Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
MIA lead ATL lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
ATL 2P — 3P —
MIA 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 196 attempts

ATL ATL Shot-making Δ

Hield Hard 12/18 +12.8
Newell Open 7/13 -0.8
Wallace Hard 2/13 -7.7
Kispert Hard 7/12 +6.2
Dennis Hard 4/10 -0.7
Risacher 5/8 +2.7
Gilbert 4/8 -1.0
Bradley Open 2/6 -3.0
Koloko 1/5 -4.2

MIA MIA Shot-making Δ

Adebayo 11/18 +2.2
Jaquez Jr. 12/17 +5.3
Powell 8/17 +0.4
Ware 6/9 +6.0
Herro Hard 2/9 -4.4
Wiggins Hard 1/9 -7.2
Johnson Open 6/8 +1.4
Mitchell 5/6 +4.9
Jakučionis 3/3 +4.6
Keels 1/3 -1.1
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
ATL
MIA
44/93 Field Goals 58/103
47.3% Field Goal % 56.3%
17/44 3-Pointers 15/37
38.6% 3-Point % 40.5%
12/18 Free Throws 12/17
66.7% Free Throw % 70.6%
58.0% True Shooting % 64.7%
56 Total Rebounds 50
13 Offensive 13
33 Defensive 32
31 Assists 34
1.82 Assist/TO Ratio 4.86
16 Turnovers 6
3 Steals 11
2 Blocks 3
17 Fouls 14
48 Points in Paint 80
8 Fast Break Pts 36
16 Points off TOs 22
13 Second Chance Pts 24
56 Bench Points 81
0 Largest Lead 26
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Bam Adebayo
25 PTS · 10 REB · 3 AST · 29.2 MIN
+32.37
2
Buddy Hield
31 PTS · 3 REB · 3 AST · 21.4 MIN
+28.69
3
Jaime Jaquez Jr.
26 PTS · 1 REB · 5 AST · 25.7 MIN
+24.66
4
Norman Powell
25 PTS · 2 REB · 2 AST · 22.9 MIN
+21.7
5
Keshad Johnson
12 PTS · 4 REB · 3 AST · 25.4 MIN
+18.41
6
Kel'el Ware
16 PTS · 7 REB · 1 AST · 29.2 MIN
+13.97
7
Corey Kispert
21 PTS · 3 REB · 2 AST · 28.6 MIN
+13.93
8
Asa Newell
17 PTS · 11 REB · 2 AST · 38.9 MIN
+13.77
9
Davion Mitchell
12 PTS · 2 REB · 1 AST · 25.7 MIN
+11.17
10
Zaccharie Risacher
11 PTS · 9 REB · 3 AST · 23.9 MIN
+10.3
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:14 T. Keels running reverse Layup (2 PTS) (J. Young 1 AST) 117–143
Q4 0:19 V. Goldin REBOUND (Off:0 Def:2) 117–141
Q4 0:22 MISS A. Newell Layup 117–141
Q4 0:34 V. Goldin Free Throw 1 of 1 (3 PTS) 117–141
Q4 0:34 A. Newell shooting personal FOUL (2 PF) (Goldin 1 FT) 117–140
Q4 0:34 V. Goldin cutting Layup (2 PTS) (M. Gardner 3 AST) 117–140
Q4 0:34 M. Gardner REBOUND (Off:1 Def:1) 117–138
Q4 0:38 MISS T. Keels 26' pullup 3PT 117–138
Q4 0:44 R. Dennis Layup (10 PTS) (K. Gilbert 9 AST) 117–138
Q4 0:52 J. Young 3PT (3 PTS) (M. Gardner 2 AST) 115–138
Q4 1:04 K. Gilbert driving reverse Layup (11 PTS) (R. Dennis 3 AST) 115–135
Q4 1:05 A. Newell REBOUND (Off:4 Def:7) 113–135
Q4 1:07 MISS T. Keels 19' running Shot 113–135
Q4 1:13 T. Keels STEAL (1 STL) 113–135
Q4 1:13 C. Koloko lost ball TURNOVER (3 TO) 113–135

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

MIA Miami Heat
S Kel'el Ware 29.2m
16
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
+7.7

Lethal floor-spacing (+4.8 Shot Making) fueled a highly efficient scoring punch (+12.7) that stretched the opposing defense to its breaking point. Though slightly hampered by minor turnover issues (-2.4), his pattern of solid work on the glass (+3.1 Hustle) ensured a strong positive outing.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 4/5 (80.0%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 81.0%
USG% 16.2%
Net Rtg +11.4
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.2m
Scoring +12.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +3.1
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Bam Adebayo 29.2m
25
pts
10
reb
3
ast
Impact
+28.8

Absolute two-way dominance defined this masterpiece, highlighted by suffocating defensive metrics (+8.1) and flawless ball security (+0.0 Turnovers). He paired elite interior finishing (+4.9 Shot Making) with a relentless rebounding pattern (+7.8 Hustle) to completely dictate the terms of the game.

Shooting
FG 11/18 (61.1%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.3%
USG% 27.1%
Net Rtg +25.4
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.2m
Scoring +18.0
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +4.9
Hustle +7.8
Defense +8.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 27.3%
STL 3
BLK 2
TO 0
S Davion Mitchell 25.7m
12
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.4

A highly efficient scoring burst (+11.0) and excellent shot conversion (+3.1 Shot Making) were nearly entirely wiped out by defensive lapses (-0.8) and a pattern of sloppy play (-2.4 Turnovers). His inability to generate looks for others (+0.0 Creation) left his overall impact hovering right around neutral.

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 12.1%
Net Rtg +24.4
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.7m
Scoring +11.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Andrew Wiggins 25.7m
4
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-8.3

An abysmal scoring output (-1.8) anchored this highly negative performance, as his inability to convert basic looks derailed the offense. While he chipped in slightly on the glass (+2.5 Hustle) and played clean basketball (+0.0 Turnovers), a pattern of complete offensive passivity made him a liability.

Shooting
FG 1/9 (11.1%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 20.2%
USG% 17.2%
Net Rtg +18.9
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.7m
Scoring -1.8
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Tyler Herro 22.3m
5
pts
10
reb
8
ast
Impact
-9.6

A severe pattern of ball-security issues (-4.6 Turnovers) and a complete lack of scoring punch (-0.5) doomed this performance despite solid connective passing (+2.0 Creation). His unusual activity on the boards (+3.0 Hustle) wasn't nearly enough to offset the damage caused by his erratic decision-making.

Shooting
FG 2/9 (22.2%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 27.8%
USG% 23.5%
Net Rtg +20.8
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.3m
Scoring -0.5
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +3.0
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -4.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
26
pts
1
reb
5
ast
Impact
+19.0

A surgical offensive masterclass (+21.8 Scoring) carried this performance, driven by his pattern of consistently draining high-degree-of-difficulty looks (+6.0 Shot Making). Playing a perfectly clean game with zero turnover penalty allowed his scoring efficiency to translate directly to massive positive value.

Shooting
FG 12/17 (70.6%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 72.7%
USG% 27.9%
Net Rtg +31.3
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.7m
Scoring +21.8
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +6.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
12
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+7.7

A pattern of relentless energy on the boards (+5.1 Hustle) and highly efficient finishing (+10.4 Scoring) defined this excellent two-way shift. He added surprising value as a connector (+2.0 Creation) while avoiding any turnover damage (+0.0), perfectly executing his role off the bench.

Shooting
FG 6/8 (75.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 11.9%
Net Rtg +31.1
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.4m
Scoring +10.4
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +5.1
Defense -0.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
25
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+15.2

A blistering scoring barrage (+18.2) anchored this performance, as he established a pattern of routinely punishing the defense by converting tough perimeter looks (+5.2 Shot Making). Flawless ball security (+0.0 Turnovers) ensured that his high-volume shooting translated into highly efficient overall value.

Shooting
FG 8/17 (47.1%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.6%
USG% 33.9%
Net Rtg +13.1
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.9m
Scoring +18.2
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +5.2
Hustle +1.6
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
8
pts
3
reb
5
ast
Impact
-1.7

Despite perfect shooting from the field (+2.2 Shot Making) and solid rebounding effort (+2.8 Hustle), his inability to facilitate (+0.0 Creation) and a pattern of sloppy turnovers (-2.4) dragged him into the red. Minor defensive bleeding (-0.6) further eroded the value of his highly efficient scoring flashes.

Shooting
FG 3/3 (100.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 133.3%
USG% 8.0%
Net Rtg +14.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.5m
Scoring +8.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +2.8
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-8.7

A glaring lack of overall production across a brief stint resulted in a heavily negative baseline impact. While he chipped in slightly on the glass (+1.6 Hustle), a pattern of near-total invisibility as a scoring threat (+1.2) rendered his minutes highly ineffective.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 10.5%
Net Rtg +40.0
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.1m
Scoring +1.2
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +1.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.6

Despite flashing some intense point-of-attack resistance (+2.4 Defense) during a micro-stint, his complete lack of offensive gravity (+0.6 Scoring) tanked his overall rating. A pattern of failing to generate any rebounding or playmaking value left him as a severe net negative.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg +105.6
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.8m
Scoring +0.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.8

Defensive breakdowns (-1.1) in extremely limited action completely erased a modest scoring contribution (+3.0). A clear pattern of failing to make an impact on the glass (+0.6 Hustle) or protect the rim highlighted a highly ineffective bench cameo.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 104.2%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +105.6
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.8m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
3
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.7

A quick perimeter strike (+0.9 Shot Making) wasn't nearly enough to salvage a stint devoid of any defensive or rebounding presence (+0.0 Hustle/Defense). A pattern of low overall volume and zero playmaking (+0.2 Creation) resulted in a heavily penalized baseline score.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +105.6
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.8m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
ATL Atlanta Hawks
S Asa Newell 38.9m
17
pts
11
reb
2
ast
Impact
+10.7

Absolute dominance on the boards (+14.0 Hustle) served as the engine for this highly productive outing. While defensive lapses (-1.4) and a pattern of sloppy decision-making (-4.7 Turnovers) bled some value, his ability to convert difficult looks (+3.2 Shot Making) ensured a massive net positive.

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 57.6%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -20.7
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.9m
Scoring +11.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +14.0
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Keaton Wallace 32.1m
8
pts
4
reb
6
ast
Impact
-14.5

A disastrous defensive showing (-3.4) compounded an incredibly inefficient shooting night, dragging his overall value into the abyss. Even though he managed a slight positive in shot-making (+1.5) on the few looks he did convert, a clear pattern of failing to generate clean offense (-0.5 Scoring) defined this brutal stint.

Shooting
FG 2/13 (15.4%)
3PT 1/8 (12.5%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 27.1%
USG% 19.3%
Net Rtg -40.8
+/- -28
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.1m
Scoring -0.5
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +1.2
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 47.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Corey Kispert 28.6m
21
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.4

Blistering perimeter execution (+5.7 Shot Making) fueled a massive scoring surge (+16.6) that shattered his recent slump. He bled significant value through defensive limitations (-1.6) and sloppy ball control (-4.7 Turnovers), but his pattern of draining highly contested shots carried the night.

Shooting
FG 7/12 (58.3%)
3PT 5/9 (55.6%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 78.8%
USG% 21.1%
Net Rtg -23.7
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.6m
Scoring +16.6
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +5.7
Hustle +1.9
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
11
pts
9
reb
3
ast
Impact
+2.6

Elite work on the glass (+8.5 Hustle) and strong finishing (+2.3 Shot Making) kept his impact firmly in the green despite severe ball-security issues. The costly giveaways (-5.9 Turnover penalty) prevented a monster overall rating, but his relentless rebounding pattern salvaged the performance.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 68.8%
USG% 18.6%
Net Rtg -6.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.9m
Scoring +8.7
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +8.5
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Tony Bradley 21.8m
4
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-3.7

Despite generating solid value on the glass (+6.3 Hustle), his inability to stretch the floor or anchor the defense left him as a net negative. A complete lack of defensive playmaking (+0.0) and a pattern of minimal scoring gravity (+0.8) meant his minutes were largely empty outside of rebounding.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 10.5%
Net Rtg -36.7
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.8m
Scoring +0.8
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +6.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
RayJ Dennis 26.6m
10
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
-11.2

Severe defensive bleeding (-3.4) and a catastrophic pattern of ball-security issues (-5.4 Turnovers) completely erased a respectable offensive showing. While he showed flashes of tough shot conversion (+2.7 Shot Making), the constant mistakes on both ends of the floor made him an active detriment.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg -40.7
+/- -24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.6m
Scoring +5.6
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +2.7
Hustle +0.9
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
11
pts
0
reb
9
ast
Impact
-2.4

Costly giveaways (-4.7 Turnovers) undercut a dynamic offensive performance that otherwise featured excellent scoring (+8.3) and solid defensive activity (+1.8). His ability to create looks for others (+2.3 Creation) showed real promise, but a pattern of erratic decision-making ultimately dragged his impact into the red.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.0%
USG% 16.9%
Net Rtg -19.6
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.5m
Scoring +8.3
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +0.0
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Buddy Hield 21.4m
31
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+25.1

An absolute masterclass in perimeter execution (+8.7 Shot Making) drove an overwhelming offensive output (+26.6 Scoring) that broke the game wide open. He supplemented the scoring barrage with surprisingly stout defensive activity (+2.4), establishing a pattern of two-way terror when his jumper is fully dialed in.

Shooting
FG 12/18 (66.7%)
3PT 7/11 (63.6%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 86.1%
USG% 34.5%
Net Rtg -1.1
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.4m
Scoring +26.6
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +8.7
Hustle +0.9
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 63.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
4
pts
8
reb
1
ast
Impact
-14.4

A staggering turnover penalty (-7.8) completely sabotaged what could have been a productive interior shift. His relentless work on the glass (+8.2 Hustle) was entirely negated by defensive breakdowns (-2.9) and a glaring pattern of failing to protect the basketball in traffic.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 29.6%
USG% 18.9%
Net Rtg -36.2
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.2m
Scoring -1.3
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +8.2
Defense -2.9
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3