January 21, 2026
EXPLORE THE GAME
Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.
SAS
2P —
3P —
HOU
2P —
3P —
SAS
HOU
SAS
PLAYER PERFORMANCE
Houston Rockets
Despite highly efficient shot-making, a surprisingly negative impact (-5.2) suggests his minutes were plagued by poor transition defense and empty possessions. He failed to dictate the offensive tempo, allowing the opposition to dictate matchups and trap him on the perimeter. The scoring efficiency was essentially hollowed out by defensive bleeding during his extended shifts.
Spectacular point-of-attack defense was entirely undone by cramped offensive spacing and forced rim attempts, yielding a -2.4 net score. Opposing bigs blatantly ignored him on the perimeter, packing the paint and short-circuiting the team's primary actions. The resulting half-court stagnation negated his relentless defensive ball pressure.
A failure to anchor the weakside defense effectively dragged his overall rating into the red (-1.9) despite a solid offensive rhythm. Opponents consistently targeted his closeouts, turning his defensive hesitations into high-value corner threes. The smooth jump-shooting could not fully compensate for the structural leaks he allowed on the other end.
Operating as the ultimate offensive hub, his brilliant high-post processing fueled a dominant +8.2 net impact. He systematically dismantled double-teams by finding cutters, while simultaneously anchoring the paint with exceptional positional defense. His ability to control the game's geometry from the elbows defined the team's half-court success.
A lack of offensive gravity severely restricted the floor spacing during his shifts, resulting in a negative -2.5 impact score. Even with perfect shooting on minimal attempts, defenders freely sagged off him to aggressively stunt driving lanes. His localized hustle plays simply couldn't overcome the geometric disadvantage he created on offense.
A devastating combination of disruptive passing-lane defense and lethal perimeter shot-making fueled a massive +12.9 net impact. He consistently turned deflections into immediate transition opportunities, breaking the opponent's defensive shell before it could set. His aggressive pull-up shooting punished drop coverages and completely dictated the tempo of the game.
Intermittent defensive lapses and a failure to secure contested loose balls contributed to a sluggish -3.1 impact rating. He struggled to find an offensive rhythm in the dunker spot, leading to disrupted spacing and stalled possessions. Without his usual chaotic energy generating extra possessions, his overall value plummeted.
Complete offensive invisibility and a lack of defensive resistance resulted in a steep -4.8 impact drop during his brief stint. He failed to punish late closeouts, allowing the opposing defense to comfortably overload the strong side of the floor. His inability to contain dribble penetration further compounded the negative swing.
Hard rolls to the rim and vertical spacing completely changed the offensive dynamic, driving a highly efficient +3.6 impact in limited action. He weaponized his size in the pick-and-roll, forcing the weakside tagger to commit early and open up corner shooters. This focused interior presence stabilized the second unit during a crucial stretch.
San Antonio Spurs
Elite point-of-attack defense and relentless loose-ball recoveries salvaged a positive impact (+0.4) despite a disastrous shooting performance. Wasted offensive possessions from forced drives were completely offset by his ability to blow up opposing pick-and-rolls. His sheer motor kept him on the floor when his scoring touch vanished.
A blistering perimeter barrage drove his massive +12.7 impact score, as he consistently punished defensive rotations with high-value outside shots. The sheer volume of his three-point attempts warped Houston's defensive shell and opened up driving lanes for teammates. His floor-spacing effectively neutralized interior help defenders throughout the contest.
Poor shot selection and an inability to break down the primary point-of-attack defense resulted in a steep -9.9 overall impact. Stagnant offensive possessions frequently ended in heavily contested mid-range pull-ups rather than high-value rim attempts. This lack of downhill pressure allowed the opposing defense to stay comfortably set in the half-court.
Severe offensive inefficiency completely derailed his net impact (-6.9), largely stemming from a heavy reliance on contested perimeter jumpers. By settling for outside looks instead of establishing deep post position, he bailed out Houston's frontcourt. Even his usually dominant rim protection metrics flatlined, compounding the damage of his empty offensive possessions.
Despite holding up reasonably well in individual defensive assignments, his overall impact cratered (-6.2) due to extreme offensive passivity. A failure to capitalize on spot-up opportunities allowed perimeter defenders to cheat into the paint. He essentially became an offensive non-factor, stalling San Antonio's half-court execution.
Relentless downhill aggression and stout physical defense translated into a robust +6.1 impact score. By abandoning the perimeter to attack the basket, he generated high-percentage looks and collapsed the opposing defensive shell. His ability to absorb contact on drives consistently compromised the opponent's interior structure.
High-level rim deterrence and flawless execution as a roll man fueled a highly efficient +7.7 net rating. He maximized his minutes by strictly adhering to his role, converting easy lob opportunities and avoiding empty offensive possessions. His vertical spacing consistently forced the weakside defense into difficult rotation choices.
A complete lack of perimeter gravity dragged his overall impact into the negative (-3.4), as defenders routinely went under screens against him. Without the threat of an outside shot, his driving lanes evaporated and bogged down the second-unit offense. Solid rotational defense wasn't enough to overcome his spacing limitations.
Defensive lapses during a brief rotation stint resulted in a quick -2.8 net impact. Missed weakside rotations and an inability to stay in front of his man bled points during his minutes on the floor. The minor scoring bump he provided couldn't mask the structural damage to the team's defensive integrity.
