MIN

2025-26 Season

JOAN BERINGER

Minnesota Timberwolves | Forward | 6-11
Joan Beringer
3.8PPG
2.3RPG
0.3APG
7.5MPG
-4.5 Impact

Beringer produces at an below average rate for a 8-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-4.5
Scoring +3.5
Points Scored 3.8 PPG = +3.8
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -0.7
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.4
Creation +0.3
Assists & Self-Creation 0.3 AST/g + self-creation = +0.3
Turnovers -0.8
Turnovers 0.3/g (live + dead blend) = -0.8
Defense -0.7
Steals 0.2/g = +0.5
Blocks 0.6/g = +0.5
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.7
Hustle & Effort +2.6
Rebounds 2.3 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +2.0
Contested Shots 2.0/g = +0.4
Deflections 0.2/g = +0.1
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.1/g = +0.0
Screen Assists 0.4/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +4.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.4
Net Impact
-4.5
21st pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 26th
6.3 PPG
Efficiency 66th
58.7% TS
Playmaking 4th
0.5 APG
Rebounding 48th
4.0 RPG
Defense 13th
+4.6/g
Hustle 80th
+16.5/g
Creation 23th
+1.63/g
Shot Making 14th
+2.86/g
TO Discipline 84th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Joan Beringer's early 2025-26 campaign was defined by agonizingly empty garbage-time minutes and an inability to escape the deep end of the bench. Look no further than the 11/04 vs BKN matchup, where a fleeting three-minute appearance yielded a missed shot, a single rebound, and a dismal -10.8 Impact score due to his complete invisibility on the floor. He finally found a brief pulse during the 11/18 vs DAL contest. Despite only scoring six points, Beringer managed a rare +1.3 Impact score during that outing simply by crashing the glass for four rebounds and providing some badly needed physical hustle. Yet even when the ball went through the hoop, his overall value remained suspiciously hollow. During the 01/10 vs CLE game, he scored a highly efficient six points on 3-for-3 shooting in just three minutes, yet still posted a -1.1 Impact score. That negative mark stems from the hidden costs of his game, namely a total lack of playmaking with zero assists and a habit of trading empty baskets in low-leverage moments.

Joan Beringer’s mid-season stretch was defined by a harsh banishment to the deepest depths of the bench. Things actually started with genuine promise on 01/14 vs MIL. Given 30 minutes of run, Beringer generated a stellar +7.7 Impact score by converting a hyper-efficient 6-of-7 shots and battling for five rebounds. However, that coaching trust vanished almost overnight. By 01/17 vs HOU, he was relegated to just six minutes of action, posting a dismal -12.2 Impact score because he provided absolutely zero resistance defensively and failed to score a single point. Even when he managed to score in fleeting appearances later on, his court presence remained actively harmful. During a brief four-minute stint on 02/08 vs LAC, he tallied four points on 2-of-3 shooting, yet still finished with a -5.0 Impact because those empty buckets were entirely offset by costly defensive lapses. You simply cannot survive in a modern NBA rotation when your brief stints bleed points the moment you step on the hardwood.

Joan Beringer spent the bulk of this late-season stretch as a deep-bench afterthought before a sudden promotion to the starting unit triggered a spectacular, unexpected breakout. Early on, Beringer looked completely lost in garbage-time minutes, stumbling to a brutal -10.4 impact score during a brief four-minute stint on 02/20 vs DAL where he failed to grab a single rebound. He languished at the end of the rotation for weeks, bleeding value on the floor because he simply floated through possessions without imposing his physical will. Everything shifted when the coaching staff finally handed him the keys to the frontcourt in April. Given the starting nod on 04/10 vs HOU, Beringer erupted for a +12.8 impact score by playing flawless, highly efficient basketball. He poured in 14 points on a perfect 5-for-5 from the field, anchoring the paint with relentless defensive effort that completely stifled Houston's interior attack. Two days later, he delivered an absolute masterpiece on 04/12 vs NOP. Bullying his way to 24 points and 13 rebounds in 31 minutes, Beringer posted a massive +24.5 impact score by dominating the glass and punishing New Orleans with high-percentage looks around the rim.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Beringer has posted negative impact in 82% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 67% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Average defender. Beringer doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 16 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 65 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. Powell 22.6 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.44
PTS 10
G. Antetokounmpo 15.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 2
V. Wembanyama 15.3 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 4
D. Gafford 14.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 2
L. Kornet 13.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 4
P. Nance 13.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Filipowski 12.4 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 4
B. Portis 11.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.51
PTS 6
A. Drummond 11.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 4
O. Tshiebwe 11.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. Powell 18.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 3
D. Gafford 14.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 4
T. Jackson-Davis 14.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 4
K. Filipowski 14.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 2
K. Kuzma 12.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Drummond 12.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 3
A. Bona 12.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 2
V. Wembanyama 11.9 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.76
PTS 9
O. Tshiebwe 10.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 3
L. Kornet 10.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

44
Games
3.8
PPG
2.3
RPG
0.3
APG
0.2
SPG
0.6
BPG
65.4
FG%
0.0
3P%
71.1
FT%
7.5
MPG

GAME LOG

44 games played