2025-26 Season
LINDY WATERS III
2025-26 Season
LINDY WATERS III
III produces at an poor rate for a 7-minute workload.
III produces at an poor rate for a 7-minute workload.
PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology
TEAM COMPARISON
of 13 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
Similar Players
Same position, closest production profile this season.
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Lindy Waters III spent the first quarter of the season fighting irrelevance at the end of the bench, logging empty minutes that actively hurt his team. During a brutal 11/13 vs GSW appearance, he recorded zero points, rebounds, or assists in four minutes, yielding a disastrous -11.0 Impact score. His inability to contribute anything on the glass or as a playmaker meant he was essentially a ghost on the floor, bleeding value through sheer inactivity. The offensive struggles dragged on through a 12/04 vs ORL matchup, where he bricked all three of his attempts from deep to generate a miserable -8.0 Impact. However, a sudden pulse finally emerged on 12/20 vs ATL. Given an extended 17-minute run, Waters knocked down two of his four three-point attempts to score eight points, earning a +3.3 Impact. That late spark revealed that when his perimeter shot actually falls, he can be a viable floor-spacer rather than a complete lineup liability.
Lindy Waters III spent this midseason stretch marooned at the end of the bench, struggling to find any rhythm during sporadic, low-leverage minutes. His brief appearances were routinely plagued by cold shooting and a complete lack of peripheral production. During an abysmal outing on 01/19 vs UTA, Waters missed all three of his field goal attempts and recorded zero rebounds or assists in five minutes, resulting in a disastrous -15.1 Impact score. Even when given an extended leash on 01/03 vs IND, his stretch-high 7 points and 3 rebounds in 14 minutes still yielded a -1.3 Impact score. Although he hit a pair of three-pointers in that contest, his failure to consistently disrupt the opponent's offense or create quality looks for others kept his overall value in the red. The offensive futility continued on 01/14 vs OKC, where a clunky 1-for-5 shooting night across 13 minutes generated a bleak -8.9 Impact score. When a fringe rotation player cannot hit open shots or contribute on the glass, those fleeting minutes quickly become a liability.
Lindy Waters III spent this late-season stretch marooned at the end of the bench, struggling to generate any real value during sparse rotational cameos. Even when given a rare extended runway on 03/17 vs SAC, his 11 points and four rebounds amounted to empty calories. Despite the decent shooting numbers, disjointed execution and a failure to elevate his teammates dragged his overall influence down to a -1.9 Impact score. Things turned downright ugly on 03/28 vs MIL. He bricked all three of his attempts from beyond the arc and offered zero playmaking to offset the misses, resulting in a disastrous -11.9 Impact score. His lone bright spot arrived on 03/03 vs PHI. He managed a +0.6 Impact score in 12 minutes, using active defensive hustle and a pair of three-pointers to briefly stabilize the second unit.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Struggling. III has posted negative impact in 93% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 50% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -8.3, second-half: -6.5. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.
Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 1 games. Longest cold streak: 16 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago
Based on 63 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
45 games played