2025-26 Season
XAVIER TILLMAN
2025-26 Season
XAVIER TILLMAN
Tillman produces at an poor rate for a 6-minute workload.
Tillman produces at an poor rate for a 6-minute workload.
PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology
TEAM COMPARISON
of 17 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
Similar Players
Same position, closest production profile this season.
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Xavier Tillman’s early season was defined by a frustrating battle against irrelevance at the deep end of the bench. He spent most nights logging brief, empty cardio sessions that actively dragged down his advanced metrics. Look no further than 12/05 vs WAS, where he wandered through five scoreless minutes to register a catastrophic -14.9 impact score simply by failing to generate any tangible box score stats. Yet, when thrust into a sudden starting role on 11/30 vs CLE, he logged 30 minutes and posted a +5.9 impact score despite scoring just 9 points. That positive rating stemmed entirely from his rugged interior effort, as he pulled down 6 rebounds and provided the gritty physical anchor the unit desperately needed. Unfortunately, that flash of utility was short-lived. He immediately returned to garbage-time duty, managing just two points in three minutes on 12/06 vs LAL for a dismal -7.2 impact.
Xavier Tillman’s mid-season stretch was defined by absolute offensive invisibility and garbage-time banishment. He was essentially a ghost on the hardwood. During the 01/18 vs ATL matchup, he logged five empty minutes and missed his only shot attempt, generating a dismal -12.8 impact score. That severe negative rating stems directly from his complete failure to register basic counting stats, rendering him a total non-threat who dragged down lineup efficiency. The futility peaked on 02/22 vs WAS. In just four minutes of action, he posted a staggering -13.9 impact score while failing to score a single point. Even when he finally secured two points and three rebounds during a seven-minute appearance on 02/24 vs CHI, poor perimeter shot selection kept his impact at a negative -6.2. Missing both of his three-point attempts in that contest reveals a fringe big man pressing for relevance instead of sticking to high-percentage interior looks.
Xavier Tillman spent this ten-game stretch anchored to the deep bench, serving as an afterthought rather than a viable rotation piece. Even when handed a rare 17 minutes on 04/03 vs IND, he managed just two points and generated a dismal -9.0 Impact score because his minimal rebounding and total lack of scoring aggression dragged down the unit. A brief cameo on 03/29 vs BOS yielded an even worse -11.3 Impact score in just four minutes. That disastrous rating stemmed from entirely empty cardio and a missed perimeter shot that killed the team's offensive spacing. He was functionally invisible. Tillman did manage to scrape together four points on perfect shooting during a two-minute stint on 04/05 vs MIN, but his -2.1 Impact score revealed the defensive apathy that accompanied those garbage-time buckets. When a big man cannot command offensive attention or protect the rim, his minutes become a severe liability.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Struggling. Tillman has posted negative impact in 97% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.
Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Tillman locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.
Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact -6.7, second-half -7.1. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.
In a rough stretch — 22 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 22 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago
Based on 73 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
31 games played