BKN

2025-26 Season

EGOR DËMIN

Brooklyn Nets | Guard | 6-8
Egor Dëmin
10.3 PPG
3.2 RPG
3.3 APG
25.2 MPG
-3.2 Impact

Dëmin produces at an below average rate for a 25-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-3.2
Scoring +5.7
Points 10.3 PPG × +1.00 = +10.3
Missed 2PT 1.4/g × -0.78 = -1.1
Missed 3PT 3.8/g × -0.87 = -3.3
Missed FT 0.2/g × -1.00 = -0.2
Creation +2.6
Assists 3.3/g × +0.50 = +1.6
Off. Rebounds 0.8/g × +1.26 = +1.0
Turnovers -3.3
Turnovers 1.7/g × -1.95 = -3.3
Defense +0.9
Steals 0.8/g × +2.30 = +1.8
Blocks 0.3/g × +0.90 = +0.3
Def. Rebounds 2.4/g × +0.30 = +0.7
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.5
Contested Shots 4.2/g × +0.20 = +0.8
Deflections 1.7/g × +0.65 = +1.1
Charges Drawn 0.1/g × +2.70 = +0.3
Loose Balls 0.3/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.3/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Raw Impact +8.4
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.6
Net Impact
-3.2
22th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 56th
10.3 PPG
Efficiency 53th
55.1% TS
Playmaking 62th
3.3 APG
Rebounding 55th
3.2 RPG
Rim Protection 51th
0.12/min
Hustle 34th
0.09/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 33th
0.07/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Egor Dëmin’s first twenty games were defined by a rocky transition into the starting rotation, plagued by erratic shot selection and costly hidden mistakes. Even when he found the bottom of the net, as he did while scoring 12 points on 11/18 vs BOS, poor finishing inside the arc and live-ball turnovers dragged his impact score down to a disappointing -2.4. His decision-making frequently short-circuited the offense entirely. He bottomed out on 11/23 vs TOR, where a barrage of forced, contested jumpers resulted in a dreadful -13.1 impact score. He occasionally flashed his true ceiling when he trusted his outside stroke, peaking on 11/28 vs PHI. In that matchup, Dëmin poured in 23 points and posted a stellar +6.2 impact score because his unwavering confidence from beyond the arc stretched the opposing defense to its breaking point. To survive as a viable NBA starter, he must stop bleeding value through reckless passing and empty possessions.

Egor Dëmin’s midseason stretch was defined by maddening volatility, swinging wildly between lethal sharpshooting and self-destructive decision-making. On 12/23 vs PHI, he poured in 20 points, yet dragged his team down to a -0.7 impact score because his blistering perimeter execution merely masked glaring defensive liabilities. The hidden costs of his game were even more obvious on 12/18 vs MIA. Despite scoring 14 points, a brutal combination of high usage and terrible shot selection resulted in a severely damaging -12.5 impact. When he actually played within the flow of the offense, the results were spectacular. He completely controlled the offensive tempo on 01/30 vs UTA, punishing drop coverage to generate a massive +12.8 impact alongside 25 points and 10 rebounds. Until he stops torpedoing his own value with forced looks and sloppy ball security, his elite floor-spacing gravity will continue to be overshadowed by his mistakes.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Inconsistent. Dëmin has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~6 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 39% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Defensive difference-maker. Dëmin consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 8 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 54 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

A. Dosunmu 52.9 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.06
PTS 3
T. Maxey 51.4 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.29
PTS 15
C. McCollum 44.6 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 10
P. Pritchard 43.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
K. Dunn 38.5 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.08
PTS 3
J. Suggs 37.3 poss
FG% 54.5%
3P% 57.1%
PPP 0.51
PTS 19
J. Fears 35.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 3
M. Bridges 35.6 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.08
PTS 3
T. Johnson 34.6 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.14
PTS 5
A. Black 33.9 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 5

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

A. Black 48.7 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 3
D. White 48.3 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 4
J. McCain 46.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.19
PTS 9
M. Bridges 39.5 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 8
A. Dosunmu 32.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.31
PTS 10
K. Dunn 30.5 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3
I. Quickley 29.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.54
PTS 16
M. Buzelis 28.7 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 6
B. Coulibaly 27.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 8
J. Wells 27.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

52
Games
10.3
PPG
3.2
RPG
3.3
APG
0.8
SPG
0.3
BPG
39.9
FG%
38.5
3P%
83.1
FT%
25.2
MPG

GAME LOG

52 games played