden bursts of high-volume production. When the coaching staff finally handed him a real rotational leash on 11/09 vs LAL, he responded with 17 points and five rebounds in 27 minutes. That performance generated a massive +16.6 Impact score, driven by his highly efficient shot selection and relentless effort on the glass. He flashed similar upside earlier on 10/25 vs OKC, logging a 12-point, 10-rebound double-double that earned a +5.2 Impact mark. Yet, those bright spots were repeatedly buried under a mountain of empty, microscopic shifts. Look at his brutal -13.3 Impact score on 11/14 vs UTA; he sleepwalked through six lifeless minutes without registering a single point, rebound, or assist, actively hurting the team with his total lack of floor engagement. Newell clearly possesses the talent to produce in extended action, but he must stop floating through his shorter assignments to earn a permanent rotation spot.

Asa Newell spent this mid-season stretch tumbling into a deep rotational slump, hemorrhaging value off the bench due to an alarming lack of interior presence. Even when his shot was falling, the hidden costs of his passive floor game dragged him down. On 12/28 vs NYK, he poured in 12 points on blistering 5-for-6 shooting, yet still registered a -0.1 Impact because he secured just two rebounds in 17 minutes. The glaring lack of physicality reached its nadir on 12/30 vs OKC. Given 20 minutes of run, Newell grabbed zero rebounds and forced bad looks during a 3-for-8 shooting night, plummeting to a catastrophic -15.8 Impact. He finally figured out the formula on 12/31 vs MIN. Though he scored just 7 points, Newell generated a massive +8.9 Impact by hauling in 9 rebounds, revealing that his path to NBA survival relies entirely on cleaning the glass rather than hunting buckets.

Asa Newell’s mid-season slog was defined by a frustrating inability to turn brief offensive flashes into winning basketball, right up until a shocking season-finale eruption. Look at his outing on 02/05 vs UTA. He managed 9 points on an efficient 4/7 from the floor, yet still posted a miserable -5.1 impact score because his production consisted entirely of empty calories with zero assists to keep the offense flowing. Given a rare starting nod shortly after on 02/09 vs MIN, he completely crumbled under the increased workload. He clanked his way to just 2 points on 1/5 shooting across 25 minutes, generating a catastrophic -15.3 impact score as his offensive hesitation and poor spacing actively sabotaged possessions. Just as he seemed destined to rot at the end of the bench, Newell flipped the script entirely on 04/12 vs MIA. Logging a massive 39 minutes as a starter, he attacked the glass relentlessly to tally 17 points and 11 rebounds, earning a stellar +10.7 impact score by finally combining his scoring touch with genuine physical force.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Newell has posted negative impact in 80% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 68% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Average defender. Newell doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 3 games. Longest cold streak: 11 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 62 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Randle 39.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
C. Holmgren 24.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
J. Green 16.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 3
K. Ware 16.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 4
Z. Collins 15.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Salaün 14.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Raynaud 13.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 3
R. Kalkbrenner 13.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.45
PTS 6
J. Walker 13.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 2
S. Mamukelashvili 12.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Randle 24.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 4
J. Vanderbilt 19.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 5
C. Holmgren 19.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 4
K. Ware 17.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 2
J. Smith Jr. 16.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Green 15.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 2
Z. Collins 15.3 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 5
T. Salaün 15.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 5
Z. Nnaji 13.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.43
PTS 6
J. Walker 13.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

46
Games
5.0
PPG
2.1
RPG
0.6
APG
0.4
SPG
0.3
BPG
53.8
FG%
38.7
3P%
55.2
FT%
11.1
MPG

GAME LOG

46 games played