GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

HOU Houston Rockets
17
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+3.5

High-quality shot selection and decisive offensive moves generated a highly efficient scoring output. He anchored the rebounding effort on both ends, limiting second-chance points and securing crucial defensive stops. His ability to switch onto guards on the perimeter was vital during late-game defensive stands.

Shooting
FG 7/10 (70.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 75.1%
USG% 15.6%
Net Rtg -30.0
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.2m
Offense +13.1
Hustle +2.6
Defense +6.7
Raw total +22.4
Avg player in 33.2m -18.9
Impact +3.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 1
S Amen Thompson 32.8m
8
pts
5
reb
7
ast
Impact
-8.0

Sloppy ball-handling and mistimed passes into tight windows fueled opponent fast breaks and tanked his net impact. While his on-ball defense remained disruptive, a lack of perimeter shooting allowed defenders to pack the paint. The offense stalled out whenever he operated as the primary initiator in the half-court.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.8%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg -14.6
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.8m
Offense +2.7
Hustle +1.8
Defense +6.1
Raw total +10.6
Avg player in 32.8m -18.6
Impact -8.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 5
S Kevin Durant 31.3m
31
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+10.1

Elite shot-making combined with suffocating weak-side rim protection drove a dominant two-way impact. He effortlessly diagnosed double-teams, either shooting over the top or making the right read to keep the offense humming. His length disrupted passing lanes all night, turning defense into immediate offense.

Shooting
FG 11/21 (52.4%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 6/8 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.2%
USG% 39.0%
Net Rtg -20.4
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.3m
Offense +11.1
Hustle +4.3
Defense +12.4
Raw total +27.8
Avg player in 31.3m -17.7
Impact +10.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 5
BLK 0
TO 6
S Alperen Sengun 27.8m
7
pts
9
reb
5
ast
Impact
-7.0

Forcing heavily contested shots in the post and struggling to finish through contact severely hampered his effectiveness. His inability to contain the pick-and-roll allowed guards to turn the corner repeatedly, compromising the entire defensive shell. A lack of offensive rhythm bled into sluggish transition defense.

Shooting
FG 3/11 (27.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 29.5%
USG% 19.7%
Net Rtg -10.3
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.8m
Offense +6.1
Hustle +2.1
Defense +0.5
Raw total +8.7
Avg player in 27.8m -15.7
Impact -7.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 58.8%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
S Josh Okogie 20.5m
6
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.3

Capitalizing on a few open looks wasn't enough to overcome his spacing issues and defensive lapses. He struggled to navigate through off-ball screens, leaving shooters with too much daylight. The offensive scheme simply bogged down whenever he was stationed on the perimeter.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 104.2%
USG% 8.2%
Net Rtg -55.7
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.5m
Offense +4.3
Hustle +1.4
Defense +1.6
Raw total +7.3
Avg player in 20.5m -11.6
Impact -4.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
7
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.8

A brutal shooting slump characterized by rushed attempts early in the shot clock destroyed his offensive impact. He tried to compensate with high-energy defensive rotations, but the sheer volume of missed jumpers fueled opponent transition opportunities. His inability to find a rhythm derailed the second unit's offensive flow.

Shooting
FG 2/10 (20.0%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 32.2%
USG% 23.2%
Net Rtg -26.7
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.1m
Offense -3.6
Hustle +3.1
Defense +6.2
Raw total +5.7
Avg player in 22.1m -12.5
Impact -6.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
Clint Capela 17.3m
6
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
+7.7

Relentless activity on the offensive glass and elite screen-setting generated extra possessions and wide-open looks for guards. He dominated the paint defensively, altering shots and securing tough defensive rebounds in traffic. His vertical spacing as a lob threat kept the opposing defense constantly on its heels.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 11.9%
Net Rtg +14.3
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.3m
Offense +4.4
Hustle +5.5
Defense +7.6
Raw total +17.5
Avg player in 17.3m -9.8
Impact +7.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-4.2

Missing wide-open corner threes completely neutralized his offensive value and allowed the defense to double the post with impunity. He was a step slow on defensive rotations, frequently getting caught out of position on baseline drives. A lack of physical presence on the glass compounded his struggles.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 11.9%
Net Rtg -61.0
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.2m
Offense +1.4
Hustle +2.1
Defense +1.6
Raw total +5.1
Avg player in 16.2m -9.3
Impact -4.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
5
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
+4.1

Making quick, decisive reads and capitalizing on limited touches drove a highly efficient stint on the floor. Active hands in the passing lanes disrupted the opponent's offensive rhythm and sparked transition breaks. He perfectly executed the defensive game plan by staying glued to his assignment off the ball.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 9.1%
Net Rtg +33.7
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.6m
Offense +5.4
Hustle +2.6
Defense +4.9
Raw total +12.9
Avg player in 15.6m -8.8
Impact +4.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
Jeff Green 7.7m
6
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+8.2

Veteran savvy and timely cuts to the basket maximized his brief time on the floor. He provided excellent weak-side help defense, drawing a crucial charge that swung the momentum. Calm decision-making stabilized the second unit during a chaotic stretch of the game.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 67.6%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +80.0
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.7m
Offense +4.8
Hustle +4.0
Defense +3.8
Raw total +12.6
Avg player in 7.7m -4.4
Impact +8.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
JD Davison 7.7m
4
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-1.8

Over-dribbling and missing defensive assignments on back-door cuts dragged his net impact into the red. While he managed to find the bottom of the net, a lack of defensive awareness gave those points right back. He needs to process the game faster to avoid being a liability in half-court defensive sets.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 31.3%
Net Rtg +80.0
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.7m
Offense +1.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.1
Raw total +2.6
Avg player in 7.7m -4.4
Impact -1.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.1

A largely invisible offensive shift was slightly offset by pesky point-of-attack defense against opposing ball-handlers. He failed to generate any rim pressure, resulting in stagnant perimeter passing and late-clock bailouts. His inability to tilt the defense kept his overall impact hovering right around neutral.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg +80.0
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.7m
Offense +0.5
Hustle +1.5
Defense +2.3
Raw total +4.3
Avg player in 7.7m -4.4
Impact -0.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
CHA Charlotte Hornets
S Kon Knueppel 32.4m
24
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-6.8

Despite a high-volume scoring surge, his overall impact cratered due to defensive lapses and costly live-ball turnovers. Giving up open driving lanes negated his offensive efficiency, leaving him as a net negative on the floor. Poor perimeter containment during a crucial third-quarter stretch defined his minutes.

Shooting
FG 8/13 (61.5%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.7%
USG% 27.2%
Net Rtg +2.9
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.4m
Offense +10.6
Hustle +1.2
Defense -0.2
Raw total +11.6
Avg player in 32.4m -18.4
Impact -6.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 30.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 6
S Miles Bridges 32.1m
18
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
+2.3

A heavy diet of contested jumpers dragged down his offensive efficiency, but he salvaged his value on the other end of the floor. Strong weak-side rotations and rim contests drove a solid defensive rating. His ability to switch onto smaller guards kept the defensive scheme intact during crucial stretches.

Shooting
FG 7/17 (41.2%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.6%
USG% 21.3%
Net Rtg +19.9
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.1m
Offense +14.2
Hustle +1.1
Defense +5.2
Raw total +20.5
Avg player in 32.1m -18.2
Impact +2.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Moussa Diabaté 29.4m
7
pts
12
reb
4
ast
Impact
+9.5

Dominating the glass and generating second-chance opportunities fueled a massive positive impact. His relentless motor translated into high hustle metrics, specifically through deflections and contested defensive rebounds. He anchored the interior defense beautifully, altering shots without committing costly fouls.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.5%
USG% 9.3%
Net Rtg +29.6
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.4m
Offense +15.4
Hustle +4.0
Defense +6.7
Raw total +26.1
Avg player in 29.4m -16.6
Impact +9.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 41.2%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
S LaMelo Ball 28.6m
20
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
-6.4

Inefficient shot selection and forced isolation plays severely damaged his net impact. Settling for heavily contested deep threes rather than probing the defense allowed the opponent to leak out in transition. His defensive effort was merely passable, failing to offset the empty offensive possessions.

Shooting
FG 7/19 (36.8%)
3PT 5/12 (41.7%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.3%
USG% 32.9%
Net Rtg +13.8
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.6m
Offense +6.9
Hustle +1.9
Defense +1.1
Raw total +9.9
Avg player in 28.6m -16.3
Impact -6.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Brandon Miller 21.5m
11
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.4

An uncharacteristic lack of offensive aggression and poor spacing cratered his overall value. While his point-of-attack defense remained stout, stagnant off-ball movement bogged down the team's half-court sets. The inability to stretch the floor or punish closeouts made him an offensive liability in this matchup.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.7%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg -24.3
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.5m
Offense -2.9
Hustle +1.6
Defense +7.0
Raw total +5.7
Avg player in 21.5m -12.1
Impact -6.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 6
Josh Green 22.9m
14
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
+16.6

Flawless offensive execution and elite defensive disruption resulted in a spectacular two-way performance. He completely shut down his primary assignment while generating transition opportunities through timely steals and deflections. Perfectly timed baseline cuts punished the defense every time they over-helped.

Shooting
FG 4/4 (100.0%)
3PT 3/3 (100.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 131.6%
USG% 11.3%
Net Rtg +41.3
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.9m
Offense +13.9
Hustle +5.6
Defense +10.0
Raw total +29.5
Avg player in 22.9m -12.9
Impact +16.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 4
BLK 1
TO 1
Sion James 21.9m
6
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.0

Solid perimeter defense and decent hustle plays kept him afloat, but offensive hesitancy limited his overall ceiling. Passing up open catch-and-shoot opportunities disrupted the offensive flow and led to late-clock bailout shots. He needs to process reads faster to avoid stalling the team's momentum.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 8.6%
Net Rtg +6.6
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.9m
Offense +3.6
Hustle +2.0
Defense +5.8
Raw total +11.4
Avg player in 21.9m -12.4
Impact -1.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+10.0

Complete offensive invisibility was entirely masked by a masterclass in drop coverage and rim protection. He deterred countless drives into the paint, forcing the opposition into low-percentage mid-range floaters. His verticality ruled the restricted area, proving that a zero-usage player can still swing a game.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 34.7%
USG% 6.7%
Net Rtg -4.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.7m
Offense +4.4
Hustle +3.5
Defense +12.7
Raw total +20.6
Avg player in 18.7m -10.6
Impact +10.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 4
BLK 2
TO 0
Tre Mann 16.8m
5
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-9.1

A disastrous shooting night characterized by forced drives into heavy traffic tanked his net impact. Continually challenging rim protectors rather than kicking out to shooters resulted in empty trips and transition run-outs for the opponent. His defensive effort couldn't salvage a night where his shot selection actively hurt the team.

Shooting
FG 1/10 (10.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 23.0%
USG% 29.5%
Net Rtg +27.7
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.8m
Offense -3.5
Hustle +1.2
Defense +2.8
Raw total +0.5
Avg player in 16.8m -9.6
Impact -9.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
2
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.6

Throwing up bricks from the perimeter destroyed offensive spacing and allowed defenders to sag off him completely. Although he fought hard through screens and provided solid positional defense, the lack of scoring gravity was too much to overcome. His inability to punish traps effectively stalled out multiple possessions.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 25.8%
USG% 11.9%
Net Rtg -7.1
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.9m
Offense -1.3
Hustle +3.5
Defense +2.2
Raw total +4.4
Avg player in 15.9m -9.0
Impact -4.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1