LAL

2025-26 Season

LUKA DONČIĆ

Los Angeles Lakers | Forward-Guard | 6-8
Luka Dončić
33.4PPG
7.8RPG
8.2APG
35.9MPG
+23.4 Impact

Dončić produces at an elite rate for a 36-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+23.4
Scoring +30.8
Points Scored 33.4 PPG = +33.4
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -9.9
Shot Making above expected FG% = +7.3
Creation +1.8
Assists & Self-Creation 8.2 AST/g + self-creation = +1.8
Turnovers -9.1
Turnovers 4.0/g (live + dead blend) = -9.1
Defense +2.1
Steals 1.7/g = +3.9
Blocks 0.5/g = +0.5
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.3
Hustle & Effort +4.2
Rebounds 7.8 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.3
Contested Shots 4.9/g = +1.0
Deflections 3.0/g = +2.0
Charges Drawn 0.2/g = +0.6
Loose Balls 0.6/g = +0.3
Screen Assists 0.1/g = +0.0
Raw Impact +29.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −6.4
Net Impact
+23.4
99th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 234 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 100th
33.4 PPG
Efficiency 80th
61.0% TS
Playmaking 100th
8.2 APG
Rebounding 94th
7.8 RPG
Defense 92th
+11.6/g
Hustle 69th
+14.3/g
Creation 87th
+4.10/g
Shot Making 100th
+13.08/g
TO Discipline 1th
0.11/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

A blistering, high-usage offensive eruption defined the start of Luka Dončić's season, punctuated by nights where he had to manufacture value entirely through grit. He was an absolute wrecking ball during the 10/24 vs MIN matchup, pouring in 49 points on highly efficient 14-of-23 shooting. That brilliant shot selection and relentless downhill creation earned him a massive +47.7 Impact score. He reached an even higher peak during the 12/19 vs UTA contest, orchestrating the offense to perfection with 45 points, 11 rebounds, and 14 assists. Because he supplemented his scoring volume with elite rebounding and flawless playmaking, his Impact soared to a staggering +56.9. Yet, Dončić also found ways to be useful when his jumper completely vanished. During the 11/13 vs OKC game, he managed a +8.0 Impact despite scoring a meager 19 points on 7-of-20 shooting. He salvaged his night by crashing the glass for 7 rebounds and dishing out 7 assists, generating crucial non-scoring value through sheer hustle and court vision.

An exhausting, high-wire offensive act defined this grueling mid-season stretch for Luka Dončić. He was utterly unguardable during the 01/13 vs SAC matchup, pouring in 42 points on hyper-efficient 16-of-25 shooting. That pristine shot selection drove a staggering +43.1 Impact score, as he carved up the defense without settling for bad looks. But volume has a cost. Take the 12/31 vs DET contest, where he scored 30 points but generated a meager +5.6 Impact score. The hidden tax of needing 22 field goal attempts to reach that tally severely dragged down his overall effectiveness, revealing the limits of a heliocentric offense when the jumper goes cold. The heavy workload eventually broke him during the 02/05 vs PHI game, where he stumbled to a -10.3 Impact score in just 16 minutes because forced shots and stagnant playmaking yielded a dismal 10-point dud.

This late-season stretch was defined by an unhinged, high-volume scoring rampage where Luka Dončić simply dared defenses to stop him. The absolute peak of this offensive binge arrived on 03/19 vs MIA, where his blistering 18-for-30 shooting and sheer scoring gravity generated a massive +66.1 impact score alongside 60 points. However, that immense workload occasionally resulted in hollow counting stats. Look at his performance on 03/14 vs DEN, where he posted 30 points, 11 rebounds, and 13 assists. Because he forced terrible looks and clanked his way to a 10-for-26 shooting night, the hidden cost of those wasted possessions dragged his impact down to a thoroughly mediocre +7.3. The heavy minutes eventually took their toll. On 04/02 vs OKC, dead legs and passive execution led to a dismal 12-point outing on 3-for-10 shooting, resulting in a -6.0 impact score that reflected his total lack of offensive rhythm.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Dončić posts positive impact in 95% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~9 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 58% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Dončić consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: +22.1, second-half: +24.7. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 21 games. Longest cold streak: 1 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 65 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

K. Dunn 106.9 poss
FG% 46.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.41
PTS 44
J. Wells 101.1 poss
FG% 55.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.32
PTS 32
H. Jones 98.7 poss
FG% 46.7%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.19
PTS 19
S. Castle 97.3 poss
FG% 38.1%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.23
PTS 22
C. Braun 91.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 37.5%
PPP 0.29
PTS 26
D. Daniels 83.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.22
PTS 18
T. Eason 71.0 poss
FG% 38.5%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.23
PTS 16
R. Westbrook 65.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 14
A. Thompson 63.6 poss
FG% 42.1%
3P% 16.7%
PPP 0.33
PTS 21
P. Banchero 63.4 poss
FG% 29.4%
3P% 12.5%
PPP 0.21
PTS 13

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

H. Jones 102.1 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.11
PTS 11
J. Wells 74.7 poss
FG% 35.7%
3P% 27.3%
PPP 0.17
PTS 13
K. Dunn 74.3 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 12
C. Braun 62.7 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 5
J. Champagnie 49.8 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 7
S. Mykhailiuk 47.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.21
PTS 10
J. McDaniels 45.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 10
P. Larsson 44.5 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 6
J. Smith Jr. 42.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 13
H. Barnes 41.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5

SEASON STATS

65
Games
33.4
PPG
7.8
RPG
8.2
APG
1.7
SPG
0.5
BPG
47.6
FG%
36.4
3P%
77.7
FT%
35.9
MPG

GAME LOG

65 games played