NYK

2025-26 Season

PACÔME DADIET

New York Knicks | Forward | 6-9
Pacôme Dadiet
1.8PPG
1.0RPG
0.4APG
4.9MPG
-6.5 Impact

Dadiet produces at an poor rate for a 5-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-6.5
Scoring +1.4
Points Scored 1.8 PPG = +1.8
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -0.8
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.4
Creation +0.1
Assists & Self-Creation 0.4 AST/g + self-creation = +0.1
Turnovers -0.3
Turnovers 0.1/g (live + dead blend) = -0.3
Defense +0.1
Steals 0.1/g = +0.2
Blocks 0.0/g = +0.0
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -0.1
Hustle & Effort +0.6
Rebounds 1.0 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.3
Contested Shots 0.3/g = +0.1
Deflections 0.3/g = +0.2
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.1/g = +0.0
Screen Assists 0.0/g = +0.0
Raw Impact +1.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −8.4
Net Impact
-6.5
6th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 14th
4.7 PPG
Efficiency 10th
48.8% TS
Playmaking 7th
0.6 APG
Rebounding 2th
1.5 RPG
Defense 3th
+2.4/g
Hustle 3th
+4.1/g
Creation 1th
+0.68/g
Shot Making 15th
+3.00/g
TO Discipline 94th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Pacôme Dadiet's first ten games of the 2025-26 season were defined by absolute irrelevance at the end of the bench. He spent this stretch accumulating either DNP-CDs or meaningless garbage-time cardio. On 11/03 vs CHI, he logged exactly zero minutes while registering a baseline -7.0 impact. Even when handed a slightly longer leash, he completely failed to capitalize. During his six minutes on 11/09 vs BKN, Dadiet scraped together just two points despite missing both of his field goal attempts, earning a -6.8 impact because of his inability to generate clean looks or run a functional offense. His metrics plummeted even further on 11/22 vs ORL. In that brief appearance, a brutal -9.7 impact stemmed directly from poor shot selection and a complete lack of hustle plays across three empty minutes.

Pacôme Dadiet spent this ten-game stretch marooned at the end of the rotation, offering nothing but empty minutes during brief garbage-time cameos. When handed a longer leash of 11 minutes on 12/24 vs MIN, he looked entirely out of his depth. He missed both of his field goal attempts and posted an abysmal -12.5 impact score because he failed to generate any offensive pressure or defensive resistance. A rare bright spot arrived on 02/06 vs DET. Despite a messy 1-for-4 shooting line, Dadiet scraped together a +0.9 impact mark in seven minutes by finally knocking down a three-pointer and grabbing a rebound to keep the floor spaced. That minor blip of productivity was the exception to a bleak rule, perfectly captured by his appearance on 01/08 vs LAC. He logged a staggering -10.1 impact score in just one single minute of action, bleeding value by being a completely passive, invisible body on the court who failed to record a single counting stat.

Pacôme Dadiet’s late-season stretch was defined by erratic bench minutes and a frustrating shooting slump. He initially looked like a lethal sparkplug on 03/06 vs DEN. In just nine minutes, he drilled all three of his attempts from deep to post a +6.5 Impact score. That hot hand vanished immediately. On 03/22 vs WAS, rushed shot selection and zero counting stats resulted in a dismal -13.2 Impact score across four completely hollow minutes. He finally earned an extended look on 04/12 vs CHA, logging 27 minutes. Despite clanking four of his five perimeter attempts in that contest, his active rebounding and overall energy managed to yield a +2.0 Impact score.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Dadiet has posted negative impact in 88% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -8.0, second-half: -5.0. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 1 games. Longest cold streak: 18 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 55 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

L. Miller 11.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Huerter 10.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.49
PTS 5
Z. Nnaji 9.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.53
PTS 5
J. Walker 8.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 2
T. Martin 7.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Edwards 7.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Brown 6.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 2
J. Wilson 5.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Lanier 4.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.41
PTS 2
M. Sasser 4.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

L. Miller 10.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 2
D. Holmes II 9.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 3
J. Walker 7.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Wilson 7.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Brown 6.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 2
T. Martin 6.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 2
D. DiVincenzo 5.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Sasser 5.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Huerter 5.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Lanier 5.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

34
Games
1.8
PPG
1.0
RPG
0.4
APG
0.1
SPG
0.0
BPG
37.3
FG%
24.3
3P%
81.8
FT%
4.9
MPG

GAME LOG

34 games played