LAL

2025-26 Season

AUSTIN REAVES

Los Angeles Lakers | Guard | 6-5
Austin Reaves
23.3PPG
4.7RPG
5.5APG
34.5MPG
+11.3 Impact

Reaves produces at an elite rate for a 34-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+11.3
Scoring +21.8
Points Scored 23.3 PPG = +23.3
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -6.1
Shot Making above expected FG% = +4.6
Creation +2.6
Assists & Self-Creation 5.5 AST/g + self-creation = +2.6
Turnovers -6.9
Turnovers 3.0/g (live + dead blend) = -6.9
Defense +0.8
Steals 1.1/g = +2.5
Blocks 0.4/g = +0.4
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.1
Hustle & Effort +3.4
Rebounds 4.7 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.1
Contested Shots 3.0/g = +0.6
Deflections 2.2/g = +1.4
Charges Drawn 0.3/g = +0.8
Loose Balls 0.8/g = +0.4
Screen Assists 0.3/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +21.7
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.4
Net Impact
+11.3
94th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 94th
23.3 PPG
Efficiency 97th
63.6% TS
Playmaking 86th
5.5 APG
Rebounding 85th
4.7 RPG
Defense 77th
+9.7/g
Hustle 78th
+11.7/g
Creation 99th
+7.37/g
Shot Making 84th
+9.00/g
TO Discipline 15th
0.09/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Austin Reaves opened the 2025-26 season by transforming from a reliable secondary option into an absolute offensive supernova. The peak of this relentless scoring tear arrived on 10/26 vs SAC, where he erupted for 51 points, 11 rebounds, and nine assists to generate an absurd +56.8 Impact score. That staggering metric stemmed directly from his ruthless 6-of-10 efficiency from deep and aggressive rebounding that completely overwhelmed Sacramento's defense. He wasn't entirely immune to off nights. On 11/13 vs OKC, a brutal 0-for-5 slump from beyond the arc and stagnant playmaking dragged him down to a -10.1 Impact score. Yet he quickly corrected course, punishing defenders on 11/29 vs DAL with 38 points on a hyper-efficient 12-of-15 shooting display. By eliminating forced shots and attacking his spots with lethal precision, Reaves earned a massive +38.6 Impact score to remind the league of his terrifying new ceiling.

This volatile winter stretch for Austin Reaves was defined by a jarring mid-season demotion to the bench and a subsequent reinvention of his offensive approach. He initially looked like an unstoppable primary creator, hanging a massive 44 points and 10 assists on 12/05 vs TOR for a +25.9 impact score driven by flawless shot creation. The magic faded quickly. During the 12/08 vs PHI matchup, Reaves forced heavily contested jumpers to shoot a miserable 3-for-16 from the floor, resulting in a -5.2 impact score as those wasted possessions actively killed offensive momentum. That erratic play temporarily landed him on the second unit, but he eventually reclaimed his starting job by finding ways to contribute without dominating the ball. Take his performance on 02/22 vs BOS, where he generated a stellar +11.5 impact score despite scoring a modest 15 points on just 4-for-10 shooting. He earned that outsized positive mark through relentless point-of-attack defense and crucial loose-ball recoveries that kept possessions alive, a clear sign he no longer needed a scoring explosion to dictate a game's outcome.

This mid-season stretch was defined by a blistering scoring surge that briefly turned Austin Reaves into a primary offensive engine. He reached his absolute ceiling during the 03/10 vs MIN matchup, pouring in 31 points, seven rebounds, and eight assists to generate a massive +29.7 Impact score. That elite rating was earned through fearless shot creation and a refusal to settle, constantly putting pressure on the rim to break the defense apart. He followed that up with a grueling 46-minute marathon in the 03/14 vs DEN game, dropping 32 points and earning a +19.7 Impact score by efficiently hunting his spots. But even the hottest hands eventually turn to ice. During the 03/16 vs HOU contest, Reaves bricked all eight of his three-point attempts en route to an ugly 5-for-18 shooting night for just 15 points. Despite the offensive nightmare, he still salvaged a +9.4 Impact score because he refused to pout, instead generating winning value by relentlessly chasing loose balls and locking down his perimeter assignments.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Reaves posts positive impact in 78% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~9 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 57% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Reaves consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Performance has dropped off. First-half impact: +14.1, second-half: +8.6. Worth watching whether it's fatigue, injury, or opponents adjusting.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 8 games. Longest cold streak: 3 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 52 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

A. Thompson 72.5 poss
FG% 22.2%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 5
A. Nembhard 57.6 poss
FG% 14.3%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 5
K. George 56.7 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
T. Murphy III 49.8 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 7
D. Mitchell 48.5 poss
FG% 14.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
B. Podziemski 47.5 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 6
J. McDaniels 47.2 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.36
PTS 17
A. Mitchell 40.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
D. DiVincenzo 39.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.23
PTS 9
T. Camara 38.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 6

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. DiVincenzo 75.8 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 62.5%
PPP 0.22
PTS 17
K. George 53.4 poss
FG% 81.8%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.37
PTS 20
J. Fears 47.0 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 12
D. Mitchell 46.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 9
B. Podziemski 39.8 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
S. Bey 38.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 8
T. Eason 37.4 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 9
J. Bouyea 34.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 11
D. Schröder 34.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
A. Nembhard 33.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

51
Games
23.3
PPG
4.7
RPG
5.5
APG
1.1
SPG
0.4
BPG
49.0
FG%
36.0
3P%
87.1
FT%
34.5
MPG

GAME LOG

51 games played