GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Share Post

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

HOU Houston Rockets
S Jae'Sean Tate 26.2m
13
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+2.8

A frenetic, high-motor shift yielded massive dividends on the glass (+7.6 Hustle) and in defensive disruption (+2.4). However, his chaotic energy frequently spilled over into reckless offensive execution, racking up severe penalties for careless giveaways (-7.8 Turnover cost). This was a classic high-variance outing where his sheer effort barely outpaced his lack of polish.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.9%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg +22.5
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.2m
Scoring +10.4
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +7.6
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Reed Sheppard 25.9m
19
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+7.5

Elite perimeter shot-making (+5.2) and flawless ball security (+0.0 Turnover cost) anchored a highly efficient offensive shift. He supplemented his scoring punch by playing passing lanes and blowing up actions at the point of attack (+2.9 Defense). Operating with surgical precision, he systematically dismantled defensive rotations without ever forcing the issue.

Shooting
FG 7/18 (38.9%)
3PT 4/12 (33.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.3%
USG% 26.0%
Net Rtg +34.0
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.9m
Scoring +9.7
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +5.2
Hustle +1.2
Defense +2.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
S Tari Eason 23.8m
20
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
+7.1

Relentless activity on the glass (+5.3 Hustle) and a barrage of high-difficulty conversions (+3.6 Shot Making) powered a dominant offensive showing. While his aggressive drives occasionally resulted in wild giveaways (-4.7 Turnover cost), his sheer physical force overwhelmed defenders in the paint. He completely abandoned his recent perimeter slump to bully his way to the rim.

Shooting
FG 8/17 (47.1%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.6%
USG% 29.0%
Net Rtg +42.2
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.8m
Scoring +14.0
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +5.3
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Clint Capela 23.0m
23
pts
13
reb
1
ast
Impact
+27.5

Absolute dominance in the painted area defined this masterclass, highlighted by a staggering rebounding output (+13.6 Hustle). He feasted on drop-off passes and putbacks, generating massive scoring value (+19.8) without committing a single turnover. This performance was a brutal reminder of his ability to completely tilt the geometry of the floor through sheer physical force.

Shooting
FG 9/11 (81.8%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 4/7 (57.1%)
Advanced
TS% 81.7%
USG% 21.5%
Net Rtg +48.9
+/- +24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.0m
Scoring +19.8
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +13.6
Defense +1.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 3
TO 0
S Josh Okogie 21.9m
3
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-10.7

Despite providing his signature point-of-attack disruption (+2.6 Defense) and rebounding energy (+3.1 Hustle), his complete lack of offensive gravity cratered his overall impact. A brutal inability to finish plays (-2.1 Scoring) allowed defenders to aggressively pack the paint and ignore him on the perimeter. His defensive utility simply could not mask the spacing issues he created on the other end.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 11.3%
Net Rtg +47.8
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.9m
Scoring -2.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +3.1
Defense +2.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
JD Davison 26.4m
9
pts
10
reb
7
ast
Impact
+6.7

A masterful display of rebounding (+8.8 Hustle) and flawless ball security (+0.0 Turnover cost) defined this highly impactful shift. He consistently collapsed the defense to generate high-value looks for teammates (+3.5 Creation) while remaining a disruptive force in passing lanes (+3.4 Defense). This was a brilliant, low-mistake outing that perfectly highlighted his connective playmaking.

Shooting
FG 2/9 (22.2%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 38.7%
USG% 17.4%
Net Rtg +36.2
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.4m
Scoring +3.1
Creation +3.5
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +8.8
Defense +3.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 0
Jeff Green 24.2m
6
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-12.7

Catastrophic ball security (-7.1 Turnover cost) completely derailed his minutes, turning the veteran into an active liability. While he managed to scrap for a few loose balls (+4.4 Hustle), his inability to initiate offense or space the floor effectively stalled out multiple possessions. He looked a step slow against defensive pressure, routinely coughing up the ball in traffic.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 33.8%
USG% 17.4%
Net Rtg +14.4
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.2m
Scoring +1.6
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +4.4
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 27.8%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 3
9
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.6

A steady, mistake-free shift (+0.0 Turnover cost) allowed him to tread water despite a relatively quiet offensive night. He generated subtle value through timely rotations (+2.1 Defense) and opportunistic rebounding (+2.5 Hustle), perfectly executing his role as a low-maintenance connector. While he didn't break the game open, his disciplined two-way execution stabilized the second unit.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.7%
USG% 15.3%
Net Rtg +51.1
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.0m
Scoring +5.2
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +2.5
Defense +2.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
7
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-4.1

Pesky on-ball pressure (+3.2 Defense) kept him engaged, but erratic decision-making (-2.4 Turnover cost) ultimately dragged his impact into the red. He flashed some ability to hit contested jumpers (+1.9 Shot Making), yet struggled to consistently organize the offense when pressured. The defensive intensity was there, but the offensive execution remained too volatile.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 71.7%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +41.2
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.8m
Scoring +4.9
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.9
Defense +3.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
11
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+2.6

A sudden surge of aggressive interior play and relentless rebounding (+7.6 Hustle) fueled a highly productive scoring burst (+9.4). He routinely bullied his way to extra possessions, completely abandoning his recent perimeter passivity to attack the paint. While defensive lapses (-1.6) slightly muted his overall impact, his sheer physical force off the bench was undeniable.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 79.9%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -23.5
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.8m
Scoring +9.4
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +7.6
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
12
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.0

Flawless execution and tough shot-making (+3.1) allowed him to maximize a brief cameo. He generated positive value across the board, combining disruptive defensive rotations (+2.4) with zero giveaways (+0.0 Turnover cost). His ability to instantly adapt to the game's rhythm provided a crucial, stabilizing spark off the bench.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 58.1%
USG% 34.5%
Net Rtg +8.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.0m
Scoring +7.1
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +2.8
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
MEM Memphis Grizzlies
S Rayan Rupert 41.6m
21
pts
12
reb
5
ast
Impact
+6.5

Catastrophic ball security (-13.0 Turnover cost) nearly sabotaged an otherwise dominant two-way performance. He salvaged his overall impact (+6.5) through sheer volume, overwhelming matchups inside to rack up massive scoring (+15.7) and rebounding (+11.4 Hustle) marks. If he cleans up the careless giveaways, this erratic downhill aggression could become a reliable weapon.

Shooting
FG 8/15 (53.3%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.3%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg -25.3
+/- -24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 41.6m
Scoring +15.7
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +4.7
Hustle +11.4
Defense -1.0
Turnovers -13.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 22
FGM Against 14
Opp FG% 63.6%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 6
S Toby Okani 40.9m
6
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.6

Despite generating solid value on the glass (+4.0 Hustle), a glaring lack of offensive punch doomed his overall impact (-6.6). A continued perimeter slump resulted in negligible scoring credit (+0.4) despite heavy rotational minutes. He simply could not punish defensive rotations, turning him into an active liability in the half-court.

Shooting
FG 3/10 (30.0%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 30.0%
USG% 10.4%
Net Rtg -25.9
+/- -24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.9m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +4.0
Defense -0.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 52.4%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 0
S Dariq Whitehead 39.2m
26
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+10.1

Lethal perimeter execution drove a massive offensive rating, as his shot-making bonus (+6.5) highlighted his ability to convert highly contested looks. This scoring eruption (+18.2) easily masked his sluggish rotations on the other end of the floor (-3.1 Defense). He operated as a pure scoring specialist, punishing drop coverages and late closeouts all night.

Shooting
FG 11/21 (52.4%)
3PT 4/11 (36.4%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 61.9%
USG% 23.3%
Net Rtg -14.3
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.2m
Scoring +18.2
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +6.5
Hustle +1.2
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 45.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Jahmai Mashack 38.4m
11
pts
1
reb
11
ast
Impact
-15.0

Sloppy decision-making (-7.1 Turnover cost) and defensive breakdowns (-4.6) completely unraveled his effectiveness as a primary initiator. Despite flashing some ability to hit difficult shots (+3.2 Shot Making), his erratic passing and poor point-of-attack containment bled value on both ends. This outing highlighted the stark growing pains of his expanded on-ball role.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 2/9 (22.2%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.2%
USG% 16.3%
Net Rtg -38.6
+/- -32
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.4m
Scoring +4.8
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +0.3
Defense -4.6
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 12.5%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 3
S Taj Gibson 19.1m
4
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.5

A complete inability to anchor the paint defensively (-3.4) cratered his short stint on the floor. While he managed to scrap for extra possessions (+5.1 Hustle), his heavy legs were routinely exposed in pick-and-roll coverage. The veteran simply bled too much value on the defensive end to justify his limited offensive utility.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.0%
USG% 10.6%
Net Rtg -23.1
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.1m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +5.1
Defense -3.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
15
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+0.2

A balanced two-way effort kept him above water, anchored by disruptive point-of-attack coverage (+3.6 Defense). He managed to offset a string of careless giveaways (-4.7 Turnover cost) by converting tough looks from the perimeter (+3.3 Shot Making). His ability to toggle between defensive stopper and opportunistic spacer stabilized the rotation during choppy stretches.

Shooting
FG 5/14 (35.7%)
3PT 3/10 (30.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.4%
USG% 20.7%
Net Rtg -39.6
+/- -31
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.9m
Scoring +8.2
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +1.8
Defense +3.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 2
Javon Small 25.8m
18
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.6

Aggressive on-ball defense (+4.7) and high-level shot creation (+4.2 Shot Making) fueled a highly productive two-way shift. While a few reckless decisions in traffic dragged down his efficiency (-4.7 Turnover cost), his ability to consistently hit tough jumpers kept the offense afloat. He operated as a volatile but necessary sparkplug against stagnant half-court coverages.

Shooting
FG 7/19 (36.8%)
3PT 2/10 (20.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 45.3%
USG% 35.5%
Net Rtg -41.4
+/- -24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.8m
Scoring +9.5
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +1.9
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2