2025-26 Season
JAE'SEAN TATE
2025-26 Season
JAE'SEAN TATE
Tate produces at an poor rate for a 8-minute workload.
Tate produces at an poor rate for a 8-minute workload.
PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology
TEAM COMPARISON
of 12 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
Similar Players
Same position, closest production profile this season.
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Jae'Sean Tate spent the first 16 games of the 2025-26 season battling irrelevance at the very end of the bench. He struggled to find any rhythm in sporadic minutes, often bleeding value when he actually touched the floor. Look at his extended run on 12/06 vs PHX. Despite scoring a season-high eight points in 19 minutes, he posted a dismal -6.8 Impact score because his floor time was plagued by defensive lapses and empty-calorie production. Quick cameos frequently ended in disaster, like his brief two-minute shift on 11/20 vs CLE that yielded an abysmal -12.2 Impact. Yet, Tate occasionally flashed his gritty utility when given a real chance to crash the glass. During a 13-minute stint on 12/02 vs UTA, he managed just six points but grabbed six rebounds, generating a +5.4 Impact by doing the physical, non-scoring dirty work in the trenches.
This stretch of the season was defined by Jae'Sean Tate's desperate struggle to stay relevant at the end of the bench. His minutes were mostly empty, highlighted by a brutal outing on 01/14 vs CHI where he missed both his field goals and recorded a dismal -12.8 Impact score in just five minutes. Even when given an extended run, he failed to find an offensive rhythm. During a 19-minute shift on 01/29 vs ATL, Tate managed just four points on clunky 2-of-6 shooting, resulting in a -6.2 Impact score as his severe offensive limitations completely outweighed his hustle. His lone bright spot came on 02/02 vs IND, where he hit all four of his field goal attempts for a stretch-high eight points. Yet, despite that perfect shooting night, his overall presence still yielded a -1.1 Impact score, reflecting the hidden costs of defensive lapses and a total lack of playmaking. He is an energy guy who simply isn't generating enough positive momentum to justify meaningful rotation minutes.
Jae'Sean Tate spent the late winter and early spring of the 2025-26 season marooned at the end of the rotation, battling irrelevance in a string of empty-calorie cameos. During a brutal 04/01 vs MIL appearance, he posted a dismal -14.4 Impact score after failing to record a single counting stat in three minutes of pure cardio. His brief stints were consistently dragged down by offensive invisibility and a complete inability to generate secondary statistics. Even when he found the bottom of the net on 02/19 vs CHA, hitting three of his four shots for seven points, his Impact still sat in the red at -1.8 because he failed to secure a single rebound. Relief finally arrived when he was thrust into the starting lineup on 04/12 vs MEM. Given a massive 26-minute leash, Tate racked up 13 points and six boards, earning a +2.8 Impact score by pairing efficient finishing with relentless hustle and defensive disruption. Unfortunately, that lone bright spot was a jarring anomaly in a stretch where his aggressive energy rarely translated into winning basketball.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Struggling. Tate has posted negative impact in 92% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 67% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact -6.5, second-half -7.3. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.
Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 1 games. Longest cold streak: 29 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago
Based on 60 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
51 games played