MIN

2025-26 Season

JOHNNY JUZANG

Minnesota Timberwolves | Guard | 6-7
Johnny Juzang
2.0PPG
0.8RPG
0.3APG
4.2MPG
-6.6 Impact

Juzang produces at an poor rate for a 4-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-6.6
Scoring +1.7
Points Scored 2.0 PPG = +2.0
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -0.8
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.5
Creation +0.1
Assists & Self-Creation 0.3 AST/g + self-creation = +0.1
Turnovers -0.6
Turnovers 0.2/g (live + dead blend) = -0.6
Hustle & Effort +0.5
Rebounds 0.8 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.2
Contested Shots 0.6/g = +0.1
Deflections 0.3/g = +0.2
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.1/g = +0.0
Screen Assists 0.1/g = +0.0
Raw Impact +1.7
Baseline (game-average expected) −8.3
Net Impact
-6.6
9th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

THE SEASON SO FAR

Johnny Juzang’s opening stretch of the 2025-26 campaign was defined by sheer irrelevance, as he languished at the absolute end of the bench logging empty garbage-time minutes. He looked completely passive during these brief cameos. During a five-minute run on 11/08 vs UTA, he failed to attempt a single shot or grab a rebound, resulting in a dismal -9.8 Impact score due to his total lack of floor engagement. His worst outing came earlier on 10/27 vs DEN, where a scoreless three-minute stint yielded a staggering -10.3 Impact score simply because he was a complete non-factor on both ends of the court. Even when he actually found the bottom of the net, his overall value remained deeply negative. For instance, despite hitting a quick three-pointer in just one minute of action on 11/01 vs CHA, his Impact score still sat at -5.6. This negative mark despite perfect shooting reveals the hidden costs of his minutes, as he bleeds value by offering absolutely zero playmaking, rebounding, or defensive resistance while on the hardwood.

Johnny Juzang's mid-season stretch was defined by desperate, erratic attempts to shoot his way out of the deep end of the bench. On 01/07 vs MIA, he logged a disastrous -9.1 impact score. That abysmal rating stemmed directly from atrocious shot selection, as he hoisted and bricked three wild attempts in just five scoreless minutes while offering absolutely zero playmaking. He occasionally found the bottom of the net, notably catching fire on 12/31 vs ATL for 10 points on crisp 4-of-6 shooting. That brief offensive explosion earned him a +2.4 impact score, driven entirely by his ability to finally knock down open perimeter looks and grab a few loose rebounds. Yet even when he generated instant offense, his overall floor game remained a massive liability. On 01/04 vs WAS, Juzang poured in 6 points in just 9 minutes, but he still generated a miserable -5.8 impact score because of the hidden costs of defensive lapses and a complete failure to distribute the basketball.

Johnny Juzang’s mid-season stretch was defined by fleeting, empty minutes at the absolute fringes of the rotation. He was essentially a ghost on the hardwood. During a brief appearance on 02/04 vs TOR, Juzang logged a staggering -17.1 impact score in a mere two minutes of action. That abysmal rating stems directly from his total lack of engagement, as he missed his only shot and failed to record a single counting stat before returning to the bench. Even when he managed to generate a sliver of offense, like his four-point outing on 01/10 vs CLE, the underlying metrics remained firmly negative. He posted three points over ten minutes on 02/06 vs NOP, yet still dragged the lineup down with a -7.1 impact. His inability to string together defensive stops, force turnovers, or create for teammates meant that hitting a lone three-pointer simply could not mask his overall passivity.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Juzang has posted negative impact in 95% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact -5.8, second-half -7.3. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.

In a rough stretch — 9 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 11 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 50 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

T. Murphy III 10.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Branham 9.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 2
N. Clifford 8.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
L. Kennard 7.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.67
PTS 5
A. Johnson 5.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.74
PTS 4
P. Nance 5.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 2
A. Dosunmu 4.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
I. Collier 4.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Gardner 4.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. Spencer 4.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

B. McGowens 11.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Ellis 5.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.85
PTS 5
M. Branham 5.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Proctor 5.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 2
A. Johnson 5.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
W. Riley 5.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 2
C. Anthony 4.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
S. Fontecchio 4.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Murphy III 4.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.7
PTS 3
I. Collier 4.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

21
Games
2.0
PPG
0.8
RPG
0.3
APG
0.1
SPG
0.0
BPG
42.1
FG%
25.0
3P%
62.5
FT%
4.2
MPG

GAME LOG

21 games played