BKN

2025-26 Season

TYSON ETIENNE

Brooklyn Nets | Guard | 6-0
Tyson Etienne
5.8 PPG
0.7 RPG
1.1 APG
11.3 MPG
-1.2 Impact

Etienne produces at an below average rate for a 11-minute workload. Defensive impact (-1.1/game) is a concern.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-1.2
Scoring +3.6
Points 5.8 PPG × +1.00 = +5.8
Missed 2PT 0.5/g × -0.78 = -0.4
Missed 3PT 2.0/g × -0.87 = -1.7
Missed FT 0.1/g × -1.00 = -0.1
Creation +0.9
Assists 1.1/g × +0.50 = +0.6
Off. Rebounds 0.2/g × +1.26 = +0.3
Turnovers -1.2
Turnovers 0.6/g × -1.95 = -1.2
Defense -1.1
Steals 0.3/g × +2.30 = +0.7
Blocks 0.0/g × +0.90 = +0.0
Def. Rebounds 0.5/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.3
Contested Shots 0.8/g × +0.20 = +0.2
Deflections 0.6/g × +0.65 = +0.4
Loose Balls 0.3/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.2/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.5
Raw Impact +3.5
Baseline (game-average expected) −4.7
Net Impact
-1.2
52th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 37th
7.5 PPG
Efficiency 38th
53.1% TS
Playmaking 21th
1.4 APG
Rebounding 1th
1.0 RPG
Rim Protection 1th
0.02/min
Hustle 33th
0.09/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 71th
0.04/min

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Typical consistency. Etienne is positive more often than not (50% of games) with scoring varying ~6 points from the average.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 29% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -2.0, second-half: -0.3. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 31 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

S. Henderson 20.4 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.44
PTS 9
V. Edgecombe 17.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Jenkins 17.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
G. Vincent 16.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Payne 15.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.19
PTS 3
C. Wallace 12.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
S. Cissoko 12.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 5
B. Wesley 12.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.41
PTS 5
K. Murray 10.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 2
T. Camara 10.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 4

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

S. Henderson 24.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
G. Vincent 15.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 3
V. Edgecombe 14.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 2
D. Jenkins 11.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 4
J. Holiday 11.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 2
C. Payne 11.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Wesley 10.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.46
PTS 5
D. Carter 10.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 4
C. McCollum 10.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 4
T. Kolek 9.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

18
Games
5.8
PPG
0.7
RPG
1.1
APG
0.3
SPG
0.0
BPG
40.8
FG%
42.9
3P%
88.9
FT%
11.3
MPG