BKN

2025-26 Season

TYSON ETIENNE

Brooklyn Nets | Guard | 6-0
Tyson Etienne
7.9PPG
1.1RPG
1.7APG
15.8MPG
-2.9 Impact

Etienne produces at an below average rate for a 16-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-2.9
Scoring +7.0
Points Scored 7.9 PPG = +7.9
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -2.9
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.0
Creation +0.4
Assists & Self-Creation 1.7 AST/g + self-creation = +0.4
Turnovers -1.3
Turnovers 0.7/g (live + dead blend) = -1.3
Defense -0.4
Steals 0.5/g = +1.1
Blocks 0.0/g = +0.0
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.5
Hustle & Effort +0.8
Rebounds 1.1 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.3
Contested Shots 0.6/g = +0.1
Deflections 0.5/g = +0.3
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.2/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.0/g = +0.0
Raw Impact +6.5
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.4
Net Impact
-2.9
41st pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 52th
9.7 PPG
Efficiency 26th
51.0% TS
Playmaking 37th
2.1 APG
Rebounding 7th
1.5 RPG
Defense 8th
+4.1/g
Hustle 12th
+5.1/g
Creation 8th
+1.32/g
Shot Making 36th
+5.66/g
TO Discipline 77th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Tyson Etienne’s first eight games of the season were defined by brutal inefficiency and empty garbage-time minutes. When given a brief ten-minute window on 11/09 vs NYK, he chucked up four fruitless shots—including three misses from deep—resulting in an abysmal -12.0 impact score. He offered absolutely nothing else on the floor. His brief appearances consistently dragged down the lineup, as seen on 10/27 vs HOU where five scoreless, rebound-less minutes yielded a harsh -10.7 impact score. He finally found the bottom of the net on 11/30 vs MIL, hitting both of his three-point attempts for six points. Yet, even that perfect shooting night still generated a -1.3 impact score, reflecting his complete inability to facilitate or defend. When a guard fails to grab a single rebound and manages just one total assist across eight appearances, those fleeting minutes become a massive liability.

Tyson Etienne’s mid-March stretch began as a frustrating hunt for minutes before erupting into a bona fide bench-scoring heater. He looked completely lost on 03/09 vs MEM. In just five minutes of action, he clanked three of his four shots to post a dismal -13.2 Impact score. The turning point arrived on 03/14 vs PHI, where he managed a +3.1 Impact despite a highly inefficient 11-point performance on 3-for-11 shooting. That surprisingly positive mark stemmed entirely from his sheer defensive grit and hustle, grabbing four rebounds to generate value while his jumper failed him. Once his outside shot finally clicked, his overall effectiveness skyrocketed. He capped the stretch brilliantly on 03/23 vs POR with 18 points and four assists, earning a high-water +7.0 Impact score by blending elite perimeter shot-making with crisp ball movement.

A chaotic shift in role defined this eight-game stretch for Tyson Etienne, transforming him from a quiet reserve into an erratic, high-volume gunner. When thrust into the starting lineup on 04/09 vs IND, the results were disastrous. Despite scoring a respectable 14 points in 39 minutes, Etienne posted a brutal -7.4 impact score because his abysmal 5-for-17 shooting and poor shot selection actively killed his team's offensive momentum. He immediately redeemed himself the very next night on 04/10 vs MIL. Finding his rhythm from deep, he drained six triples on his way to 23 points, generating a stellar +8.3 impact by finally punishing defensive rotations instead of forcing bad looks. Even when his perimeter touch abandoned him on 04/12 vs TOR with a dreadful 2-for-10 mark from beyond the arc, he still tallied 20 points and a +7.6 impact. He salvaged that outing by relying on relentless defensive energy and hustle to create hidden value when the deep shots refused to fall.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Inconsistent. Etienne has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~7 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 38% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -7.2, second-half: +1.4. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 11 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 31 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

S. Henderson 20.4 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.44
PTS 9
V. Edgecombe 17.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Jenkins 17.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
G. Vincent 16.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Payne 15.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.19
PTS 3
C. Wallace 12.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
S. Cissoko 12.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 5
B. Wesley 12.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.41
PTS 5
K. Murray 10.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 2
T. Camara 10.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 4

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

S. Henderson 24.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
G. Vincent 15.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 3
V. Edgecombe 14.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 2
D. Jenkins 11.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 4
J. Holiday 11.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 2
C. Payne 11.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Wesley 10.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.46
PTS 5
D. Carter 10.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 4
C. McCollum 10.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 4
T. Kolek 9.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

24
Games
7.9
PPG
1.1
RPG
1.7
APG
0.5
SPG
0.0
BPG
40.0
FG%
39.8
3P%
83.3
FT%
15.8
MPG

GAME LOG

24 games played