2025-26 Season
KRISTAPS PORZIŅĢIS
2025-26 Season
KRISTAPS PORZIŅĢIS
Porziņģis produces at an elite rate for a 24-minute workload.
Porziņģis produces at an elite rate for a 24-minute workload.
PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology
TEAM COMPARISON
of 19 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
Similar Players
Same position, closest production profile this season.
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 234 Forwards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Kristaps Porziņģis defined the opening stretch of his season through sheer adaptability, morphing from a mere floor-spacer into a gritty, multifaceted anchor. Even when his perimeter touch abandoned him, he consistently found ways to tilt the floor in his team's favor. Look at his 11/08 vs TOR performance. He shot a miserable 4-for-16 from the field, yet still posted a +9.9 Impact by crashing the glass for seven rebounds and acting as a massive deterrent on defense. A few days earlier, during his 11/02 vs CLE matchup, he generated a +11.6 Impact despite scoring just 15 points, creating immense non-scoring value by dishing out five assists and vacuuming up 12 boards. When his jumper actually clicked, the results were devastating. He closed out this run on 11/23 vs NOP with a hyper-efficient 30-point outburst on 11-of-17 shooting, yielding a monstrous +21.1 Impact. He isn't just a tall shooter anymore; he is a relentless two-way problem.
Transitioning into a volatile bench role defined this bizarre twelve-game stretch for Kristaps Porziņģis. When his jumper abandoned him, he became an active detriment to the offense. He logged an abysmal -9.0 Impact score on 01/03 vs NYK after forcing up flat jumpers to finish 1-for-8 from the floor with just 4 points. Yet, he could still take over a game completely, erupting on 03/16 vs WAS. He poured in 30 points in 26 minutes, earning a massive +21.0 Impact score by blending hyper-efficient shooting with crisp ball movement. He even learned to salvage his bad shooting nights by the end of the stretch. During a clunky 4-for-13 shooting performance for just 11 points on 03/18 vs BOS, he still managed a +8.6 Impact score by staying engaged on the glass for 5 rebounds and anchoring the interior defense.
Kristaps Porziņģis spent this stretch riding a frustrating seesaw between unstoppable offensive force and passive perimeter liability. When his stroke caught fire, he was utterly dominant. He erupted for 28 points and a massive +23.1 impact on 03/27 vs WAS by drilling five three-pointers. Yet, just two days prior on 03/25 vs BKN, he managed a respectable 17 points but posted a dismal -7.7 impact. That negative mark stemmed from hidden defensive lapses and a total lack of perimeter gravity that dragged down his overall effectiveness despite the decent scoring total. On the flip side, Porziņģis occasionally generated value when his jumper abandoned him. During his outing on 04/12 vs LAC, he clanked all four of his attempts from deep and scored just 12 points, but still manufactured a +5.4 impact. He salvaged that ugly shooting night by crashing the glass for eight rebounds and executing the unglamorous dirty work inside.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Volatile for his role. Porziņģis has noticeable ups and downs, with scoring moving ~7 points between games.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 44% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Defensive difference-maker. Porziņģis consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.
Small downward trend. First-half impact: +6.6, second-half: +4.4. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.
Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 14 games. Longest cold streak: 2 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY
Based on 52 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
35 games played