LAC

2025-26 Season

KOBE SANDERS

LA Clippers | Guard | 6-8
Kobe Sanders
7.2 PPG
2.2 RPG
1.6 APG
19.7 MPG
-6.4 Impact

Sanders produces at an poor rate for a 20-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-6.4
Scoring +6.6
Points 7.2 PPG = +4.9
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.7
Creation +0.4
Creation 1.6 AST/g = +0.4
Turnovers -2.8
Turnovers 1.2/g = -2.8
Defense -0.4
Defense 0.7 STL, 0.1 BLK = -0.4
Hustle & Effort +1.5
Rebounds 2.2 RPG = +1.5
Raw Impact +5.3
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.7
Net Impact
-6.4
11th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 33th
7.5 PPG
Efficiency 72th
57.7% TS
Playmaking 27th
1.7 APG
Rebounding 30th
2.3 RPG
Defense 44th
+7.0/g
Hustle 34th
+7.6/g
Creation 61th
+3.11/g
Shot Making 33th
+5.31/g
TO Discipline 46th
0.06/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Extreme volatility and an inability to blend scoring with defensive reliability defined Kobe Sanders's chaotic opening stretch to the season. He toggled between the starting five and the second unit, often inflicting as much damage on his own team as the opposition. Look at 12/01 vs MIA, where he managed 10 points but posted an abysmal -10.0 impact score because a barrage of forced, missed perimeter shots completely crippled the offensive flow. Conversely, Sanders occasionally found ways to tilt the floor without scoring a single basket. During 10/22 vs UTA, he finished with 0 points but generated a +2.7 impact by applying relentless ball pressure to earn a +3.0 defensive score. When his shot selection actually tightened up, he became a lethal spark plug. He erupted for 13 points in just 13 minutes on 12/23 vs HOU, using blistering 3-for-3 shooting from beyond the arc to drive a massive +9.4 impact. Unfortunately, those flawless offensive nights remained the exception rather than the rule.

A suffocating slump defined Kobe Sanders's midseason stretch, as defensive lapses and erratic shot selection kept him firmly in the negative regardless of his role. Even when he found his rhythm offensively, hidden costs dragged him down. He poured in 20 points on 9-of-16 shooting during a start on 01/05 vs GSW. However, bleeding points on the defensive end completely negated that scoring burst, saddling him with a -4.4 impact score. When his shot stopped falling, his minutes became actively harmful. Look no further than 01/03 vs BOS, where complete offensive paralysis and an inability to stay in front of his man generated a catastrophic -18.1 impact score. Later on 01/25 vs BKN, a severe lack of off-ball defensive awareness allowed opponents to feast on open cuts, resulting in a brutal -14.5 impact score despite a decent 9-point output. Whether he was forcing low-percentage jumpers against set defenses or missing basic rotations, Sanders simply could not stop hemorrhaging value.

Kobe Sanders spent this twenty-game stretch oscillating wildly between erratic liability and sudden microwave scorer. Even when his shot was falling, hidden mistakes often eroded his overall value on the floor. Despite an efficient 11-point outing on 03/13 vs CHI, careless ball security and poorly timed fouls completely undermined his performance, dragging him to a -4.0 impact score. Conversely, Sanders occasionally found ways to salvage his minutes without filling up the stat sheet. He managed just 5 points on 03/19 vs NOP, but still generated a +3.0 impact because his high-level defensive rotations and active hands disrupted the opposing offense. When his decision-making finally aligned with his scoring touch, the ceiling was undeniable. He exploded for 19 points on 8-of-10 shooting on 03/23 vs MIL, utilizing decisive drives against tight coverage to post a stretch-high +8.4 impact score.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Sanders has posted negative impact in 78% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 54% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Average defender. Sanders doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -7.8, second-half: -5.0. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 3 games. Longest cold streak: 7 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 71 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

V. Edgecombe 40.7 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 14
C. Spencer 31.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
B. Ingram 31.6 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 8
L. Dončić 31.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4
S. Curry 30.6 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 7
K. Knueppel 28.9 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4
A. Dosunmu 25.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 3
J. Champagnie 25.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 4
W. Clayton Jr. 25.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.12
PTS 3
K. George 24.8 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.2
PTS 5

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

A. Dosunmu 41.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
V. Edgecombe 36.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
W. Clayton Jr. 36.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
K. Knueppel 34.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.26
PTS 9
R. Sheppard 33.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
M. Buzelis 32.2 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 5
J. Champagnie 30.9 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 12
J. Murray 30.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Spencer 30.1 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 8
D. Bane 28.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 7

SEASON STATS

69
Games
7.2
PPG
2.2
RPG
1.6
APG
0.7
SPG
0.1
BPG
46.5
FG%
40.7
3P%
82.6
FT%
19.7
MPG

GAME LOG

69 games played