LAL

2025-26 Season

DREW TIMME

Los Angeles Lakers | Forward | 6-9
Drew Timme
3.4PPG
1.2RPG
0.9APG
8.7MPG
-6.2 Impact

Timme produces at an poor rate for a 9-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-6.2
Scoring +3.8
Points Scored 3.4 PPG = +3.4
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -0.5
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.9
Creation +0.2
Assists & Self-Creation 0.9 AST/g + self-creation = +0.2
Turnovers -1.3
Turnovers 0.5/g (live + dead blend) = -1.3
Defense -0.4
Steals 0.2/g = +0.5
Blocks 0.0/g = +0.0
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -0.9
Hustle & Effort +1.0
Rebounds 1.2 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.3
Contested Shots 1.4/g = +0.3
Deflections 0.2/g = +0.1
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.1
Loose Balls 0.1/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.4/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +3.3
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.5
Net Impact
-6.2
7th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 17th
5.2 PPG
Efficiency 30th
53.2% TS
Playmaking 39th
1.4 APG
Rebounding 4th
1.8 RPG
Defense 17th
+4.7/g
Hustle 1th
+3.8/g
Creation 13th
+1.40/g
Shot Making 48th
+5.66/g
TO Discipline 29th
0.06/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Drew Timme’s early 2025-26 campaign was defined by weeks of agonizing garbage-time cameos interrupted by one sudden, explosive breakout. For the first month, he languished at the end of the bench, logging empty minutes that dragged his advanced metrics into the abyss. Look at the 12/29 vs SAC matchup. A nearly invisible three minutes yielded zero shot attempts, zero assists, and a brutal -12.2 impact score simply because he generated absolutely no tangible value while on the floor. Everything flipped during a massive workload increase on 01/18 vs POR. Given 29 minutes, Timme erupted for 21 points and four assists on blistering 9-of-12 shooting, earning a +11.5 impact score driven by stellar shot selection and highly efficient finishing. The magic faded quickly, however. During the 01/19 vs TOR game the very next night, he managed just three points on 1-of-4 shooting across 16 minutes, suffering a -5.0 impact score as his offensive rhythm completely evaporated.

Drew Timme's mid-season stretch was an agonizing fight to stay relevant on an NBA floor. He looked completely lost during a brief outing on 01/23 vs LAC. Despite playing 10 minutes, he failed to attempt a single field goal and posted a dreadful -12.8 impact score because his hesitant shot selection rendered him offensively invisible. The coaching staff gave him a longer leash on 01/30 vs WAS, but he remained a glaring liability. His extreme passivity yielded just four points, and his poor defensive effort dragged the team down to a crushing -12.3 impact score. He briefly flipped the script on 02/10 vs SAS, pouring in 14 points on 5-of-8 shooting to finally earn a positive +3.7 impact score. By actually stretching the floor to hit two three-pointers and playing with aggressive offensive energy, Timme generated genuine value for the only time in this dismal nine-game run.

Drew Timme spent this late-season stretch marooned at the end of the rotation, logging empty minutes that actively harmed his team. Even in brief cameos, his presence was a glaring liability, highlighted by a disastrous 03/12 vs CHI appearance where he posted a staggering -13.3 impact score in just four minutes of aimless wandering. Extended run offered no relief. During a 23-minute shift off the bench on 03/06 vs IND, he managed a mere four points and two rebounds, generating a dismal -9.0 impact score because he simply floated around the court without forcing the defense to react. A sudden promotion to the starting lineup on 04/07 vs OKC offered a fleeting mirage of productivity. He scored 11 points on 4-of-9 shooting in 26 minutes, but his -1.2 impact score revealed the hidden costs of his defensive limitations and stagnant off-ball movement. Whether playing one minute or twenty-six, Timme remained a net negative who struggled to translate his collegiate pedigree into viable professional basketball.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Timme has posted negative impact in 93% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 80% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Average defender. Timme doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: -5.0, second-half: -7.4. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

In a rough stretch — 10 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 10 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 34 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

H. Barnes 13.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Huff 11.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Bryant 11.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.63
PTS 7
C. Flagg 9.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Bryant 9.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Clingan 9.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.74
PTS 7
M. Potter 9.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 2
R. Williams III 8.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Hardaway Jr. 8.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 2
A. Gill 8.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. Clingan 17.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.29
PTS 5
R. Williams III 16.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 6
H. Barnes 10.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Potter 9.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
W. Riley 9.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 3
J. Huff 8.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
H. Yang 6.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
Z. Nnaji 6.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.6
PTS 4
K. Johnson 6.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Sheppard 6.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

27
Games
3.4
PPG
1.2
RPG
0.9
APG
0.2
SPG
0.0
BPG
57.6
FG%
44.0
3P%
55.6
FT%
8.7
MPG

GAME LOG

27 games played