BKN

2025-26 Season

DANNY WOLF

Brooklyn Nets | Forward | 6-11
Danny Wolf
8.9 PPG
4.9 RPG
2.2 APG
20.8 MPG
-1.3 Impact

Wolf produces at an below average rate for a 21-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-1.3
Scoring +4.7
Points 8.9 PPG × +1.00 = +8.9
Missed 2PT 2.1/g × -0.78 = -1.6
Missed 3PT 2.5/g × -0.87 = -2.2
Missed FT 0.4/g × -1.00 = -0.4
Creation +2.6
Assists 2.2/g × +0.50 = +1.1
Off. Rebounds 1.2/g × +1.26 = +1.5
Turnovers -2.5
Turnovers 1.3/g × -1.95 = -2.5
Defense +0.8
Steals 0.5/g × +2.30 = +1.1
Blocks 0.6/g × +0.90 = +0.5
Def. Rebounds 3.7/g × +0.30 = +1.1
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.2
Contested Shots 5.3/g × +0.20 = +1.1
Deflections 1.2/g × +0.65 = +0.8
Loose Balls 0.2/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.2/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +7.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.1
Net Impact
-1.3
33th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 50th
9.4 PPG
Efficiency 17th
50.5% TS
Playmaking 69th
2.3 APG
Rebounding 67th
5.2 RPG
Rim Protection 53th
0.14/min
Hustle 43th
0.10/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 25th
0.06/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

A wildly erratic rollercoaster of perimeter flashes and baffling defensive lapses defined Danny Wolf's early season. He looked like a dangerous stretch big on 11/29 vs MIL, riding a massive surge in perimeter confidence to 22 points and a +6.3 impact score. That scoring punch often carried a steep hidden cost. During the 12/04 vs UTA matchup, Wolf poured in 17 points but still posted a -0.2 impact because sluggish pick-and-roll coverage gave everything right back to the opposition. He eventually learned to contribute without dominating the ball. On 01/04 vs DEN, Wolf scored a mere 2 points but generated a robust +4.8 impact score purely through excellent weak-side rim protection.

This twenty-game stretch was a maddening rollercoaster of erratic perimeter shooting and shifting roles for Danny Wolf. When his jumper abandoned him, the results were catastrophic. This was glaringly obvious on 02/01 vs DET, where a brutal 0-for-5 night from deep cratered his offensive value and saddled him with a dismal -11.9 impact score. However, he occasionally salvaged quiet offensive nights through sheer grit, like on 01/14 vs NOP. Despite scoring just five points in that contest, he posted a +1.6 impact score by doing the dirty work in the trenches and keeping active hands in the passing lanes. On the flip side, even his higher-scoring nights frequently carried hidden costs that hurt the broader offense.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Wolf's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~5 points per game.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 34% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Defensive difference-maker. Wolf consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 3 games. Longest cold streak: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 60 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

M. Buzelis 49.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 10
B. Coulibaly 42.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Harris 39.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
A. Bona 35.0 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
J. Jaquez Jr. 34.8 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
J. Smith 33.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 6
J. Johnson 30.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Flagg 30.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 6
O. Anunoby 27.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 5
N. Batum 25.6 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 4

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

M. Buzelis 40.9 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
A. Bona 38.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 7
B. Coulibaly 29.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Harris 26.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
B. Adebayo 25.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 5
B. Portis 24.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.32
PTS 8
C. Flagg 24.1 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 8
I. Okoro 23.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
N. Batum 23.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 3
J. Smith 22.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 6

SEASON STATS

57
Games
8.9
PPG
4.9
RPG
2.2
APG
0.5
SPG
0.6
BPG
40.5
FG%
32.2
3P%
77.1
FT%
20.8
MPG

GAME LOG

57 games played