MIL

2025-26 Season

THANASIS ANTETOKOUNMPO

Milwaukee Bucks | Forward | 6-7
Thanasis Antetokounmpo
1.2 PPG
0.9 RPG
0.3 APG
3.7 MPG
+0.2 Impact

Antetokounmpo produces at an average rate for a 4-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+0.2
Scoring +0.6
Points 1.2 PPG × +1.00 = +1.2
Missed 2PT 0.3/g × -0.78 = -0.2
Missed 3PT 0.1/g × -0.87 = -0.1
Missed FT 0.3/g × -1.00 = -0.3
Creation +0.4
Assists 0.3/g × +0.50 = +0.1
Off. Rebounds 0.2/g × +1.26 = +0.3
Turnovers -0.6
Turnovers 0.3/g × -1.95 = -0.6
Defense -0.6
Steals 0.4/g × +2.30 = +0.9
Blocks 0.2/g × +0.90 = +0.2
Def. Rebounds 0.7/g × +0.30 = +0.2
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +0.7
Contested Shots 0.4/g × +0.20 = +0.1
Deflections 0.6/g × +0.65 = +0.4
Loose Balls 0.1/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +0.5
Baseline (game-average expected) −0.3
Net Impact
+0.2
53th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

THE SEASON SO FAR

Thanasis Antetokounmpo's early season was defined entirely by micro-bursts of unbridled, chaotic energy at the end of the bench. He is a pure chaos agent. During a tiny three-minute window on 11/24 vs POR, he generated a massive +6.1 impact score despite scoring just three points. That analytical spike came entirely from his frantic defensive pressure, which rattled opposing ball handlers and yielded a +2.3 defensive rating. However, that same hyperactive motor often sabotaged his metrics. Look at his brief appearance on 01/21 vs OKC. He posted a dismal -2.2 impact score in just two minutes because his erratic energy translated into a wildly rushed, out-of-control missed three-pointer. Even when he actually found the basket for a season-high seven points on 12/06 vs DET, his +1.6 impact was driven by loose-ball dives rather than offensive polish.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Typical consistency. Antetokounmpo is positive more often than not (52% of games) with scoring varying ~2 points from the average.

Average defender. Antetokounmpo doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact +0.7, second-half -0.3. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 72 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

H. González 10.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Koloko 7.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
L. Miller 7.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
R. Williams III 7.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Carter 6.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
G. Bitadze 6.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 2
T. Jemison III 6.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Ingles 6.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 2
S. Cissoko 6.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Garcia 6.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Carter 8.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Diabaté 5.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
N. Penda 5.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.54
PTS 3
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Cain 5.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 2
H. González 5.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
R. Dillingham 4.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
L. Miller 4.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
E. Harkless 4.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.43
PTS 2
J. Ingles 4.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

31
Games
1.2
PPG
0.9
RPG
0.3
APG
0.4
SPG
0.2
BPG
45.8
FG%
0.0
3P%
62.5
FT%
3.7
MPG

GAME LOG

31 games played