2025-26 Season
CHRIS YOUNGBLOOD
2025-26 Season
CHRIS YOUNGBLOOD
Youngblood produces at an poor rate for a 5-minute workload.
Youngblood produces at an poor rate for a 5-minute workload.
PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology
TEAM COMPARISON
of 17 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
Similar Players
Same position, closest production profile this season.
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Chris Youngblood’s first dozen games of the 2025-26 season were defined by a desperate, mostly fruitless search to justify an NBA roster spot. When he actually peeled off his warmups, the on-court results were routinely disastrous. Look no further than his stint on 11/08 vs SAC, where he posted a staggering -15.2 impact score. That abysmal rating stemmed from eight completely empty minutes of cardio, missing both of his shot attempts while failing to record a single rebound or assist. Even his absolute peak was technically a net negative. During an 11/02 vs NOP matchup, Youngblood managed to hit a pair of threes for six points, yet still finished with a -2.0 impact score because his brief seven-minute appearance yielded zero assists and just one rebound, offering zero secondary value. He closed this brutal stretch on 11/13 vs LAL with another ghost-like performance, logging a -8.1 impact score after missing his only shot and grabbing just a single rebound in eight minutes. If you cannot score, defend, or facilitate in limited action, the far end of the bench is exactly where you belong.
Chris Youngblood spent this eleven-game stretch trapped in the deepest corners of the rotation, logging empty minutes that actively hurt his team. During an eight-minute stint on 11/24 vs POR, he forced up two bad looks from deep, missed both, and finished with a brutal -10.7 Impact score. That abysmal rating stems directly from his poor shot selection and a complete failure to generate defensive stops. Even when he managed to score, like his five-point burst on 11/22 vs UTA, his overall influence remained firmly in the red with a -3.9 Impact. A glaring lack of playmaking and zero hustle plays turned those sparse buckets into empty calories. By the time he went completely scoreless in two minutes on 12/23 vs MEM, posting another staggering -10.7 Impact, his role had fully devolved into a human victory cigar. Merely existing on the court is not enough.
Chris Youngblood's mid-season stretch was defined by deep-bench irrelevance punctuated by erratic, trigger-happy cameos. His lone bright spot arrived on 01/03 vs GSW. He scored 9 points by firing up seven three-pointers in just eight minutes, hitting three of them to post a +2.8 impact score. That aggressive floor-spacing gave the offense a brief jolt, but his volume-heavy approach usually backfired. When finally handed a real rotation opportunity on 02/04 vs SAS, he logged 20 minutes but managed just 5 points on 2-of-6 shooting. His abysmal -8.6 impact score in that contest reflected empty offensive possessions and a total inability to generate playmaking when his jumper clanked. Even when he caught fire, like hitting both of his attempts from deep for 6 points in a three-minute stint on 01/19 vs CLE, he still recorded a negative -1.9 impact. Those brief scoring bursts were completely negated by defensive bleeding and a stubborn refusal to do anything besides hunt his own shot.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Struggling. Youngblood has posted negative impact in 97% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.
Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -7.8, second-half: -6.0. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.
In a rough stretch — 9 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 24 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago
Based on 55 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
34 games played