BOS

2025-26 Season

MAX SHULGA

Boston Celtics | Guard | 6-4
Max Shulga
0.5 PPG
0.1 RPG
0.2 APG
1.3 MPG
-0.6 Impact

Shulga produces at an average rate for a 1-minute workload. Defensive impact (-1.9/game) is a concern.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-0.6
Scoring +0.3
Points 0.5 PPG × +1.00 = +0.5
Missed 2PT 0.1/g × -0.78 = -0.1
Missed 3PT 0.1/g × -0.87 = -0.1
Missed FT 0.0/g × -1.00 = -0.0
Creation +0.1
Assists 0.2/g × +0.50 = +0.1
Off. Rebounds 0.0/g × +1.26 = +0.0
Turnovers -0.2
Turnovers 0.1/g × -1.95 = -0.2
Defense -1.9
Steals 0.0/g × +2.30 = +0.0
Blocks 0.0/g × +0.90 = +0.0
Def. Rebounds 0.1/g × +0.30 = +0.0
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Raw Impact -1.7
Baseline (game-average expected) −-1.1
Net Impact
-0.6
61st pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

Best Game
4 PTS vs MIN
Mar 22 | +4.9 impact
Worst Game
0 PTS vs GSW
Mar 18 | -4.8 impact
PATTERNS

Struggling. Shulga has posted negative impact in 88% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact -1.2, second-half -0.0. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.

SEASON STATS

8
Games
0.5
PPG
0.1
RPG
0.2
APG
0.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
33.3
FG%
0.0
3P%
100.0
FT%
1.3
MPG

GAME LOG

8 games played

Apr 01 vs MIA
-0.1
0pts 0r 0a 0/0 FG 0/0 3P
Mar 30 vs ATL
-0.1
0pts 0r 0a 0/0 FG 0/0 3P
Mar 22 vs MIN
+4.9
4pts 1r 1a 1/1 FG 0/0 3P
Mar 18 vs GSW
-4.8
0pts 0r 1a 0/1 FG 0/1 3P
Mar 14 vs WAS
-0.8
0pts 0r 0a 0/0 FG 0/0 3P
Mar 10 vs SAS
-1.2
0pts 0r 0a 0/0 FG 0/0 3P
Mar 02 vs MIL
-1.1
0pts 0r 0a 0/0 FG 0/0 3P
Feb 04 vs HOU
-1.7
0pts 0r 0a 0/1 FG 0/0 3P