CLE

2025-26 Season

LUKE TRAVERS

Cleveland Cavaliers | Forward | 6-6
Luke Travers
2.3 PPG
2.0 RPG
0.8 APG
8.6 MPG
-0.5 Impact

Travers produces at an average rate for a 9-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-0.5
Scoring +0.5
Points 2.3 PPG × +1.00 = +2.3
Missed 2PT 1.0/g × -0.78 = -0.8
Missed 3PT 1.2/g × -0.87 = -1.0
Missed FT 0.0/g × -1.00 = -0.0
Creation +1.0
Assists 0.8/g × +0.50 = +0.4
Off. Rebounds 0.5/g × +1.26 = +0.6
Turnovers -0.4
Turnovers 0.2/g × -1.95 = -0.4
Defense +0.2
Steals 0.6/g × +2.30 = +1.4
Blocks 0.3/g × +0.90 = +0.3
Def. Rebounds 1.5/g × +0.30 = +0.4
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.1
Contested Shots 1.4/g × +0.20 = +0.3
Deflections 0.9/g × +0.65 = +0.6
Loose Balls 0.2/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.2/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Raw Impact +2.4
Baseline (game-average expected) −2.9
Net Impact
-0.5
44th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 2th
2.8 PPG
Efficiency 2th
38.7% TS
Playmaking 18th
0.9 APG
Rebounding 13th
2.4 RPG
Rim Protection 90th
0.21/min
Hustle 72th
0.12/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 86th
0.03/min

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Steady role player. Travers's impact doesn't swing much in absolute terms, and he's positive in 58% of games. You know what you're getting.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Travers locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact -0.8, second-half -0.3. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 19 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Battle 11.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 2
C. Lanier 9.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
S. Fontecchio 8.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.47
PTS 4
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Sanders 7.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
G. Dick 7.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.42
PTS 3
B. Ingram 6.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Paul 6.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Johnson 6.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.66
PTS 4
G. Mathews 5.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

W. Riley 12.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
G. Dick 10.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 2
J. Battle 10.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 3
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.6
PTS 5
C. Lanier 8.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
N. Batum 6.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
L. Waters III 6.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Wiggins 5.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. Larsson 5.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Paul 5.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

12
Games
2.3
PPG
2.0
RPG
0.8
APG
0.6
SPG
0.3
BPG
25.0
FG%
6.2
3P%
100.0
FT%
8.6
MPG