UTA

2025-26 Season

ANDERSSON GARCIA

Utah Jazz | Forward | 6-7
Andersson Garcia
5.2 PPG
8.4 RPG
2.8 APG
33.8 MPG
-4.4 Impact

Garcia produces at an below average rate for a 34-minute workload. Elite defensive value (+4.4/game) is a major strength.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-4.4
Scoring +1.4
Points 5.2 PPG × +1.00 = +5.2
Missed 2PT 1.6/g × -0.78 = -1.3
Missed 3PT 2.4/g × -0.87 = -2.1
Missed FT 0.4/g × -1.00 = -0.4
Creation +4.1
Assists 2.8/g × +0.50 = +1.4
Off. Rebounds 2.1/g × +1.26 = +2.7
Turnovers -2.7
Turnovers 1.4/g × -1.95 = -2.7
Defense +4.4
Steals 1.6/g × +2.30 = +3.7
Blocks 0.8/g × +0.90 = +0.7
Def. Rebounds 6.3/g × +0.30 = +1.9
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +4.7
Contested Shots 4.8/g × +0.20 = +1.0
Deflections 4.0/g × +0.65 = +2.6
Loose Balls 1.0/g × +0.60 = +0.6
Screen Assists 1.6/g × +0.30 = +0.5
Raw Impact +11.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −16.3
Net Impact
-4.4
2th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

Best Game
4 PTS vs MIN
Mar 18 | +3.5 impact
Worst Game
3 PTS vs SAC
Mar 15 | -12.9 impact
PATTERNS

Struggling. Garcia has posted negative impact in 80% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 20% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Defensive difference-maker. Garcia consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -5.9, second-half: -3.4. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 5 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

M. Raynaud 30.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. DeRozan 19.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Portis 16.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Kuzma 16.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Anderson 15.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Avdija 14.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 4
J. Sims 12.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 1
D. Cardwell 11.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. Achiuwa 10.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 3
J. Ingles 9.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

M. Raynaud 19.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
B. Portis 16.5 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 4
D. Plowden 14.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 3
K. Kuzma 14.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Anderson 14.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.42
PTS 6
D. DeRozan 12.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 2
K. Hayes 12.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. Achiuwa 12.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 4
O. Dieng 10.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 3
J. Randle 10.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

5
Games
5.2
PPG
8.4
RPG
2.8
APG
1.6
SPG
0.8
BPG
31.0
FG%
7.7
3P%
77.8
FT%
33.8
MPG

GAME LOG

5 games played

Mar 19 vs MIL
-0.8
7pts 11r 6a 3/6 FG 0/2 3P
Mar 18 vs MIN
+3.5
4pts 8r 3a 1/5 FG 0/2 3P
Mar 15 vs SAC
-12.9
3pts 11r 3a 1/7 FG 1/6 3P
Mar 13 vs POR
-9.4
6pts 3r 2a 2/6 FG 0/3 3P
Mar 11 vs NYK
-2.4
6pts 9r 0a 2/5 FG 0/0 3P